Background. Little is known about assistive device use by young children with cerebral palsy (CP) classified as Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) III–V. Purpose. This secondary analysis examined use of mobility, adaptive seating, bathing, and toileting devices in young children participating in a larger power mobility study. Method. Data from 42 participants aged 18–87 months were gathered, using the parent-report Home Use of Technology for CHildren (HUTCH), within the first 3–4 weeks and at the end of the 6-month power mobility loan. Associations were examined between device, time spent in each device and gross motor, manual abilities, and Level of Sitting Scale functional classifications. Results. Age, gross motor function, and manual abilities were associated with use of either a stroller, tilt-in-space, or upright manual wheelchair, while age, postural, and manual abilities were associated with use of wheelchair seating rather than separate adaptive seating or a typical high-chair or booster seat. Children with greater impairments were more likely to use bathing devices, while few used toileting devices. More time was spent by children using tilt-in-space wheelchairs compared with upright wheelchairs or strollers. Conclusion. Statistically significant associations were identified between child profile and use of manual mobility, seating and bathroom devices.
AnabyD.Korner-BitenskyN.StevenE.TremblayS.SniderL.AveryL.LawM. (2017). Current rehabilitation practices for children with cerebral palsy: Focus and gaps. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 37(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3109/01942638.2015.1126880
2.
AndrewsC.Kakooza-MwesigeA.KamusiimeS.ForssbergH.EliassonA. C. (2023). A goal-directed program for wheelchair use for children and young people with cerebral palsy in Uganda: An explorative intervention study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(6), 2325. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062325
3.
AngsupaisalM.MaathuisC. G. B.Hadders-AlgraM. (2015). Adaptive seating systems in children with severe cerebral palsy across international classification of functioning, disability and health for children and youth version domains: A systematic review. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 57(10), 919–930. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.12762
4.
BailesA. F.GannottiM.BellowsD. M.ShustermanM.LymanJ.HornS. D. (2018). Caregiver knowledge and preferences for gross motor function information in cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 60(12), 1264–1270. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.13994
5.
BartonC.BuckleyJ.SamiaP.WilliamsF.TaylorS. R.LindoewoodR. (2022). The efficacy of appropriate paper-based technology for Kenyan children with cerebral palsy. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 17(8), 927–937. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1830442
6.
BenedictR.LeeJ.MarrujoS.FarelA. (1999). Assistive devices as an early childhood intervention: Evaluating outcomes. Technology and Disability, 11(1-2), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.3233/TAD-1999-111-211
Bourke-TaylorH.CotterC.StephanR. (2014). Young children with cerebral palsy: Families self-reported equipment needs and out-of-pocket expenditure. Child: Care, Health and Development, 40(5), 654–662. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12098
9.
ChengH.-Y. K.HuS.-Y.JuY.-Y.YuY.-C. (2025). Exploring growth-stage variations in home use of positioning and mobility assistive technology for children with GMFCS IV cerebral palsy; parental insights and challenges. Bioengineering, 12(3), 241. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12030241
10.
ChiarelloL.PalisanoR.MaggsJ.OrlinM.AlmasriN.KangL.ChangH. (2010). Family priorities for activity and participation of children and youth with cerebral palsy. Physical Therapy, 90(9), 1254. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20090388
11.
ChungJ.EvansJ.LeeC.LeeJ.RabbaniY.RoxboroughL.HarrisS. R. (2008). Effectiveness of adaptive seating on sitting posture and postural control in children with cerebral palsy. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 20(4), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0b013e31818b7bdd
de CamposA. C.Hidalgo RoblesA.LongoE.ShraderC.PalegG. (2024). F-words and early intervention ingredients for non-ambulant children with cerebral palsy: A scoping review. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 66(1), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.15682
14.
EganM.RestallG. (2022). The Canadian model of occupational participation. In EganM.RestallG. (Eds.), Promoting occupational participation: Collaborate relationship-focused occupational therapy (pp. 73–96). Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists.
15.
EliassonA.UllenhagA.WahlströmU.Krumlinde-SundholmL. (2017). Mini-MACS: Development of the manual ability classification system for children younger than 4 years of age with signs of cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 59(1), 72–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.13162
16.
EliassonA.-C.Krumlinde-SundholmL.RösbladB.BeckungE.ArnerM.OhrvallA.-M.RosenbaumP. (2006). The manual ability classification system (MACS) for children with cerebral palsy: Scale development and evidence of validity and reliability. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 48(7), 549–554. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012162206001162
17.
FieldD. A.LivingstoneR. W. (2022). Parents’ and therapists’ satisfaction with four early childhood power mobility devices. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 89(4), 364–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/00084174221098879
18.
