The value of using quantitative measures to follow the progress of wound healing is well recognized. However, several methods are in use, and the best way to do this is not always clear from the literature. This article describes the advantages of the linear healing parameter and the disadvantages of the area- and volume-based parameters. The shapes and sizes of wounds influence area- and volume-based parameters, hence these will give biased comparisons. Healing rates based on the linear parameter are independent of initial wound size or shape, and they allow unbiased comparisons within and across studies. A formula for predicting healing time from measurements early in the healing course is presented and discussed. Less precise linear healing measurements that are easy to obtain, and that are as valid as the more precise measurements, are also described.
1. Gilman T. Letter to the editor. Wounds2003;15:A14-A16.
2.
2. Gilman T. (Comments on) A multicenter study of percentage change in venous leg ulcer area as a prognostic index of healing at 24 weeks. Br J Dermatol2003;149:896-898.
3.
3. Griffin JW, Tolley EA, Tooms RE, Reyes RA, Clifft JK. A comparison of photographic and transparency-based methods for measuring wound surface area. Phys Ther1993;73:117-122.
4.
4. Gowland Hopkins NF, Jamieson CW. Antibiotic concentration in the exudate of venous ulcers: the prediction of ulcer healing rate. Br J Surg1983;70:532-534.
5.
5. Gilman T. Parameter for measurement of wound closure. Wounds1990;2:95-101.
6.
6. Margolis DJ, Gross EA, Wood CR, Lazarus GS. Planimetric rate of healing in venous ulcers of the leg treated with pressure bandage and hydrocolloid dressing. J Am Acad Dermatol1993;28:418-421.
7.
7. Gorin DR, Cordts PR, LaMorte WW, Manzoian JO. The influence of wound geometry on the measurement of wound healing rates in clinical trials. J Vasc Surg1996;23:524-528.
8.
8. Pecoraro RE, Ahroni JH, Boyko EJ, Stensel VL. Chronology and determinants of tissue repair in diabetic lower-extremity ulcers. Diabetes1991;40:1305-1313.
9.
9. Whitney JD, Salvadalena G, Higa L, Mich M. Treatment of pressure ulcers with noncontact normothermic wound therapy: healing and warming effects. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs2001;28:244-252.
11. Snowden JM. Wound closure: an analysis of the relative contributions of contraction and epithelialization. J Surg Res1984;37:453-463.
12.
12. Cordts PR, Hanrahan LM, Rodriguez AA, Woodson J, LaMorte WW, Menzoian JO. A prospective, randomized trial of Unna’s boot versus Duoderm CGF hydroactive dressing plus compression in the management of venous leg ulcers. J Vasc Surg1992;15:480-486.
13.
13. van Rijswijk L, Polansky M. Predictors of time to healing deep pressure ulcers. Ostomy Wound Manage1994;40:40-48.
14.
14. Kantor J, Margolis DJ. A multicentre study of percentage change in venous leg ulcer area as a prognostic index of healing at 24 weeks. Br J Dermatol2000;142:960-964.
15.
15. Sheehan P, Jones P, Caselli A, Giurini JM, Veves A. Percent change in wound area of diabetic foot ulcers over a 4-week period is a robust predictor of complete healing in a 12-week prospective trial. Diabetes Care2003;26:1879-1882.
16.
16. Smith RB, Rogers B, Tolstykh GP, et al.Three-dimensional laser imaging system for measuring wound geometry. Lasers Surg Med1998;23:87.
17.
17. Plassmann P, Melhuish JM, Harding KG. Methods of measuring wound size: a comparative study. Ostomy Wound Manage1994;40:50-60.
18.
18. Bulstrode CJ, Goode AW, Scott PJ. Stereophotogrammetry for measuring rates of cutaneous healing: a comparison with conventional techniques. Clin Sci (Lond)1986;71:437-443.
19.
19. Kundin JI. Anew way to sizeupawound. Am J Nurs1989;89:206-207.
20.
20 Bulstrode CJ, Goode AW, Scott PJ. Measurement and prediction of progress in delayed wound healing. J R Soc Med1987;80:210-212.
21.
21. Margolis DJ. Wound healing assessment: the clinical utility of wound healing rates. Ostomy Wound Manage1994;40:20-27.
22.
22. Gilman TH. Comparing healing rates across studies is the vision, but first, a correct equation please!Ostomy Wound Manage1995;41:6-7.
23.
23. Sabolinski M, Falanga V, Giovino K, Toole T. Mean healing rates at four weeks can predict complete wound closure of diabetic foot ulcers. J Infect Dis2001;117:544.
24.
24. Donohue K, Falanga V. Healing rate as a prognostic indicator of complete healing: a reappraisal. Wounds2003;15:71-76.
