Preschool Activity Card Sort (PACS) is a valid measure of preschoolers’ participation and is a useful and unique tool for focusing on the extent and frequency of their participation. However, given the cultural differences between Japan and other countries, researchers should consider these differences when adapting the PACS for use with children in Japan. The purpose of this study was to select culturally suitable activity items to develop the Japanese version of PACS (PACS-JPN). A two-round survey of parents (who had typically developing children aged between 3 and 6 years) was conducted. The final version of the PACS-JPN included 98 activity items. The PACS-JPN reflects Japanese sociocultural background and allows occupational therapists to assess preschoolers’ actual participation by assessing multiple aspects of children’s community life. The psychometric properties, including the validity and reliability of the PACS-JPN should be examined in future research.
BianchiS. M.RobinsonJ. (1997). What did you do today? Children’s use of time, family composition, and the acquisition of social capital. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 332–344. https://doi.org/10.2307/353474
5.
d’EntremontL.GregorM.KirouE.NelliganL.DennisD. (2017). Developmental milestones for productivity occupations in children and youth: An integrative review. WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation, 56, 75–89. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-162466
6.
EhrmannL. C.AeschlemanS. R.SvanumS. (1995). Parental reports of community activity patterns: A comparison between young children with disabilities and their nondisabled peers. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 16, 331–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/0891-4222(95)00017-H
7.
GronskiM. P.NiemannA.BergC. (2013). Participation patterns of urban preschoolers attending head start. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 33, 68–75. https://doi.org/10.3928/15394492-20121026-01
8.
HaleyS. M. (1992). Pediatric evaluation of disability inventory (PEDI): Development, standardization and administration manual. PEDI Research Group.
9.
HamedR.AlhereshR.DahabS. A.CollinsB.FryerJ.HolmM. B. (2011). Development of the Arab heritage Activity Card Sort. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 34, 299–306. https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0b013e32834afc58
10.
HustonA. C.WrightJ. C.MarquisJ.GreenS. B. (1999). How young children spend their time: Television and other activities. Developmental Psychology, 35, 912–925. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.35.4.912
KatagiriM. (2013). The present situation of home education and mothers. Bulletin of Shokei Gakuin University, 45, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.24577/seia.45.0_1
LarsonR. W. (2001). How U.S. children and adolescents spend time: What it does (and doesn’t) tell us about their development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 160–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00139
15.
Laver-FawcettA. J.MallinsonS. H. (2013). Development of the Activity Card Sort-United Kingdom version (ACS-UK). OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 33, 134–145. https://doi.org/10.3928/15394492-20130614-02
16.
LaVesserP.BergC. (2011). Participation patterns in preschool children with an autism spectrum disorder. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 31, 33–39. https://doi.org/10.3928/15394492-20100823-01
17.
LawM. (2002). Participation in the occupations of everyday life. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56, 640–649. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.56.6.640
18.
LawM.KingG.KingS.KertoyM.HurleyP.RosenbaumP.. . .HannaS. (2006). Patterns of participation in recreational and leisure activities among children with complex physical disabilities. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 48, 337–342. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012162206000740
19.
LiuM.ToikawaH.SekiM.DomenK.ChinoN. (1998). Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM): A preliminary study in nondisabled Japanese children. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 77, 36–43. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002060-199801000-00006
20.
MalkawiS. H.Abu-DahabS. M. N.AmroA. F.AlmasriN. A. (2017). The psychometric properties of the Arabic Preschool Activity Card Sort. Occupational Therapy International, 2017, Article 5180382. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5180382
21.
MalkawiS. H.HamedR. T.Abu-DahabS. M. N.AlHereshR. A.HolmM. B. (2015). Development of the Arabic Version of the Preschool Activity Card Sort (A-PACS). Child: Care, Health and Development, 41, 559–568. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12209
RichardsonP. K. (2002). The school as social context: Social interaction patterns of children with physical disabilities. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56, 296–304. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.56.3.296
25.
SimeonssonR. J.CarlsonD.HuntingtonG. S.McMillenJ. S.BrentJ. L. (2001). Students with disabilities: A national survey of participation in school activities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 23, 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/096382801750058134
26.
StoffelA.BergC. (2008). Spanish translation and validation of the Preschool Activity Card Sort. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 28, 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/01942630802031859
27.
UemuraJ.TanikagaM.TanakaM.ShimoseM.HoshinoA.IgarashiG. (2019). Selection of activity items for development of the Activity Card Sort-Japan Version. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 39, 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1539449218784729
28.
World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health.
29.
Youth Affairs Management and Coordination Agency. (1996). International comparative survey relative to children and family report.
