Preference for Fasciocutaneous Flap Over Musculocutaneous Flap as a First-Line Option for Ischial Pressure Wound Reconstruction: A Review of 64 Cases

Abstract

The ischial pressure wound usually comprises a large, extensive defect and involves the repair of more than a small opening. Most surgeons have used a musculocutaneous flap to fill the large dead space of an ischial pressure wound. However, sacrificing muscle tissue has a potential risk of postoperative bleeding. The transferred muscle ultimately loses function as a cushion to absorb pressure. Conservation of muscle structures may be beneficial for use in future recurrence, which is common with ischial pressure wound. We compared the difference in outcome between musculocutaneous and fasciocutaneous flaps and analyzed factors affecting complications with the flaps in ischial pressure wound reconstruction. This study reviewed the results of 64 flaps in 44 patients with ischial wounds. The wounds were reconstructed with 34 musculocutaneous flaps (53%) and 30 fasciocutaneous flaps (47%). Twenty-three cases (36%) had complete healing, and 41 (64%) had complications. There was no significant difference in outcomes between fasciocutaneous and musculocutaneous flap groups. Crude logistic regression analysis showed no significant risk factors for occurrence of major complications. When fasciocutaneous flaps were used, the neighboring perforators and muscle tissues could be conserved. With a perforator-based fasciocutaneous flap, a de-epithelized distal portion of the flap could be used to fill the dead space. Therefore, the fasciocutaneous flap may have priority over the musculocutaneous flap as a first-line option for ischial pressure wound reconstruction.