Endovascular aneurysm repair, though minimally invasive and has the benefit of relatively low perioperative complication rates, it is associated with significant long term reintervention rates related to endoleaks. Several variables have been studied to predict the outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair, 1 of which is the calcium burden of the vasculature. This prompted us to study the association between calcium burden measured by the standardized Agatston scoring system and the outcomes of Endovascular aneurysm repair.
Methods
This is a retrospective study of patients who underwent Endovascular aneurysm repair from 2008 to 2020 at our institution and who had a non-contrast computerized tomography scan preoperatively, accounting for 87 patients. The calcium burden of the vasculature was measured by the Agatston scoring system allowing for better reproducibility, and the outcome variables included mortality and endoleaks.
Results
Patients with higher median total calcium scores (≥12966.9) had significantly lesser survival (79.8% vs 52.3% (P = .002) at five years compared to patients with lower median total calcium score (<12966.9). Also, patients with type 2 endoleaks had higher calcium scores in above the aneurysm level ((1591.2 vs 688.2), P = .05)) compared to patients with no type 2 endoleaks.
Conclusion
Calcium score assigned using a standardized Agatston scoring system can be used as a predictor of mortality risk assisting in deciding the treatment of choice for patients.
AntoniouGAAntoniouSATorellaF. Editor's choice - endovascular vs. Open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm: systematic review and meta-analysis of updated peri-operative and long term data of randomised controlled trials. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020;59(3):385-397. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.11.030.
2.
LiBKhanSSalataK, et al.A systematic review and meta-analysis of the long-term outcomes of endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2019;70(3):954-969. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2019.01.076.
3.
SidawyANPerlerBA. Rutherford’s Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2023.
4.
ChaikofELFillingerMFMatsumuraJS, et al.Identifying and grading factors that modify the outcome of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35(5):1061-1066. doi:10.1067/mva.2002.123991.
5.
RasheedKCullenJPSeamanMJ, et al.Aortic anatomic severity grade correlates with resource utilization. J Vasc Surg. 2016;63(3):569-576. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.09.043.
YoungZZBalceniukMDRasheedK, et al.Aortic anatomic severity grade correlates with midterm mortality in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;53(4):292-296. doi:10.1177/1538574419828083.
8.
BudoffMJShawLJLiuST, et al.Long-term prognosis associated with coronary calcification: observations from a registry of 25,253 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49(18):1860-1870. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.079.
9.
JurgensPTCarrJJTerryJGRanaJSDuprezDA, Association of abdominal aorta calcium and coronary artery calcium with incident cardiovascular and coronary heart disease events in black and white middle-aged people: the coronary artery risk development in young adults study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10(24):e023037. doi:10.1161/JAHA.121.023037.
10.
AgatstonASJanowitzWRHildnerFJZusmerNRViamonteMJrDetranoR. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15(4):827-832. doi:10.1016/0735-1097(90)90282-t.
11.
DetranoRCAndersonMNelsonJ, et al.Coronary calcium measurements: effect of CT scanner type and calcium measure on rescan reproducibility--MESA study. Radiology. 2005;236(2):477-484. doi:10.1148/radiol.2362040513.
12.
ChowdhuryMMZielińskiLPSunJJ, et al.Editor’s choice - calcification of thoracic and abdominal aneurysms is associated with mortality and morbidity. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018;55(1):101-108. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.11.007.
13.
VaccarinoRAbdulrasakMReschTEdsfeldtASonessonBDiasNV. Low iliofemoral calcium score may predict higher survival after EVAR and FEVAR. Ann Vasc Surg. 2020;68:283-291. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2020.04.018.
14.
JarmiTSpauldingACJebriniA, et al.Association of abdominal arterial calcification score with patients' survival and kidney allograft function after kidney transplant. World J Surg. 2022;46(10):2468-2475. doi:10.1007/s00268-022-06665-z.
15.
TerBushMJRasheedKYoungZZ, et al.Aortoiliac calcification correlates with 5-year survival after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2019;69(3):774-782. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2018.05.242.
16.
VaccarinoRWachtmeisterMSunJ, et al.Ilio-femoral calcium score may assist Glasgow Aneurysm Score prediction of long-term survival of low-risk patients after infrarenal EVAR. Int Angiol. 2022;41(4):285-291. doi:10.23736/s0392-9590.22.04883-0.
