Unconditional quantile regression has quickly become popular after being introduced by Firpo, Fortin, and Lemieux (2009, Econometrica 77: 953–973) and is easily implemented using the user-written command rifreg by the same authors. However, including high-dimensional fixed effects in rifreg is quite burdensome and sometimes even impossible. In this article, I show that when the number of fixed effects is large, the computational speed is massively increased by using xtreg rather than regress to fit the unconditional quantile regression models. I also introduce the xtrifreg command, which should be considered a supplement to rifreg. The xtrifreg command has many of the same features as rifreg but can be used to include a large number of fixed effects, to estimate cluster–robust standard errors, and to estimate cluster–bootstrapped standard errors.
BorgenN. T.2015. Changes in the economic returns to attending prestigious institutions in Norway. European Societies17: 219–241.
3.
BudigM. J., and HodgesM. J.2014. Statistical models and empirical evidence for differences in the motherhood penalty across the earnings distribution. American Sociological Review79: 358–364.
4.
CameronA. C., and MillerD. L.2015. A practitioner's guide to cluster–robust inference. Journal of Human Resources50: 317–372.
5.
CameronA. C., and TrivediP. K.2009. Microeconometrics Using Stata.College Station, TX: Stata Press.
6.
CardD., ChettyR., FeldsteinM. S., and SaezE.2010. Expanding access to administrative data for research in the United States. American Economic Association, Ten Years and Beyond: Economists Answer NSF's Call for Long-Term Research Agendas.
7.
CastellanoK. E., and HoA. D.2013. Contrasting OLS and quantile regression approaches to student “growth” percentiles. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics38: 190–215.
8.
EinavL., and LevinJ. D.2013. The data revolution and economic analysis. NBER Working Paper No. 19035, The National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w19035.
9.
FirpoS., FortinN. M., and LemieuxT.2009. Unconditional quantile regressions. Econometrica77: 953–973.
10.
FrölichM., and MellyB.2010. Estimation of quantile treatment effects with Stata. Stata Journal10: 423–457.
11.
GuimarãesP., and PortugalP.2010. A simple feasible procedure to fit models with high-dimensional fixed effects. Stata Journal10: 628–649.
12.
HaoL., and NaimanD. Q.2007. Quantile Regression.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
KillewaldA., and BearakJ.2014. Is the motherhood penalty larger for low-wage women? A comment on quantile regression. American Sociological Review79: 350–357.
14.
KoenkerR.2005. Quantile Regression.New York: Cambridge University Press.
15.
McCaffreyD. F., LockwoodJ. R., MihalyK., and SassT. R.2012. A review of Stata commands for fixed-effects estimation in normal linear models. Stata Journal12: 406–432.
16.
PorterS. R.2015. Quantile regression: Analyzing changes in distributions instead of means. In Higher Education, Vol. 30: Handbook of Theory and Research, ed. PaulsenM. B., 335–381. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
17.
SchafferM. E.2005. xtivreg2: Stata module to perform extended IV/2SLS, GMM and AC/HAC, LIML, and k-class regression for panel-data models. Statistical Software Components S456501, Department of Economics, Boston College. https://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s456501.html.
