This research examined challenges, choices, and decisions of women professors in higher education. Special attention was given to Latina professors. This article reviewed the literature on established theories of representative bureaucracy and contextualized faculty women, especially Latinas, in this proportional representation framework. Answers were sought to three research questions: Are Hispanic, Black, and Asian women keeping pace with their White peers in higher education; are women as a group in higher education keeping pace with their male counterparts; and what obstacles, if any, must female professors overcome? Study results suggest that although women comprise nearly half of all postsecondary teachers, they are not keeping pace with White males in terms of promotion to tenured professorships. Education demographics illustrate that Latinas, in particular, are not achieving tenure and promotion and are not proportionately represented in higher education suggesting that mentoring may be a key variable to promotion within higher education.
BarabusJ. (2004). How deliberation affects public opinions. American Political Science Review, 98, 687-701.
4.
BarkerV. (2006). The politics of punishing: How institutionalized power, activist governance and citizen participation matters to the rise and fall of incarceration. Punishment & Society, 8, 5-32.
BreretonT. F. (1977). The problems of race and sex in public agency staffs. Public Administration Review, 37, 604-607.
7.
Castillo-MontoyaM.Torres-GuzmánM. E. (2012). Thriving in our identity and in the academy: Latina epistemology as a core resource. Harvard Educational Review, 82, 540-558.
8.
CayerN. J.SigelmanL. (1980). Minorities and women in state and local government: 1973-1975. Public Administration Review, 40, 443-450.
9.
ColJ. M. (1985). Barriers to women’s advancement in administration and management. Unpublished manuscript, Sangamon State University, Springfield, IL.
10.
CrowleyJ. E. (2013). Rutgers today (Public Policy Update from the Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy). Retrieved from http://policy.rutgers.edu/
11.
Delgado-RomeroE. A.ManloveA. N.ManloveJ. D.HernandezC. A. (2007). Controversial issues in the recruitment and retention of Latino/a faculty. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 6, 34-51. Retrieved from jhh.sagepub.com
12.
De LucaS. M.EscotoE. R. (2012). The recruitment and support of Latino faculty for tenure and promotion. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 11, 29-40. doi:10.1177/1538192711435552
13.
DolanJ. A.RosenbloomD. H. (2003). Representative bureaucracy. New York, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
14.
EaglyA. H.CarliL. L. (2012). Women and the labyrinth of leadership. In RosenbachW. E.TaylorR. L.YoundtM. A. (Eds.), Contemporary issues in leadership (7th ed., pp. 147-162). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
15.
GilliomJ. (2001). Overseers of the poor: Surveillance, resistance, and the limits of privacy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
16.
GonzálezJ. C. (2006). Academic socialization experiences of Latina doctoral students. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 5, 347-365.
17.
GuanipaC.Santa-CruzR. M.ChaoG. (2003). Retention, tenure, and promotion of Hispanic faculty in colleges of education: Working towards success within the higher education system. Journal of Higher Education, 2, 187-202.
18.
HaleM. M. (1987). Gender differences in career advancement in the public sector (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Arizona State University, Tempe.
19.
HaleM. M.KellyR. M. (1989). Gender, bureaucracy, & democracy. New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
HuneS. (1998). Asian Pacific American women in higher education: Claiming visibility and voice. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
22.
IbarraR. A. (2003). Latino/a faculty and the tenure process in cultural context. In JonesL.CastellanosJ. (Eds.), The majority in the minority: Retaining Latino/o faculty, administrators, and students in the 21st century (pp. 207-219). Sterling, VA: Stylus Books.
23.
KaufmanH. (2012). Administrative decentralization and political power. In ShafrtizJ. M.HydeA. C. (Eds.), Classics of public administration (7th ed., pp. 264-276). Boston, MA: Wadsworth Cengage.
24.
KellermanB.RhodeD. L. (2012). Viable options. In RosenbachW. E.TaylorR. L.YoundtM. A. (Eds.), Contemporary issues in leadership (7th ed., pp. 135-145). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
25.
KingsleyJ. D. (1944). Representative bureaucracy. Yellow Springs, OH: Antioch Press.
26.
KnouseS. B.RosenfeldP.CulbertsonA. L. (Eds.). (1992). Hispanics in the workplace. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
27.
KouzesJ. M.PosnerB. Z. (2012). Leadership begins with an inner journey. In RosenbachW. E.TaylorR. L.YoundtM. A. (Eds.), Contemporary issues in leadership (pp. 117-123). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
MendelbergT. (1997). Executing hortons: Racial crime in the 1988 presidential campaign. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61, 134-157.
31.
