The study's purpose was to extend the research dealing with the influence of grades on student evaluation of teaching (SET). Fifty-four college faculty served as study participants. Discriminate analysis indicated that a student with a higher expected course grade would give a higher SET rating of teaching effectiveness. This finding is consistent with that reported at institutions with predominantly White, non-Hispanic enrollments.
Baldwin, T., & Blattner, N. (2003). Guarding against potential bias in student evaluations. College Teaching,51, 27-31.
2.
Bonesronning, H. (1999). The variation in teachers' grading practices: Causes and consequences. Economics of Education Review,18, 89-105.
3.
Boretz, E. (2004). Grade inflation and the myth of student consumerism. College Teaching,52, 44-49.
4.
Brown, D. L. (1976). Faculty ratings and student grades: A university-wide multiple regression analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology,68, 573-578.
5.
Cuadraz, G. H. (2005). Chicanas and higher education: Three decades of literature and thought. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education,4, 215-234.
6.
d'Apollonia, S., & Abrami, P. C. (1997). Navigating student ratings of instruction. American Psychologist,52, 1198-1208.
7.
Ellis, L., Burke, D. M., Lomire, P., & McCormack, D. R. (2003). Student grades and average ratings of instructional quality: The need for adjustment. Journal of Educational Research,97, 35-40.
8.
Feldman, K. A. (1997). Identifying exemplary teachers and teaching: Evidence from student ratings. In R. P. Perry & J. C. Smart (Eds.),Effective teaching in higher education: Research and practice(pp. 368-395). New York: Agathon.
9.
Greenwald, A. G., & Gillmore, G. M. (1997). Grading leniency is a removable contaminant of student ratings. American Psychologist,52, 1209-1217.
10.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
11.
Howell, A. J., & Symbaluk, D. G. (2001). Published student ratings of instruction: Revealing and reconciling the views of students and faculty. Journal of Educational Psychology,93, 790-796.
12.
Hutado, S., & Kamimura, M. (2003). Latina/o retention in four-year institutions. In J. Castellanos & L. Jones (Eds.),The majority in the minority: Expanding the representation of Latina/o faculty, administrators, and students in higher education(pp. 139-150). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
13.
Koon, J., & Murray, H. G. (1996). Using multiple outcomes to validate student ratings of overall teacher effectiveness. Journal of Higher Education,66, 61-81.
14.
Krautmann, A. C., & Sander, W. (1999). Grades and student evaluations of teachers. Economics of Education Review,18, 59-63.
15.
Lopez-Isa, J. (2005). Top 100 4-year colleges by Hispanic enrollment. Hispanic Outlook,15, 11-25.
16.
Lueck, T. L., Endres, K./L., & Caplan, R. E. (1993). The interaction effects of gender on teaching evaluations. Journalism Education,48, 46-54.
17.
Marsh, H. W. (1987). Students' evaluations of university teaching: Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research. International Journal of Educational Research,11(3), 1-48.
18.
Marsh, H. W. (2001). Distinguishing between good (useful) and bad workloads on students' evaluations of teaching. American Educational Research Journal,38, 183-212.
19.
Marsh, H. W., & Roche, L. A. (1997). Making students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective. American Psychologist,52, 1187-1197.
20.
Marsh, H. W., & Roche, L. A. (2000). Effects of grading leniency and low workloads on students' evaluations of teaching: Popular myth, bias, validity or innocent bystanders?Journal of Educational Psychology,92, 202-208.
21.
McKeachie, W. J. (1997). Student ratings: The validity of use. American Psychologist,52, 1218-1225.
22.
Neath, I. (1996). How to improve your teaching evaluations without improving your teaching. Psychological Reports,78, 1363-1372.
23.
Potter, W., & Nyman, M. (2001). Be careful what you wish for: Analysis of grading trends at a small liberal arts college. College and University: The Journal of the American Association of Collegiate Registrars,76, 9-14.
24.
Scriven, M. (1988). The validity of student ratings. Instructional Evaluation,9, 5-18.
25.
Shoichet, C. E. (2002). Reports of grade inflation may be inflated, study finds. The Chronicle of Higher Education,48, A37-A37.
26.
Sojka, J., Gupta, A. K., & Deeter-Schmelz, D. R. (2002). Student and faculty perceptions of student evaluations of teaching. College Teaching,50, 44-49.
27.
Stumpf, S. A., & Freedman, R. D. (1979). Expected grade covariance with student ratings of instruction: Individual versus class effects. Journal of Educational Psychology,71, 293-302.
28.
Tang, S. (1999). Student evaluation of teachers: Effects of grading at college level. Journal of Research and Development in Education,32, 83-88.
