Rasch keyforms can help interpret clinical assessment scores. The Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) is a commonly used assessment, yet no keyform currently exists. The aim is to provide a keyform for the ARAT and demonstrate how a clinician can use the keyform to design optimally challenging rehabilitation sessions. Secondary analysis of ARAT data (n = 122) using confirmatory factor and Rasch analyses were used to examine the measurement properties and generate a keyform. The item standardized factor loadings were >0.40 (range = 0.82-0.96) and R2 values were >.60 (range = .65-.96). All items exhibited adequate infit statistics with point measure correlations >.60 (range = .72-.97). Person reliability was .98, and person separation was 7.07. Item-difficulty measures ranged from −2.78 logits to 2.64 logits. The ARAT has strong measurement properties, and a keyform was provided. We showed how the keyform can be utilized by clinicians to interpret scores, set goals, and plan treatment.
AbramsD.DavidsonM.HarrickJ.HarcourtP.ZylinskiM.ClancyJ. (2006). Monitoring the change: Current trends in outcome measure usage in physiotherapy. Manual Therapy, 11, 46-53.
2.
American Occupational Therapy Association. (2014). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process (3rd ed.). American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68, S1-S48.
3.
American Physical Therapy Association. (2014). Guide to physical therapy practice 3.0. Alexandria, VA: Author.
4.
AndresenE. M. (2000). Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81(12, Suppl. 2), S15-S20.
5.
AveryL. M.RussellD. J.RainaP. S.WalterS. D.RosenbaumP. L. (2003). Rasch analysis of the gross motor function measure: Validating the assumptions of the Rasch model to create an interval-level measure. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84, 697-705.
6.
BarkerR. N.BrauerS. G. (2005). Upper limb recovery after stroke: The stroke survivors’ perspective. Disability and Rehabilitation, 27, 1213-1223. doi:10.1080/09638280500075717
7.
BodeR. K.HeinemannA. W.KozlowskiA. J.PretzC. R. (2014). Self-scoring templates for motor and cognitive subscales of the FIM instrument for persons with spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 95, 676-679e5. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2013.11.009
8.
BohannonR. W.AndrewsA. W.SmithM. B. (1988). Rehabilitation goals of patients with hemiplegia. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 11, 181-184.
9.
BondT. G.FoxC. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
BrownT. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
11.
ChenH. F.LinK. C.WuC. Y.ChenC. L. (2012). Rasch validation and predictive validity of the Action Research Arm Test in patients receiving stroke rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 93, 1039-1045. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2011.11.033
12.
FisherW. P. (1992). Reliability statistics. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 6, 238.
13.
GuadagnoliM. A.LeeT. D. (2004). Challenge point: A framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36, 212-224. doi:10.3200/jmbr.36.2.212-224
14.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1-55.
15.
JetteD. U.HalbertJ.IversonC.MiceliE.ShahP. (2009). Use of standardized outcome measures in physical therapist practice: Perceptions and applications. Physical Therapy, 89, 125-135.
16.
KayT. M.MyersA. M.HuijbregtsM. P. J. (2001). How far have we come since 1992? A comparative survey of physiotherapists’ use of outcome measures. Physiotherapy Canada, 53, 268-275.
17.
KennyD. A.KaniskanB.McCoachD. B. (2015). The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom. Sociological Methods & Research, 44, 486-507.
18.
KielhofnerG.DobriaL.ForsythK.BasuS. (2005). The construction of keyforms for obtaining instantaneous measures from the Occupational Performance History Interview rating scales. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 25, 23-32.
19.
KlineR. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
20.
KohC. L.HsuehI. P.WangW. C.SheuC. F.YuT. Y.WangC. H.HsiehC. L. (2006). Validation of the Action Research Arm Test using item response theory in patients after stroke. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 38, 375-380. doi:10.1080/16501970600803252
21.
LangC. E.WagnerJ. M.DromerickA. W.EdwardsD. F. (2006). Measurement of upper-extremity function early after stroke: Properties of the Action Research Arm Test. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87, 1605-1610.
