Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Acts of bioterrorism, such as the “anthrax letters” in 2001, exposed public health professionals to potentially high concentrations of unknown biological organisms. After an event such as the “anthrax letters,” it became apparent that public health professionals require continual training and knowledge about proper biological safety level 3 (BSL-3) practices and procedures. To assess specific content areas where training was needed, public health professionals in northeast Ohio were given an original assessment. Prior needs assessments had warranted the development of three 2-day courses based on BSL-3 practices and government regulations. These courses stimulated learning by combining open-ended questioning and hands-on exercises to promote group discussion. Testing instruments were administered before and after the courses and analyzed by paired t-test to assess improvement in participant knowledge. Five questions from this test were used as content measures to assess learning in specific content areas. Learner attitudes were assessed following course completion via survey data. Participants averaged 67.7% ± 9.2 on testing instruments prior to courses as compared to 86.0% ± 8.6, following course completion (p < 0.001). Improvement was significant (p < 0.05) in all content areas measured. Eighty-two percent of participants responded that they would change their practices based on information learned from the course. These data coupled with learner attitudes demonstrate a significant increase in participant knowledge among public health professionals and a willingness to change existing practices through the integration of new concepts.

Keywords

Biosafety laboratorians active-learning continuing education bioterrorism

References

American Society for Microbiology (ASM). (2007). Biosafety standards and training. Microbe, 2, 580–581.

Atlas

R. M.

(2005). Biosecurity concerns: Changing the face of academic research. Chemical Health and Safety, 12, 15–23.

Baker

E. L.

Jr , Potter

M. A.

, Jones

D. L.

, Mercer

S. L.

, Cioffi

J. P.

, Green

L. W.

(2005). The public health infrastructure and our nation's health. Annual Review of Public Health, 26, 303–318.

Berger

K. M.

, Pinard

, Frankel

M. S.

, Lee

E. C.

(2009). Workforce development: Preparing the next generation for infectious disease threats. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2012). Emergency preparedness and response. Available at: http://emergency.cdc.gov/cdcpreparedness/cphp/index.asp. Accessed online 2012.

Damon

(1984). Peer education: The untapped potential. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 5, 331–343.

Fiester

, Redfearn

, Helfinstine

, Meilander

, Woolverton

C. J.

(2010). Lab safety and bioterrorism readiness curricula using active learning and hands-on strategies as continuing education for medical technologists. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 11, 14–20.

Fink

(2003). Biotechnology research in an age of terrorism: Confronting the dual use dilemma. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Harding

A. L.

, Byers

K. B.

(2006). Epidemiology of laboratory-associated infections. In Fleming

D. O.

, Hunt

D. L.

(eds.), Biological safety: Principles and practices (pp. 53–75). Washington, DC: ASM Press.

10.

Hartwig

K. A.

, Burich

, Cannon

, Massari

, Mueller

, Dembry

(2009). Critical challenges ahead in bioterrorism preparedness training for clinicians. Prehospital & Disaster Medicine, 24, 47–53.

11.

Jernigan

D. B.

, Raghunathan

P. L.

, Bell

B. P.

, Brechner

, Bresnitz

E. A.

, Butler

J. C.

(2002). Investigation of bioterrorism-related anthrax, United States, 2001: Epidemiologic findings. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 8, 1019–1028.

12.

Jernigan

J. A.

, Stephens

D. S.

, Ashford

D. A.

, Omenaca

, Topiel

M. S.

, Galbraith

(2001). Bioterrorism-related inhalational anthrax: The first 10 cases reported in the United States. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 7, 933–944.

13.

Kaiser

(2007). Biosafety breaches: Accidents spur a closer look at risks at biodefense labs. Science, 317, 1852–1854.

14.

Kaiser

(2011). Taking stock of the biodefense boom. Science, 333, 1214–1215.

15.

Kiltz

(2009). Developing critical thinking skills in homeland security and emergency management courses. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 6, 1–23.

16.

Klietmann

W. F.

, Ruoff

K. L.

(2001). Bioterrorism: Implications for the clinical microbiologist. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 14, 364–381.

17.

Lawler

(2005). Biodefense labs: Boston University under fire for pathogen mishap. Science, 307, 501.

18.

Marbach-Ad

, McGinnis

J. R.

, Dai

A. H.

, Pease

, Schalk

K. A.

, Benson

(2009). Promoting science for all by way of student interest in a transformative undergraduate microbiology laboratory for nonmajors. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 10, 58–67.

19.

Marmagas

S. W.

, King

L. R.

, Chuk

M. G.

(2003). Public health's response to a changed world: September 11, biological terrorism, and the development of an environmental health tracking network. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1226–1230.

20.

McHugh

, Staiti

A. B.

, Felland

L. E.

(2004). How prepared are Americans for public health emergencies? Twelve communities weigh In. Health Affairs, 23, 201–209.

21.

Paul

R. W.

, Binker

A. J. A.

(1990). Critical thinking: What every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world. Rohnert Park, CA: Sonoma State University Center for Critical Thinking and Moral Critique.

22.

Schwellenbach

(2005). Biodefense: A plague of researchers. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 61, 14–16.

23.

Severiens

S. E.

, Schmidt

H. G.

(2009). Academic and social integration and study progress in problem based learning. Higher Education, 58, 59–69.

24.

Sewell

D. L.

(2006). Laboratory-acquired infections: Are microbiologists at risk?. Clinical Microbiology Newsletter, 28, 1–6.

25.

Snyder

J. W.

(2003). Role of the hospital-based microbiology laboratory in preparation for and response to a bioterrorism event. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 41, 1–4.

26.

Steinbruner

J. D.

, Harris

E. D.

(2003). Controlling dangerous pathogens. Issues in Science and Technology, 19, 47–54.

27.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, & National Institutes of Health. (2009). Biosafety in microbiological and biomedical laboratories (5th ed.). Chosewood

L. C.

, Wilson

D. E.

(Eds.). Available at: www.cdc.gov/od/ohs/biosfty/bmbl5/bmbl5toc.htm.

28.

U.S. House of Representatives, 107th Congress, 2nd Session. (2002). H.R. 3448 Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness Response Act of 2002 [introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives, January 23, 2002]. U.S. Government Printing Office. Available at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-107publ188/html/PLAW-107publ188. pdf. Accessed online 2012.

29.

U.S. Senate, 111th Congress, 1st Session. (2009). S. 485, Select Agent Program and Biosafety Improvement Act of 2009 [introduced in the U.S. Senate; February 26, 2009]. U.S. Government Printing Office. Available at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-111s485is/pdf/BILLS-111s485is. pdf. Accessed online 2012.

30.

Weisfuse

I. B.

(2009). Public health infrastructure. In Lutwick

L. I.

, Lutwick

S. M.

(eds.), Beyond anthrax: The weaponization of infectious disease (pp. 225–237). New York: Humana Press.

Administering Needs-Assessed Bioterrorism Curricula to Public Health Professionals Using Active-Learning Strategies

Abstract

Keywords

References