17.
Dias-NetoMNevesESousa-NunesFHenriques-CoelhoTSampaioS. Abdominal aortic aneurysm calcification: trying to identify a reliable semiquantitative method. J Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;62(1):51-58. doi:10.23736/s0021-9509.18.10132-7.
18.
SchuurmannRCOurielKMuhsBE, et al.Aortic curvature as a predictor of intraoperative type Ia endoleak. J Vasc Surg. 2016;63(3):596-602. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2015.08.110.
19.
SampaioSMPannetonJMMozesGI, et al.Proximal type I endoleak after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: predictive factors. Ann Vasc Surg. 2004;18(6):621-628. doi:10.1007/s10016-004-0100-z.
20.
KaladjiADaoudalADuménilA, et al.Predictive models of complications after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Ann Vasc Surg. 2017;40:19-27. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2016.08.020.
21.
KimMHParkHSAhnS, et al.Chronological change of the sac after endovascular aneurysm repair. Vasc Specialist Int. 2016;32(4):150-159. doi:10.5758/vsi.2016.32.4.150.
22.
O'DonnellTFXCoreyMRDeerySE, et al.Select early type IA endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair will resolve without secondary intervention. J Vasc Surg. 2018;67(1):119-125. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2017.05.096.
23.
BannoHSugimotoMSatoT, et al.New morphological factor for predicting late proximal type I endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair. Ann Vasc Surg. 2022;81:154-162. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2021.09.049.
24.
SchuurmannRCLvan NoortKOvereemSP, et al.Aortic curvature is a predictor of late type ia endoleak and migration after endovascular aneurysm repair. J Endovasc Ther. 2017;24(3):411-417. doi:10.1177/1526602817700378.
25.
PitouliasGAValdiviaARHahtapornsawanS, et al.Conical neck is strongly associated with proximal failure in standard endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2017;66(6):1686-1695. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2017.03.440.
26.
PetersenJGlodnyB. The burden of hard atherosclerotic plaques does not promote endoleak development after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: a risk stratification. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2011;34(5):918-925. doi:10.1007/s00270-010-0095-5.
27.
WainRAMarinMLOhkiT, et al.Endoleaks after endovascular graft treatment of aortic aneurysms: classification, risk factors, and outcome. J Vasc Surg. 1998;27(1):69-78. doi:10.1016/s0741-5214(98)70293-9.
28.
AlbertiniJKalliafasSTravisS, et al.Anatomical risk factors for proximal perigraft endoleak and graft migration following endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2000;19(3):308-312. doi:10.1053/ejvs.1999.1045.
29.
NanaPSpanosKKouvelosGArnaoutoglouEGiannoukasAMatsagkasM. Conical aortic neck as a predictor of outcome after endovascular aneurysm exclusion: midterm results. Ann Vasc Surg. 2023;90:77-84. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2022.11.004.
30.
GrisafiJLRahbarRNelmsJ, et al.Challenging neck anatomy is associated with need for intraoperative endovascular adjuncts during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). Ann Vasc Surg. 2011;25(6):729-734. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2011.02.028.
31.
BackMRBowserANJohnsonBLSchmachtDZwiebelBBandykDF. Patency of infrarenal aortic side branches determines early aneurysm sac behavior after endovascular repair. Ann Vasc Surg. 2003;17(1):27-34. doi:10.1007/s10016-001-0327-x.
32.
PetrikPVMooreWS. Endoleaks following endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: the predictive value of preoperative anatomic factors--a review of 100 cases. J Vasc Surg. 2001;33(4):739-744. doi:10.1067/mva.2001.112232.
33.
RaiDWisniowskiBBradshawB, et al.Abdominal aortic aneurysm calcification and thrombus volume are not associated with outcome following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Eur Radiol. 2014;24(8):1768-1776. doi:10.1007/s00330-014-3185-y.
34.
KooleDMollFLButhJ, et al.The influence of smoking on endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2012;55(6):1581-1586. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2011.12.018.
35.
LoRCBuckDBHerrmannJ, et al.Risk factors and consequences of persistent type II endoleaks. J Vasc Surg. 2016;63(4):895-901. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2015.10.088.