22.
LinacreJ. M. (1997). Instantaneous measurement and diagnosis. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 11, 315-324.
23.
LinacreJ. M. (2002). Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. Journal of Applied Measurement, 3, 85-106.
24.
LinacreJ. M. (2012). A user’s guide to Winsteps and Ministeps Rasch-model computer programs. Chicago, IL: Winsteps.
25.
LyleR. C. (1981). A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 4, 483-492.
26.
MarshH. W.BallaJ. R.McDonaldR. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391-410.
27.
Menon-NairA.Korner-BitenskyN.Wood-DauphineeS.RobertsonE. (2006). Assessment of unilateral spatial neglect post stroke in Canadian acute care hospitals: Are we neglecting neglect?Clinical Rehabilitation, 20, 623-634.
28.
MozaffarianD.BenjaminE. J.GoA. S.ArnettD. K.BlahaM. J.CushmanM.. . . on behalf of the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. (2016). Executive summary: Heart disease and stroke statistics—2016 update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 133, 447-454. doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000366
29.
MuthénB.MuthénL. (2010). Mplus (Version 6). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
30.
PapeT. L.MallinsonT.GuernonA. (2014). Psychometric properties of the disorders of consciousness scale. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 95, 1672-1684. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2014.04.015
31.
PlatzT.PinkowskiC.van WijckF.KimI.-H.di BellaP.JohnsonG. (2005). Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: A multicentre study. Clinical Rehabilitation, 19, 404-411.
32.
PretzC. R.KeanJ.HeinemannA.KozlowskiA. J.BodeR.GebhardtE. (2015). A multidimensional Rasch analysis of the functional independence measure based on the national institute on disability, independent living, and rehabilitation research traumatic brain injury model systems national database. Journal of Neurotrauma, 33, 1358-1362. doi:10.1089/neu.2015.4138
33.
SwinkelsR.van PeppenR. P. S.WittinkH.CustersJ. W. H.BeurskensA. (2011). Current use and barriers and facilitators for implementation of standardised measures in physical therapy in the Netherlands. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 12, Article 106. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-12-106
34.
TorenbeekM.CaulfieldB.GarrettM.Van HartenW. (2001). Current use of outcome measures for stroke and low back pain rehabilitation in five European countries: First results of the ACROSS project. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 24, 95-101.
35.
van der LeeJ. H.RoordaL. D.BeckermanH.LankhorstG. J.BouterL. M. (2002). Improving the Action Research Arm Test: A unidimensional hierarchical scale. Clinical Rehabilitation, 16, 646-653.
36.
VelozoC. A.WarrenM.HicksE.BergerK. A. (2013). Generating clinical outputs for self-reports of visual functioning. Optometry and Vision Science, 90, 765-775. doi:10.1097/opx.0000000000000007
37.
VelozoC. A.WoodburyM. L. (2011). Translating measurement findings into rehabilitation practice: An example using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the upper extremity with clients following stroke. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 48, 1211-1222.
38.
WolfS. L.WinsteinC. J.MillerJ. P.TaubE.UswatteG.MorrisD., . . .EXCITE Investigators. (2006). Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: The EXCITE randomized clinical trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 296, 2095-2104. doi:10.1001/jama.296.17.2095
39.
WoodburyM. L.AndersonK.FinettoC.FortuneA.DellenbachB.GrattanE.HutchisonS. (2016). Matching task difficulty to patient ability during task practice improves upper extremity motor skill after stroke: A proof-of-concept study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 97, 1863-1871. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2016.03.022
40.
WoodburyM. L.VelozoC. A.RichardsL. G.DuncanP. W. (2013). Rasch analysis staging methodology to classify upper extremity movement impairment after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 94, 1527-1533. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2013.03.007
WrightB. D.StoneM. H. (1979). Best test design. Rasch measurement. Chicago, IL: MESA Press.
44.
YozbatiranN.Der-YeghiaianL.CramerS. C. (2008). A standardized approach to performing the Action Research Arm Test. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 22, 78-90. doi:10.1177/1545968307305353
