A Case of Capability Expansion or Capability Reduction? An Exploration of Loan Recipients’ Views of ICETEX: Colombia’s Higher Education Student Loans Institute
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online January, 2022
A Case of Capability Expansion or Capability Reduction? An Exploration of Loan Recipients’ Views of ICETEX: Colombia’s Higher Education Student Loans Institute
A government-established student loans institute known as Instituto Colombiano de Credito Educativo y Estudios Tecnicos en el Exterior (ICETEX) has been instrumental in improving access to higher education in Colombia. This article uses the capability approach to analyze the ways in which ICETEX has contributed to loan recipients’ well-being and identify which capabilities loan recipients have reason to value. Evidence from qualitative interviews with eight participants reveals that, due to an intersecting set of conversion factors and capabilities, ICETEX both enables and constrains participants’ capabilities.
AltbachP. G.KnightJ. (2007). The internationalization of higher education: Motivations and realities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11, 290–305.
2.
AronowitzS.GirouxH. A. (2003). Education under siege: The conservative, liberal and radical debate over schooling. Routledge.
3.
BerryC.TaylorB. (2014). Internationalisation in higher education in Latin America: Policies and practice in Colombia and Mexico. Higher Education, 67(5), 585–601.
4.
BiggeriM. (2007). Children’s valued capabilities. In WalkerM.UnterhalterE. (Eds.), Amartya Sen’s capability approach and social justice in education (pp. 197–214). Palgrave Macmillan.
5.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
6.
BrymanA. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
7.
BrymanA.LiaoT. F.Lewis-BeckM. S. (2004). The SAGE encyclopedia of social science research methods. SAGE.
8.
CalitzT. (2018). A capability approach to participatory research platforms for young black women in South African higher education. In Lopes-FoguesA.CinF. M. (Eds.), Youth, gender and the capabilities approach to human development. Rethinking opportunities and agency from a human development perspective (pp. 55–72). Routledge.
Castaño-DuqueG. A.García-SernaL. (2012). Una revisión teórica de la calidad de la educación superior en el contexto colombiano [A theoretical review of the quality of higher education in the Colombian context]. Educación y Educadores, 15(2), 219–243.
11.
CastilloL. C. (2013). Estado de la educación superior en iberoamérica y en Colombia [The state of higher education in Latin America and Colombia]. Universidad del Valle.
12.
CastroD.Rodríguez-GómezD.GairínJ. (2017). Exclusion factors in Latin American higher education: A preliminary analyze from university governing board perspective. Education and Urban Society, 49(2), 229–247.
13.
CinF. M.WalkerM. (2016). Reconsidering girls’ education in Turkey from a capabilities and feminist perspective. International Journal of Educational Development, 49, 134–143.
14.
CohenL.ManionL.MorrisonK. (2000). Research methods in education (5th ed.). Routledge.
15.
DenscombeM. (2010). The good research guide: For small-scale social research projects (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill/Open University Press.
16.
DrezeJ.SenA. (2002). India: Development as participation. Oxford University Press.
EdwardsS.SteinerR. (2008). La revolución incompleta: Las reformas de gaviria [The incomplete revolution: Gaviria’s reforms]. Editorial Norma.
19.
EspinozaO. (2017). Paulo Freire’s ideas as an alternative to higher education neo-liberal reforms in Latin America. Journal of Moral Education, 46(4), 435–448.
20.
FernandoJ. S. A. (2011). Determinantes de la calidad de la educación media en Colombia: Un análisis de los resultados PISA 2006 y del plan sectorial “revolución educativa.” [Determinants of secondary school educational quality in Colombia: An analysis of the 2006 PISA results and the “educational revolution” sectoral plan]. Coyuntura Económica, XLI(1), 25–61.
21.
FerreyraM. M.AvitabileC.Botero ÁlvarezJ.Haimovich PazF.UrzúaS. (2017). At a crossroads. Higher education in Latin America and the Caribbean. World Bank.
22.
Flores-CrespoP. (2002). An analysis of the relationship between higher education and development by applying Sen’s human capabilities approach. The case of three technological universities in Mexico [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Department of Politics, University of York.
23.
Flores-CrespoP. (2007). Situating education in the human capabilities approach. In WalkerM.UnterhalterE. (Eds.), Amartya Sen’s capability approach and social justice in education (pp. 45–66). Palgrave Macmillan.
24.
FreireP. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Herder & Herder.
25.
GalindoC.GomezJ.RodriguezM. (2015). Repercusión del proyecto neoliberal en la educación superior en Colombia [Impact of the neoliberal project in Colombian higher education]. El Ágora USB, 2015(1), 73–94.
