This exploratory study illustrates the differences in achievement between Latino college-bound students compared to their White counterparts with respect to key background and achievement variables. This research presents the gaps in “inputs” that Latino students possess regarding disparate income, parent education levels, access to Advanced Placement courses, and performance on standardized exams. The author presents descriptive statistics on college-going students, comparing Latino students to other high school test takers in the country.
Blanco, C. (2004, August 23). Knocking at the college door. Presentation for Montana Roundtable on Accelerated Learning, Kalispell, MT.
2.
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
3.
Camara, W., & Echternacht, G. (2000). The SAT I and high school grades: Utility in predicting success in college (College Board Report No. RN-10). New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
4.
College Entrance Examination Board. (2003). Background on the 1,406,324 SAT takers in the class of 2003. New York: Author.
5.
Contreras, F. (2003). College admissions in the affirmative action era and post Proposition 209: Assessing the impact of public policy on college access in California. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.
6.
Contreras, F., & Gándara, P. (in press). Latinas/os in the Ph.D. pipeline: A case of historical and contemporary exclusion. In J. Castellanos & A. Gloria (Eds.), Journey to a Ph.D.: The Latina/o experience in higher education. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
7.
DiMaggio, P. (1982). Cultural capital and school success: The impact of status culture participation on the grades of U.S. high school students. American Sociological Review, 47, 189-201.
8.
Gándara, P. (1995). Over the Ivy walls: The educational mobility of low-income Chicanos. Albany: State University of New York Press.
9.
Jencks, C., & Phillips, M. (1998). The Black-White test score gap. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
10.
McDonough, P. (1994). Buying and selling higher education: The social construction of the college applicant. Journal of Higher Education, 65, 427-446.
11.
Oakes, J., Mendoza, J., & Silver, D. (in press). California opportunity indicators: Monitoring equity in college access. In P. Gándara & G. Orfield (Eds.), Confronting the crisis in equity in higher education. Albany: State University of New York Press.
12.
Olneck, M. (2000). Can multicultural education change what counts as cultural capital?American Educational Research Journal, 27(2), 317-348.
13.
Schmidt, A., & Camara, W. (2004). Group differences in standardized test scores and other educational indicators. In R. Zwick (Ed.), Rethinking the SAT (pp. 189-201). New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
14.
Snyder, T., & Hoffman, C. M. (2002). Digest of education statistics 2001 (NCES Pub. Report No. 2002130). Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.
15.
Teranishi, R., Solorzano, D., & Allen, W. (2004, November). Opportunity at the crossroads: Racial inequality, school segregation, and higher education in California. Teachers College Record, 106(11), 2224.
16.
Valencia, R. (2002). Chicano school failure and success. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
17.
Wang, B., Kobrin, J., & Zhou, Y. (2004, April 4). A 12-year perspective on the SAT performance of Asian American and Pacific Islander students. Paper presented at the meeting of the Asian Pacific American Higher Education Association Conference, San Francisco, CA.
18.
Zwick, R. (2004). Rethinking the SAT. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