MitchellS. M.HesliV.L. (2013). Women don’t ask? Women don’t say no? Bargaining and service in the political science profession. Political Science & Politics, 46(2), 355-369.
32.
Mkandawire-ValhmuL.KakoP. M.StevensP. E. (2010). Mentoring women faculty of color in nursing academia: Creating an environment that supports scholarly growth and retention. Nursing Outlook, 58, 135-141. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2010.02.001
33.
MonfortiJ. L.MichelsonM. R. (2008). Diagnosing the leaky pipeline: Continuing barriers to the retention of Latinas and Latinos in political science. Political Science & Politics, 41, 161-166.
34.
MosesE. (1997). The registered nurse population: Findings from the National Sample Survey of Registered Nurses 1996. Rockville, MD: Health Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
35.
NavarroT.WilliamsB.AhmadA. (2013). Sitting at the kitchen table: Fieldnotes from women of color in anthropology. Cultural Anthropology, 28, 443-463. doi:10.1111/cuan.12013
36.
Nieves-SquiresS. (1991). Hispanic women: Making their presence on campus less tenuous. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
37.
NuñezA. M.Murakami-RamalhoE. (2012). The demographic dividend: Why the success of Latino faculty and students is critical (American Association of University Professors). Retrieved from http://www.aaup.org/article/demographic-dividend#.Uw0UTIWhbME
38.
OkinS. M. (1991). Justice, gender and the family. New York, NY: Basic Books.
39.
Ortega-ListonR. (1999a). Affirmative action policies and workplace discrimination: Perceived effects on the careers of Mexican Americans in municipal administration. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 6(3), 49-57.
40.
Ortega-ListonR. (1999b). Can mentoring mean the difference between success and failure for Mexican American professionals?Journal of Public Management & Social Policy, 5(2), 1-9.
41.
Ortega-ListonR. (2001). Mexican American professionals in municipal administration: Do they really lag behind in terms of education, seniority, and on-the-job-training?Public Personnel Management, 30, 197-210.
42.
PittmanC. T. (2010). Race and gender oppression in the classroom: The experiences of women faculty of color with white male students. Teaching Sociology, 38, 183-196.
43.
PonjuanL. (2011). Recruiting and retaining Latino faculty members: The missing piece to Latino student success. Thought & Action, 27, 99-110.
44.
ReddyM. T.TuSmithB. (Eds.). (2002). Race in the college classroom: Pedagogy and politics. Newark, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
45.
Rios-EllisB.RascónM.GalvezG.Inzunza-FrancoG.BellamyL.TorresA. (2012). Creating a model of Latino peer education: Weaving cultural capital into the fabric of academic services in an urban university setting. Education and Urban Society, 45(6), 1-23. doi:10.1177/0013124512468006
46.
SabharwalM.CorleyE. A. (2009). Faculty job satisfaction across gender and discipline. The Social Science Journal, 46, 539-556.
SchwartzF. N. (1989). Management women and the new facts of life. Harvard Business Review, 67(1), 65-76.
49.
SchwartzF. N. (with ZimmermanJ.). (1992). Breaking with tradition: Women and work, the new facts of life. New York, NY: Warner Books.
50.
SilversteinH. (2009). Girls on the stand: How the courts fail pregnant minors. New York, NY: New York University Press.
51.
SpiegelF. Z. (1993). Women’s wages, women’s worth: Politics, religion, and equity. New York, NY: Continuum.
52.
TaussigF. W.JoslynC. S. (1932). American business leaders. New York, NY: Macmillan.
53.
TurnerC. S. V.GonzálezJ. C.WoodJ. L. (2008). Faculty of color in academe: What 20 years of literature tells us. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 1, 139-168. doi:/10.1037/a0012837
54.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences. (2013). Full-time instructional faculty in degree-granting institutions, by race/ethnicity, sex, and academic rank: Fall 2007, fall 2009, and fall 2011. The condition of education 2013, reference tables supplement, (Report NCES 2013-037). Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d12/tables/dt12_291.asp
55.
VertzL. L. (1985). Women, occupational advancement, and mentoring. Public Administration Review, 45, 415-423.
56.
VertzL. L. (1986). Pay inequalities between women and men in state and local government: An examination of the political context of the comparable worth controversy. Women & Politics, 7(2), 43-57.
57.
VillaseñorM. J.ReyesM. E.MuñozI. (2013). Mujerista mentoring for Chicanas/Latinas in higher education. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 15(1), 49-64.
58.
WarnerW. L.AbegglenJ. C. (1955). Occupational mobility in American business and industry. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
59.
WeberM. (1946). From Max Weber: Essays in sociology (GerthH. H.MillsC. W., Trans.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
