This article reviews the current model of governance within Spanish universities, focusing on the areas of state regulation, academic goals, and organizational management. A qualitative approach was adopted for this research, comprising the use of a survey and a focus group. The conclusions of this study provide some insights into the new governance models being applied in Spanish universities and the implications of these models for academics, managers, and policy makers.
AmaralA.MagelhãesA. (2002). The emergent role of external stakeholders. In AmaralA.JonesG. A.KarsethB. (Eds.), Governing higher education: National perspectives on institutional governance (pp.1-23). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers
2.
CastroD.IonG. (2011). Dilemas en el gobierno de las universidades españolas [Government dilemmas in the Spanish universities: autonomy, structure, participation and desconcentration]. Revista de Educación, 355, 161-186.
3.
CastroD.TomàsM. (2010). El desempeño de la dirección en la Universidad [Management performance at universities: the case of deans and department head]. Educación XX1, 2, 217-239.
4.
CastroD.TomàsM. (2011). Development of manager-academics at institutions of higher education in Catalonia. Higher Education Quarterly, 65(3), 290-307.
5.
ClarkB. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities. Organizational pathways of transformation. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
6.
DeemR.BrehonyK. (2005). Management as ideology: The case of “new managerialism” in higher education. Oxford Review of Education, 31, 217-235.
7.
DeemR.HillyardS.ReedM. (2007). Knowledge, higher education, and the new managerialism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
8.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.). (2005). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
European Commission. (2006). Delivering on the modernisation agenda for universities: Education, research and innovation. Brussels, Belgium: Author.
10.
FlickU. (2004). Introducción a la investigación cualitativa [Introduction to the qualitative research]. Madrid, Spain: Morata.
11.
GodinB. (2003). The knowledge based economy: Conceptual framework or buzzword? Project on history and sociology of S&T statistic. Working Paper, 23, 85-92.
12.
JongbloedB.EndersJ.SalernoC. (2008). Higher education and its communities: Interconnections, interdependencies and a research agenda. Higher Education, 56, 303-324.
13.
LarsenI. MMaassenP.StensakerB. (2009). Four basic dilemmas in university governance reform. Higher Education Management and Policy, 21, 41-58.
14.
LazersonM. (2010). Higher education and the American dream: Success and its discontents. Budapest, Hungary: Central European University Press
15.
LeporiB.JongbloedB.SalernoC.SlipersaeterS. (2007). Changing patterns of funding of European higher education institutions. In BonaccorsiA.DaraioC. (Eds.), Universities and strategic knowledge creation. Specialization and performance in Europe (pp. 304-354). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
16.
McGuinnessA. C. (2005). The states and higher education. In AltbachP. G.BerdahlR. O.GumportP. J. (Eds.), American higher education in the twenty-first century: Social, political, and economic challenges (pp. 198-225). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
17.
Meister-ScheyttC. (2007). Reinventing governance: The role of boards of governors in the New Austrian University. Tertiary Education and Management, 13, 247-261.
18.
MichavilaF.EmbidA. (2001). Hacia una nueva universidad [Toward a new university]. Madrid, Spain: Tecnos.
19.
MintzbergH. (1984). La estructuración de las Organizaciones [A typology of organizational structure]. Barcelona, Spain: Ariel.
20.
Mora RuizJ. G. (2001). Governance and management in the new university. Tertiary Education and Management, 7, 95-110.
21.
NeaveG. (1998). The evaluative state re-considered. European Journal of Education, 33, 265-284.
22.
ParadeiseC.RealeE.BleiklieI.FerlieE. (Eds.). (2009). University governance. Western European comparative perspective. New York, NY: Springer.
23.
PérezF.PeiróJ. M. (1999). El Sistema de Gobierno de la Universidad Española [The governance system of the Spanish University]. Madrid, Spain: Secretaria General del Consejo de Universidades.
24.
RandleK.BradyN. (1997). Further education and the new managerialism. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 21, 229-239.
25.
SoléF.CollJ. (1999). The responses of higher education institutions to global challenge: Innovative universities and human resources development. Higher Education in Europe, 24, 67-79.
26.
TaylorJ. (2006). “Big is beautiful”: Organisational change in universities in the United Kingdom. New models of institutional management and the changing role of academic staff. Higher Education in Europe, 31, 251-273.
27.
TierneyW. (2004). Competing conceptions of academic governance. Negotiating the perfect storm. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press
28.
TomaD. (2007). Expanding peripheral activities, increasing accountability demands and reconsidering governance in US higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 26(1), 57-72.
29.
WhitchurchC. (2006). Who do they think they are? The changing identities of professional administrators and managers in UK higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 28, 159-171.
30.
WoodfieldS.KennieT. (2007). Top team structures in UK higher education institutions: Composition, challenges, and changes. Tertiary Education and Management, 13, 331-348.