26.
García VillegasM.Espinosa RestrepoJ. R.Jiménez ÁngelF.David Parra HerediaJ. D. (2013). Separados y desiguales: Educación y clases sociales en Colombia [Separate and unequal: Education and social classes in Colombia]. Dejusticia.
27.
GirouxH. A. (2002). Neoliberalism, corporate culture, and the promise of higher education: The university as a democratic public sphere. Harvard Educational Review, 72(4), 425–463.
28.
GirouxH. A. (2011). Once more, with conviction: Defending higher education as a public good. Qui Parle, 20(1), 117–135.
29.
GirouxH. A. (2015). Henry Giroux on the rise of neoliberalism. Humanity & Society, 39(4), 449–455.
30.
González-VelosaC.RucciG.SarzosaM.UrzúaS. (2015). Returns to higher education in Chile and Colombia (IDB Working Paper Series No. IDB-WP-587). Inter-American Development Bank.
31.
GuerreroA.AvilésC.RuanoM. A. (2019). Free access to public Ecuadorian universities: A socioeconomically inclusive policy?Journal of Hispanic Higher Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192719853474
32.
HartC. S. (2016). How do aspirations matter?Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 17(3), 324–341.
33.
HernándezG. (2010). ¿Cuán rentable es la educación superior en Colombia? [How profitable is higher education in Colombia?] Lecturas de Economía, 73, 181–214.
Isaza-RestrepoA.Enríquez-GuerreroC.Pérez-OlmosI. (2016). Deserción y rezago académico en el programa de medicina de la [Dropping out and falling behind in the medical program at the] Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia. Revista Ciencias de la Salud, 14(2), 231–245.
36.
JacintoC.García de FanelliA. (2014). Tertiary technical education and youth integration in Brazil, Colombia and Mexico. Revue Internationale de Politique de Développement, 2014(5), 59–80.
LozanoJ.BoniA. A.PerisJ.HuesoA. (2012). Competencies in higher education: A critical analysis from the capabilities approach. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 46(1), 1321–147.
41.
MarginsonS. (2012). The “public” contribution of universities in an increasingly global world. In PusserB.KempnerK.MarginsonS.OrdorikaI. (Eds.), Universities and the public sphere: Knowledge creation and state building in the era of globalization (pp. 7–26). Routledge.
42.
MeloL.RamosJ.HernándezP. (2017). La educación superior en Colombia: Situación actual y análisis de eficiencia [Higher education in Colombia: The current situation and an efficiency analysis]. Desarrollo y Sociedad, 78, 59–111.
43.
MendozaD. C.Flores-CrespoP. (2012). Capabilidades en el bachillerato de México. Un estudio empírico [Capabilidades en el bachillerato de México. Un estudio empírico [Capabilities in Mexican high schools. An empirical study]. In TononG.AragónS. (Eds.), Desarrollo humano, educación y empleo en el siglo XXI (pp. 85–103). Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad Nacional de Lomas de Zamora
44.
Ministerio de Educación Nacional [National Ministry of Education] (2016). Permanencia en la formación técnica profesional y tecnológica, un desafío que enfrenta la educación superior. Boletín Educación Superior en Cifras, 2016, 1–3.
MontenegroJ. (1994). La educación superior en Colombia [Higher education in Colombia]. Revista de la Educación Superior, 92, 1–33.
47.
Nel PáezP.TeelkenC. (2016). Perceived quality of private education and fears of stratification: Investigating the propositions of human capital theory by exploring the case of Colombia. Policy Futures in Education, 14(6), 597–616.
48.
NovelliM. (2010). Education, conflict and social (in)justice: Insights from Colombia. Educational Review, 62(3), 271–285.
49.
NussbaumM. C. (2001). Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge University Press.
50.
NussbaumM. C. (2005). Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice. In AgarwalB.HumphriesJ.RobeynsI. (Eds.), Amartya Sen’s work and ideas—A gender perspective (pp. 35–62). Routledge.
51.
NussbaumM. C. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Harvard University Press.
PeraltaJ. S.PachecoT. (2014). Resisting “progress”: The new left and higher education in Latin America. American Political Science Association, 47(3), 620–623.
57.
Pineda-BáezC.Bermúdez-AponteJ.Rubiano-BelloÁ.Pava-GarcíaN.Suárez-GarcíaR.Cruz-BecerraF. (2014). Students engagement and academic performance in the Colombian University context. RELIEVE, 20(2), Article 3.
58.
