This study evaluated whether an additional home training program on bathing devices would improve the rate of use, personal independence, and service satisfaction of older adults who had experienced strokes. A prospective pretest and posttest randomized control trial design was adopted. Fifty-three older adults who had experienced strokes were randomly assigned to either the intervention group or the control group. The prescription of and training in the use of devices was conducted with both groups while they were in the hospital. The intervention group received additional home-based intervention in the use of devices immediately after discharge, but the control group did not. All of the subjects were assessed before discharge and 3 months after discharge using the Functional Independence Measure and the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology. The results showed that the intervention group improved significantly in functioning (t = 3.89; df = 51; P = .01) and satisfaction (t = 69.8; df = 29; P = .01) after intervention. The rate of use of bathing devices was relatively higher in the intervention group (96.7%) than in the control group (56.5%). Further studies with extended follow-up services are needed to evaluate the long-term effects of training in the use of assistive devices.
BynumH. S.RogersJ. C. (1987). The use and effectiveness of assistive devices possessed by patients seen in home care. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 7, 181–191.
2.
ChamberlainM. A.ThornleyG.WrightV. (1978). Evaluation of aids and equipment for bath and toilet. Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, 17, 187–194.
3.
ChenT.-Y. A.MannW. C.TomitaM.NochajskiS. (2000). Caregiver involvement in the use of assistive devices by frail older persons. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 20, 179–199.
4.
ClemsonL.MartinR. (1996). Usage and effectiveness of rails, bathing and toileting aids. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 10(1), 41–59.
5.
DavingY.AndrenE.NordholmL.GrimbyG. (2001). Reliability of an interview approach to the Functional Independence Measure. Clinical Rehabilitation, 15, 301–310.
6.
DemersL.SkaB.GironxF.Weiss-LambrouR. (1999). Stability and reproducibility of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST). Assistive Technology, 3, 42–52.
7.
DemersL.Weiss-LambrouR.SkaB. (2000). Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST) version 2.0: An outcome measure for Assistive Technology Devices. Webster, NY: Institute for Matching Person & Technology.
8.
DemersL.Weiss-LambrouR.WesselsR. D.SkaB.DewitteL. (1996). An international content validation of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST). Occupational Therapy International, 6, 159–175.
9.
DoddsT. A.MartinD. P.StoloW. C.DeyoR. A. (1993). A validation of the Functional Independence Measurement and its performance among rehabilitation inpatients. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 74, 531–536.
10.
EdwardsN. I.JonesD. A. (1998). Ownership and use of assistive devices amongst older people in the community. Age & Aging, 27, 463–468.
11.
FinlaysonM.HavixbeckK. (1992). A post-discharge study on the use of assistive devices. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59, 201–207.
12.
GeddesJ. M. L.FearJ.TennantA.PickeringA.HillmanM.ChamberlainM. A. (1996). Prevalence of self reported stroke in a population in northern England. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 50, 140–143.
13.
GilbertsonL.LanghorneP. (2000). Home-based Occupational Therapy: Stroke patients' satisfaction with occupational performance and service provision. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63, 464–468.
14.
GitlinL. N.LevineR. E. (1992). Prescribing adaptive devices to the elderly: Principles for treatment in the home. International Journal of Technology & Aging, 5, 107–120.
15.
GitlinL. N.LevineR.GeigerC. (1993). Adaptive device use by older adults with mixed disabilities. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 74, 149–152.
16.
GitlinL. N.LuborskyM. R.SchemmR. L. (1998). Emerging concerns of older stroke patients about assistive device use. The Gerontologist, 38, 169–180.
17.
GrangerC. V.HamiltonB. B.LinacreJ. M.HeinemannA. W.WrightB. D. (1993). Performance profiles of the Functional Independence Measure. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 72, 84–89.
18.
HollingsE. M.HaworthR. J. (1978). Supply and use of aids and appliances. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 41, 336–339.
19.
Hong Kong Census and Statistics Department. (1999). Hong Kong population projections 1997–2016. Hong Kong: Government Printer.
20.
Hong Kong Department of Health. (1999). Annual report for the financial year 1997–98 (p. 182). Hong Kong: Department of Health.
21.
Hong Kong Hospital Authority. (1998). Statistical report 1997/98. Hong Kong: Hospital Planning and Development Section, Hospital Authority.
22.
KohnJ. G.LeBlancM.MortolaP. (1994). Measuring quality and performance of assistive technology: Results of a prospective monitoring program. Assistive Technology, 6, 120–125.
23.
MannW. C.HurrenD.TomitaM. (1993). Comparison of assistive device use and needs of home-based older persons with different impairments. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47, 980–987.
24.
MannW. C.HurrenD.TomitaM.CharvatB. (1996). Use of assistive devices for bathing by elderly who are not institutionalized. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 16, 261–285.
25.
MantonK. G.CorderL.StallardE. (1993). Changes in the use of personal assistance and special equipment from 1982 to 1989: Results from the 1982 & 1989 NLTCS. The Gerontologist, 33, 168–176.
26.
ParkerM. G.ThorslundM. (1991). The use of technical aids among community-based elderly. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45, 712–718.
PollakN.RheaultW.StoeckerJ. L. (1996). Reliability and validity of the Functional Independence Measures for persons aged 80 years and above from a multilevel continuing care retirement community. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 77, 1056–1061.
29.
SmithM. E.WaltonM. S.GarrawayW. M. (1981). The use of aids and adaptations in a study of stroke rehabilitation. Health Bulletin, 39, 98–106.
30.
StoweJ.ThornelyG.ChamberlainM. A.WrightV. (1982). Evaluation of aids and equipment for bathing. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45, 92–95.
31.
Technology-Related Assistance for Individuals with Disabilities Act of1988. Catalogue No. 850 (Senate Rpt. 100–438). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
32.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1995). Clinical practice guideline (No. 16) (p. 248). Rockville, MD: The Agency for Health Care Policy and Research.