FieldD. A.RoxboroughL. A. (2011). Responsiveness of the seated postural control measure and the level of sitting scale in children with neuromotor disorders. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 6(6), 473–482. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2010.532285
19.
FieldD. A.RoxboroughL. A. (2012). Validation of the relation between the type and amount of seating support provided and level of sitting scale (LSS) scores for children with neuromotor disorders. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 15(3), 202–208. https://doi.org/10.3109/17518423.2012.673177
FifeS. E.RoxboroughL. A.ArmstrongR. W.HarrisS. R.GregsonJ. L.FieldD. (1991). Development of a clinical measure of postural control for assessment of adaptive seating in children with neuromotor disabilities. Physical Therapy, 71(12), 981–993. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/71.12.981
22.
HarrisP.TaylorR.ThielkeR.PayneJ.GonzalesN.CondeJ. (2009). Research electronic data capture (REDcap) - A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 42(2), 377–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
23.
InthachomR.PrasertsukdeeS.RyanS. E.KaewkungwalJ.LimpaninlachatS. (2021). Evaluation of the multidimensional effects of adaptive seating interventions for young children with non-ambulatory cerebral palsy. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 16(7), 780–788. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1731613
KorpelaR.KoivikkoM. (1992). A regional survey of technical aids used by handicapped children in day care and at school. Disability and Rehabilitation, 14(1), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638289209166421
KurneS. A.GuptaA. D. (2016). Impact of long-term use of adaptive seating device on children with cerebral palsy and their families in Mumbai, India. Disability, CBR and Inclusive Development, 27(3), 118–131. https://doi.org/10.5463/DCID.v27i3.465
28.
LacosteM.TherrienM.PrinceF. (2009). Stability of children with cerebral palsy in their wheelchair seating: Perceptions of parents and therapists. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 4(3), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483100802362036
29.
LahaijeS. T. A.LuijkxJ.WaningeA.van der PuttenA. A. J. (2023). Support needs of families with a child with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 70(7), 1184–1197. https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2023.2168718
30.
LivingstoneR.FieldD. (2021). Exploring young children’s activity and participation change following six months’ power mobility experience. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 84(11), 713–722. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308022620973935
31.
LivingstoneR. W.FieldD. A. (2023). Exploring change in young children’s power mobility skill following several months’ experience. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 18(3), 285–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1847207
32.
LivingstoneR. W.PalegG. S.FieldD. A. (2024). Supported standing and stepping device use in young children with cerebral palsy, gross motor function classification system III, IV and V: A descriptive study. Assistive Technology, 36(4), 264–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2023.2283461
33.
MacLennanA. H.LewisS.Moreno-De-LucaA.FaheyM.LeventerR. J.McIntyreS.Ben-PaziH.CorbettM.WangX.BaynamG.FehlingsD.KurianM. A.ZhuC.HimmelmannK.Smithers-SheedyH.WilsonY.OcañaC. S.van EykC.BadawiN.GeczJ. (2019). Genetic or other causation should not change the clinical diagnosis of cerebral palsy. Journal of Child Neurology, 34(8), 472–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/0883073819840449
McIntyreS.GoldsmithS.WebbA.EhlingerV.HollungS. J.McConnellK.ArnaudC.Smithers-SheedyH.OskouiM.KhandakerG.HimmelmannK. (2022). Global prevalence of cerebral palsy: A systematic analysis. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 64(12), 1494–1506. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.15346
36.
MillardE.BenoreE.MosherK. (2013). A multidisciplinary functional toileting pathway for children with cerebral palsy: Preliminary analysis. Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology, 1(1), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1037/cpp0000005
37.
MoenR. D.ØstensjøS. (2023). Understanding the use and benefits of assistive devices among young children with cerebral palsy and their families in Norway: A cross-sectional population-based registry study. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 19(4), 1454–1462. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2023.2198563
38.
NotenS.PetterssonK.CzubaT.CloodtE.CaseyJ.Rodby- BousquetE. (2024). Probability of independent walking and wheeled mobility in individuals with cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 66(3), 326–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.15731
39.
NovakI. (2014). Evidence-based diagnosis, health care, and rehabilitation for children with cerebral palsy. Journal of Child Neurology, 29(8), 1141–1156. https://doi.org/10.1177/0883073814535503
40.
NovakI.HonanI. (2019). Effectiveness of paediatric occupational therapy for children with disabilities: A systematic review. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 66(3), 258–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12573
41.