RabossiM. (2009). Two different organizational reactions: The university sector in Argentina and Colombia and the neoliberal proposal. Policy Futures in Education, 7(5), 532–543.
RizviS.EngelL. C. (2009). Neo-liberal globalization, educational policy, and the struggle for social justice. In AyersW.QuinnT.StovallD. (Eds.), Handbook of social justice in education (pp. 529–541). Routledge.
RobeynsI. (2005a). The capability approach: A theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development, 6(1), 93–117.
63.
RobeynsI. (2005b). Selecting capabilities for quality of life measurement. Social Indicators Research, 74(1), 191–215.
64.
SalazarN.MesaC. A.CorreaC. (2016). Financiación de la educación superior a través del ICETEX: Estimación de necesidades de recursos a futuro y propuestas de mecanismos de fondeo [The funding of higher education via ICETEX: An estimation of the future resource needs and proposals for funding mechanisms]. Fedesarrollo, 128. http://www.repository.fedesarrollo.org.co/handle/11445/3303
65.
SaldanaJ. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE.
66.
SanzR.PerisJ. A.EscámezJ. (2017). Higher education in the fight against poverty from the capabilities approach: The case of Spain. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 2(2), 53–66.
67.
SenA. (1992). Inequality reexamined. Oxford University Press.
68.
SenA. (1997). Editorial: Human capital and human capability. World Development, 25(12), 1959–1961.
69.
SenA. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.
70.
SenA. (2005). Human rights and capabilities. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 6(2), 151–166.
71.
SenA. (2009). The idea of justice. Allen Lane & Harvard University Press.
72.
SenA. (2013). The ends and means of sustainability. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 14(1), 6–20.
TerziL. (2007). The capability to be educated. In WalkerM.UnterhalterE. (Eds.), Amartya Sen’s capability approach and social justice in education (pp. 25–44). Palgrave Macmillan.
77.
TononG.AragónS.RinaldiS. (2012). Calidad de vida y satisfacción con la educación de posgrado: Un estudio desde la mirada de los sujetos [Life quality and satisfaction with postgraduate education: A study from the subjects’ perspective]. In TononG.AragónS. (Eds.) Desarrollo humano, educación y empleo en el siglo XXI [Human development, education and employment in the 21st century] (pp. 37–48). Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad Nacional de Lomas de Zamora.
78.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (1998). World declaration on higher education for the twenty-first century: Vision and action. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000141952
79.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2016). Global education monitoring report, 2016: Place: Inclusive and sustainable cities [PDF file]. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000246230
80.
UnterhalterE. (2003). The capabilities approach and gendered education: An examination of South African complexities. Theory and Research in Education, 1(1), 7–22.
81.
UnterhalterE.BrighouseH. (2007). Distribution of what for social justice in education? The case of education for all by 2015. In WalkerM.UnterhalterE. (Eds.), Amartya Sen’s capability approach and social justice in education (pp. 67–88). Palgrave Macmillan.
82.
ValeroA.Van ReenenJ. (2019). The economic impact of universities: Evidence from across the globe. Economics of Education Review, 68, 53–67.
83.
VaughanR.WalkerM. (2012). Capabilities, values and education policy. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 13(3), 495–512.
84.
WalkerM. (2006). Higher education pedagogies: A capabilities approach. Open University Press.
85.
WalkerM. (2008). Widening participation; widening capability. London Review of Education, 63(3), 267–279.
86.
WalkerM. (2012). A capital or capabilities education narrative in a world of staggering inequalities?International Journal of Educational Development, 32(3), 384–393.
87.
WalkerM.MkwananziF. (2015). Challenges in accessing higher education: A case study of marginalised young people in one South African informal settlement. International Journal of Educational Development, 40, 40–49.
88.
WalkerM.UnterhalterE. (2007). Amartya Sen’s capability approach and social justice in education. Palgrave Macmillan.
89.
WattsM. (2009). Sen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance: Adaptive Preferences and Higher Education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 28(5), 425-436.
90.
Wilson-StrydomM. (2011). University access for social justice: A capabilities perspective. South African Journal of Education, 31(3), 407–418.
91.
Wilson-StrydomM. (2015). University access and theories of social justice: Contributions of the capabilities approach. Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education and Educational Planning, 69(1), 143–155.
92.
Wilson-StrydomM. (2016). A capabilities list for equitable transitions to university: A top-down and bottom-up approach. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 17(2), 145–160.
93.
Wilson-StrydomM. (2017). Disrupting structural inequalities of higher education opportunity: “Grit,” resilience and capabilities at a South African University. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 18(3), 384–398.
