Anatomical Feasibility of an Off-the-shelf Single-Renal Scalloped Stent-Graft for Hostile Neck Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Preclinical Study

Abstract

Objectives:

To evaluate the feasibility of a standardized single-renal scallop stent-graft.

Design:

Preclinical, single-center, real-world, all-comers, retrospective cohort study.

Methods:

A total of 1347 abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repairs (endovascular and open) performed between 2010 and 2020 were screened for elective treatment and retrievable preoperative high-quality computed tomography angiography (CTA) performed <6 months of the surgical procedure. Six hundred of the included CTAs involved prespecified measurements and a morphological assessment protocol (NCT05150873). The proximal sealing zones suitable for standard stent-graft implantations were further analyzed (N=547). The primary outcome assessed the feasibility of 2 single-renal scallop designs (10×10 mm and 15×10 mm, height × width). The feasibility was the inter-renal length ≥10 mm and ≥15 mm for prototypes #10 and #15, respectively. The secondary outcome quantified hypothetical length and surface improvements comparing those suitable for investigational devices implantation (study group) versus those not (control group).

Results:

Of the total, 24.7% (n=135) was feasible with prototype #10. The study versus control group sealing zones were shorter (p=0.008), with a smaller surface (p=0.009) and a higher alpha angle (p=0.039). The length and surface area increased by about 25% and 23%, respectively, (both p<0.001) within the study group and became significantly better versus the control group (standard stent-graft; both p<0.001). Of the total, 7.1% (n=39) was suitable for prototype #15. The study versus control group sealing zones were shorter (p=0.148), with a smaller surface (p=0.077) and a higher alpha angle (p=0.027). The length and surface area increased by about 34% and 31%, respectively, (both p<0.001) within the study group and became significantly higher versus the control group (standard stent-graft; both p<0.001).

Conclusions:

The use of single-renal scalloped stent-graft might be feasible in a considerable number of AAA patients. The breakthrough stands in treating hostile AAAs presenting in mismatched renal arteries, keeping the complexity of the repair as similar as possible to standard endovascular repair with a remarkable improvement in sealing.

Clinical Impact

The anatomic feasibility of a single renal stent graft for the treatment of “hostile” abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) with mismatched renal arteries was evaluated. The experimental device could be feasible in a considerable number of patients with AAA, approaching 25%, and demonstrate significant improvements in sealing. As far as we know, this is the first paper to report the prevalence of mismatched renal arteries in a large cohort of AAA patients in the real world, while proposing a dedicated device. The breakthrough is to keep the complexity of the repair as close as possible to standard endovascular repair

Keywords

aneurysm abdominal aortic aneurysm endovascular aneurysm repair

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Wanhainen

Verzini

Van Herzeele

, et al. Editor’s choice—European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2019 clinical practice guidelines on the management of abdominal aorto-iliac artery aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;57(1):8–93. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.09.020.

Chaikof

Dalman

Eskandari

, et al. The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2018;67(1):2–77.e2. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2017.10.044.

Marone

Freyrie

Ruotolo

, et al. Expert opinion on hostile neck definition in endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (a Delphi consensus). Ann Vasc Surg. 2020;62:173–182. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2019.05.049.

Muhs

Jordan

Ouriel

, et al. Matched cohort comparison of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with and without EndoAnchors. J Vasc Surg. 2018;67(6):1699–1707. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2017.10.059.

Speziale

Sirignano

Setacci

, et al. Immediate and two-year outcomes after EVAR in “on-label” and “off-label” neck anatomies using different commercially available devices. Analysis of the experience of two Italian vascular centers. Ann Vasc Surg. 2014;28(8):1892–1900. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2014.06.057.

Stather

Wild

Sayers

, et al. Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in patients with hostile neck anatomy. J Endovasc Ther. 2013;20(5):623–637. doi:10.1583/13-4320MR.1.

D’Oria

Galeazzi

Veraldi

, et al. Impact of proximal neck anatomy on short-term and mid-term outcomes after treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms with new-generation low-profile endografts. Results from the multicentric “ITAlian North-East Registry of ENDOvascular Aortic Repair With the BOltOn Treo Endograft (ITA-ENDOBOOT).” Ann Vasc Surg. 2022;80:37–49. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2021.08.059.

Eagleton

Stoner

Henretta

, et al. Safety and effectiveness of the TREO stent graft for the endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2021;74(1):114–123.e3. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2020.10.083.

Murray

Szeberin

Benevento

, et al. A comparison of clinical outcomes of abdominal aortic aneurysm patients with favorable and hostile neck angulation treated by endovascular repair with the Treovance stent graft. J Vasc Surg. 2020;71(6):1881–1889. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2019.07.096.

10.

Sveinsson

Sonesson

Kristmundsson

, et al. Long-term outcomes after fenestrated endovascular aortic repair for juxtarenal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2022;75:1164–1170. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2021.11.050.

11.

Antoniou

Torella

Editor’s choice—endovascular vs. open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm: systematic review and meta-analysis of updated peri-operative and long term data of randomised controlled trials. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020;59(3):385–397. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.11.030.

12.

Patel

Ormesher

Griffin

, et al. Editor’s choice—comparison of open, standard, and complex endovascular aortic repair treatments for juxtarenal/short neck aneurysms: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2022;63(5):696–706. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.12.042.

13.

van Keulen

Moll

Tolenaar

, et al. Validation of a new standardized method to measure proximal aneurysm neck angulation. J Vasc Surg. 2010;51(4):821–828. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2009.10.114.

14.

Silingardi

Azzoni

Giuliani

, et al. Unibody endografts for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair reduce radiation and nephrotoxic exposure compared with modular endografts. Ann Vasc Surg. 2015;29(4):751–757. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2014.11.011.

15.

Silingardi

Andreoli

Saitta

, et al. Twenty years outcomes in a single center experience after endovascular aneurysm repair with unibody endograft and anatomical fixation. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2020;61(6):720–728. doi:10.23736/S0021-9509.19.11076-2.

16.

Gennai

Andreoli

Saitta

, et al. Two decades of abdominal aortic endovascular repair with the anatomical fiXation at the aortic bifurcation in a large single-center experience. J Endovasc Ther. 2022;29(1):42–56. doi:10.1177/15266028211030537.

17.

Antoniou

Georgiadis

Antoniou

, et al. A meta-analysis of outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patients with hostile and friendly neck anatomy. J Vasc Surg. 2013;57(2):527–538. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2012.09.050.

18.

Goodney

Mao

Columbo

, et al. Use of linked registry claims data for long term surveillance of devices after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: observational surveillance study. BMJ. 2022;379:e071452. doi:10.1136/bmj-2022-071452.

19.

Keen

EN.

Origin of renal arteries from the aorta. Acta Anat (Basel). 1981;110(4):285–286. doi:10.1159/000145437.