NovakI.MorganC.AddeL.BlackmanJ.BoydR. N.Brunstrom-HernandezJ.CioniG.DamianoD.DarrahJ.EliassonA.-C.de VriesL. S.EinspielerC.FaheyM.FehlingsD.FerrieroD. M.FettersL.FioriS.ForssbergH.GordonA. M.BadawiN. (2017). Early, accurate diagnosis and early intervention in cerebral palsy. JAMA Pediatrics, 171(9), 897–907. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.1689
42.
NovakI.Smithers-SheedyH.MorganC. (2012). Predicting equipment needs of children with cerebral palsy using the gross motor function classification system: A cross-sectional study. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 7(1), 30–36. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2011.556210
43.
O’SheaR.BlackL.Gaebler-SpiraD.RojasA. M. (2018). Investigating toileting mastery in children with cerebral palsy. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 99(10), e21–e22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2018.07.071
44.
ØstensjøS.BrogrenE.KN. (2007). Everyday functioning in young children with cerebral palsy: Functional skills, caregiver assistance, and modifications of the environment. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 45(9), 603–612. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2003.tb00964.x
45.
ØstensjøS.CarlbergE.VøllestadN. (2005). The use and impact of assistive devices and other environmental modifications on everyday activities and care in young children with cerebral palsy. Disability and Rehabilitation, 27(14), 849–861. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280400018619
46.
PalegG. S.WilliamsS. A.LivingstoneR. W. (2024). Supported standing and supported stepping devices for children with non-ambulant cerebral palsy: An interdependence and F-words focus. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 21, 669. https://doi.org/10.3390/ ijerph21060669
47.
PalisanoR.RosenbaumP.WalterS.RussellD.WoodE.GaluppiB. (1997). Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 39(4), 214–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.1997.tb07414.x
48.
PatilI. (2021). Visualizations with statistical details: The ‘ggstatsplot’ approach. Journal of Open Source Software, 6(61), 3167. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03167
49.
R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (4.2.1). R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/.
50.
RigbyP. J.RyanS. E.CampbellK. A. (2009). Effect of adaptive seating devices on activity performance of children with cerebral palsy. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 90(8), 1389–1395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2009.02.013
51.
Rodby-BousquetE.AgustssonA. (2021). Postural asymmetries and assistive devices used by adults with cerebral palsy in lying, sitting, and standing. Frontiers in Neurology, 12, 758706. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.758706
52.
Rodby-BousquetE.HägglundG. (2010). Use of manual and powered wheelchairs in children with cerebral palsy: A cross-sectional study. BMC Pediatrics, 10(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-10-59
53.
Rodby-BousquetE.PalegG.CaseyJ.WizertA.LivingstoneR. (2016). Physical risk factors influencing wheeled mobility in children with cerebral palsy: A cross-sectional study. BMC Pediatrics, 16(1), 165. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-016-0707-6
54.
RomeoD. M. M.CioniM.ScotoM.MazzoneL.PalermoF.RomeoM. G. (2008). Neuromotor development in infants with cerebral palsy investigated by the Hammersmith infant neurological examination during the first year of age. European Journal of Paediatric Neurology, 12(1), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpn.2007.05.006
55.
RyanS.CampbellK. (2009). Evaluation of a parent-report diary of the home use of assistive devices by young children with cerebral palsy. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 4(3), 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483100802715084
56.
RyanS.CampbellK.RigbyP.Fishbein-GermonB.HubleyD.ChanB. (2009). The impact of adaptive seating devices on the lives of young children with cerebral palsy and their families. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 90(1), 27–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2008.07.011
57.
RyanS. E.SawatzkyB.CampbellK. A.RigbyP. J.MontpetitK.RoxboroughL.McKeeverP. D. (2014). Functional outcomes associated with adaptive seating interventions in children and youth with wheeled mobility needs. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 95(5), 825–831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2013.09.001
58.
SahinogluD.CoskunG.BekN. (2017). Effects of different seating equipment on postural control and upper extremity function in children with cerebral palsy. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 41(1), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309364616637490
59.
ShahidM. (2004). Buggy-to-wheelchair progression for children with cerebral palsy: Parents’ and therapists’ opinions. International Journal of Therapy & Rehabilitation, 11(12), 560–566. https://doi.org/10.12968/IJTR.2004.11.12.17209
60.
Smithers-SheedyH.BadawiN.BlairE.CansC.HimmelmannK.Krägeloh-MannI.McIntyreS.SleeJ.UldallP.WatsonL.WilsonM. (2014). What constitutes cerebral palsy in the twenty-first century?Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 56(4), 323–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.12262
61.
te VeldeA.MorganC.NovakI.TantsisE.BadawiN. (2019). Early diagnosis and classification of cerebral palsy: An historical perspective and barriers to an early diagnosis. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 8(10), 1599. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8101599
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
