Objective: To evaluate the qualitative impact of training in the endovascular era (post-2000) on vascular surgeons’ comfort level and enjoyment with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repairs. Methods: A sample of vascular surgeons (n = 1754) were sent a survey pertaining to their fellowship training and practice of AAA repair. The influence of training- and practice-related variables on qualitative outcomes was assessed. Results: A total of 382 (22%) surgeons completed the survey. Surgeons who performed more endovascular aneurysm repairs (EVARs) than open AAA repairs were more likely to enjoy EVAR (P < .001). Those completing fellowship after 2000 reported a higher level of procedure-related comfort with EVAR (P = .001) compared to those completing fellowship before 2000. Conversely, surgeons completing fellowship before 2000 reported a higher level of procedure-related comfort with open AAA repair (P = .001). Conclusion: The advent of EVAR has changed fellowship training of AAA repair and has translated into changes in both practice patterns and comfort level.
ParodiJCPalmazJCBaroneHD.Transfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg. 1991;5(6):491–499.
3.
WhiteRAHodgsonKJAhnSSHobson RW2ndVeithFJ.Endovascular interventions training and credentialing for vascular surgeons. J Vasc Surg. 1999;29(1):177–186.
4.
Sternbergh WC3rdYorkJWConners MS3rdMoneySR.Trends in aortic aneurysm surgical training for general and vascular surgery residents in the era of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2002;36(4):685–689.
5.
LinPHBushRLMilasM. Impact of an endovascular program on the operative experience of abdominal aortic aneurysm in vascular fellowship and general surgery residency. Am J Surg. 2003;186(2):189–193.
6.
ChoiETWybleCWRubinBG. Evolution of vascular fellowship training in the new era of endovascular techniques. J Vasc Surg. 2001;33(2 suppl):S106–S110.
7.
ArkoFRLeeWAHillBB. Impact of endovascular repair on open aortic aneurysm surgical training. J Vasc Surg. 2001;34(5):885–891.
8.
BrevettiLSNackmanGBShindelmanLECioccaRGGerard CrowleyJGrahamAM.Influence of endovascular training on fellowship and general surgical training. J Surg Res. 2003;115(1):100–105.
9.
CronenwettJL.Vascular surgery training in the United States, 1994 to 2003. J Vasc Surg. 2004;40(4):660–669.
10.
CronenwettJL.Vascular surgery training: is there enough case material?Semin Vasc Surg. 2006;19(4):187–190.
11.
SchanzerASteppacherREslamiM. Vascular surgery training trends from 2001-2007: a substantial increase in total procedure volume is driven by escalating endovascular procedure volume and stable open procedure volume. J Vasc Surg. 2009;49(5):1339–1344.
12.
EidtJFMillsJRhodesRS. Comparison of surgical operative experience of trainees and practicing vascular surgeons: A report from the Vascular Surgery Board of the American Board of Surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2010;53(4):1130–1140.
13.
McPheeJTRobinson WP3rdEslamiMH. Surgeon case volume, not institution case volume, is the primary determinant of in-hospital mortality after elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53(3):591–599.
14.
YoungELHoltPJPolonieckiJDLoftusIMThompsonMM.Meta-analysis and systematic review of the relationship between surgeon annual caseload and mortality for elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs. J Vasc Surg. 2007;46(6):1287–1294.
15.
CronenwettJL.Changes in board certification could improve vascular surgery training. J Vasc Surg. 2004;39(4):913–915.
16.
MillsJLSr. Vascular surgery training in the United States: a half-century of evolution. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48(6 suppl):90S–97S.
17.
MitchellELAroraSMonetaGL.Ensuring vascular surgical training is on the right track. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53(2):517–525.
18.
LeeJTTeshomeMde VirgilioCIshaqueBQiuMDalmanRL.A survey of demographics, motivations, and backgrounds among applicants to the integrated 0 + 5 vascular surgery residency. J Vasc Surg. 2010;51(2):496–502.
19.
CalligaroKDDoughertyMJSidawyANCronenwettJL.Choice of vascular surgery as a specialty: survey of vascular surgery residents, general surgery chief residents, and medical students at hospitals with vascular surgery training programs. J Vasc Surg. 2004;40(5):978–984.
20.
AmiotSHaulonSBecqueminJP. Fenestrated endovascular grafting: the French multicentre experience. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;39(5):537–544.
21.
VerhoevenELVourliotakisGBosWT. Fenestrated stent grafting for short-necked and juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm: an 8-year single-centre experience. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;39(5):529–536.
22.
MuhsBEVerhoevenELZeebregtsCJ. Mid-term results of endovascular aneurysm repair with branched and fenestrated endografts. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44(1):9–15.
23.
SchanzerAGreenbergRKHeveloneN. Predictors of abdominal aortic aneurysm sac enlargement after endovascular repair. Circulation. 2011;123(24):2848–2855.
24.
HillJSMcPheeJTMessinaLMCioccaRGEslamiMH.Regionalization of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: evidence of a shift to high-volume centers in the endovascular era. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48(1):29–36.
