Universal screening is a promising and proactive method to detect emotional and behavioral risk in schools. To date, most of the research on screening has evaluated teacher report formats. Despite the potential benefits, there has been a general lack of research on student self-report particularly in elementary grade levels. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relative predictive ability of teacher and student report of risk on later academic outcomes. Results indicated that student self-report of risk significantly contributed to the prediction of academic outcomes even when controlling for demographic variables and in comparison to teacher report. The strength of this relationship increased from first to fifth grade. Implications and future research are discussed.
ChristT. J.AranasY.JohnsonL.KemberJ.KilgusS.KissA.McCarthy TrentmanA.MonaghenB.NelsonG.NelsonP.NewellK.Van NormanE.WhiteM.WindramH. (2014). Formative Assessment System for Teachers Technical Manual. Minneapolis, MN: FastBridge Learning.
3.
De Los ReyesA.AugensteinT. M.WangM.ThomasS. A.DrabickD. A. G.BurgersD.RabinowitzJ. (2015). The validity of the multi-informant approach to assessing child and adolescent mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 858–900.
4.
DeverB. V.DowdyE.DiStefanoC. (2018). Examining the stability, accuracy, and predictive validity of behavioral–emotional screening scores across time to inform repeated screening procedures. School Psychology Review, 47, 360–371.
5.
DomitrovichC. E.BradshawC. P.GreenbergM. T.EmbryD.PoduskaJ. M.IalongoN. S. (2010). Integrated models of school-based prevention: Logic and theory. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 71–88.
6.
DowdyE.DeverB. V.RainesT. C.MoffaK. (2016). A preliminary investigation into the added value of multiple gates and informants in universal screening for behavioral and emotional risk. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 32, 178–198.
7.
DowdyE.KimE. (2012). Choosing informants when conducting a universal screening for behavioral and emotional risk. School Psychology Forum, 6, 1–10.
8.
EklundK.KilgusS. P.von der EmbseN.BeardmoreM.TannerN. (2017). Use of universal screening scores to predict distal academic and behavioral outcomes: A multilevel approach. Psychological Assessment, 29, 486–499. doi:10.1037/pas0000355
9.
KettlerR. J.ElliottS. N.DiPernaJ. C.BoltD. M.ReiserD.ResurreccionL. (2014). Student and teacher ratings of academic competence: An examination of cross-informant agreement. Journal of Applied School Psychology30, 4, 338-354. doi: 10.1080/15377903.2014.950442
10.
KilgusS. P.BowmanN. A.ChristT. J.TaylorC. N. (2017). Predicting academics via behavior within an elementary sample: An evaluation of the Social, Academic, and Emotional Behavior Risk Screener (SAEBRS). Psychology in the Schools, 54, 246–260.
11.
KilgusS. P.EklundK.von der EmbseN. P.TaylorC.SimsW. A. (2016). Psychometric defensibility of the Social, Academic, and Emotional Behavior Risk Screener (SAEBRS) teacher rating scale and multiple gating procedure within elementary and middle school samples. Journal of School Psychology, 58, 21–39. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2016.07.001
12.
KilgusS. P.von der EmbseN. P. (2014). Unpublished technical manual of the social, academic, and emotional behavior risk screener.
13.
LairdR. D.De Los ReyesA. (2013). Testing informant discrepancies as predictors of early adolescent psychopathology: Why difference scores cannot tell you what you want to know and how polynomial regression may. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41, 1–14.
14.
LaneK. L.OakesW. P.EnnisR. P.HirschS. E. (2014). Identifying students for secondary and tertiary prevention efforts: How do we determine which students have Tier 2 and Tier 3 needs?Preventing School Failure, 58, 171–182. doi:10.1080/1045988X.2014.895573
15.
MerikangasK. R.HeJ.BursteinM.SwansonS. A.AvenevoliS.CuiL.BenjetC.GeorgiadesK.SwendsenJ. (2010). Lifetime prevalence of mental disorders in U.S. adolescents: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication–Adolescent Supplement (NCS-A). Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 49(10), 980-989. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2010.05.017
16.
MillerF. G.CohenD.ChafouleasS. M.Riley-TillmanT. C.WelshM. E.FabianoG. A. (2015). A comparison of measures to screen for social, emotional, and behavioral risk. School Psychology Quarterly, 30, 184–196. doi:10.1037/spq0000085
17.
National Center on Intensive Intervention. (2019). Behavioral Screening Tools Chart. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, National Center on Intensive Intervention. Retrieved from: https://charts.intensiveintervention.org/chart/behavior-screening
18.
ReidE. K.Keller-MargulisM. A.SchandingG. T.Jr.TolarT. D. (2019). Predicting kindergarten writing achievement using early written expression and behavior screening. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 35, 215–233. doi:10.1080/15377903.2019.1568333
19.
SeversonH. H.WalkerH. M.Hope-DoolittleJ.KratochwillT. R.GreshamF. M. (2007). Proactive, early screening to detect behaviorally at-risk students: Issues, approaches, emerging innovations, and professional practices. Journal of School Psychology, 45, 193-223. doi:10.1016/j.jps.2006.11.003
20.
SuldoS. M.GormleyM. J.DuPaulG. J.Anderson-ButcherD. (2014). The impact of school mental health on student and school-level academic outcomes: Current status of the research and future directions. School Mental Health, 6,84–98.
21.
Van den NoortgateW.OpdenakkerM. C.OnghenaP. (2005). The effects of ignoring a level in multilevel analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 16, 281–303.
22.
von der EmbseN. P.PendergastL.KilgusS. P.EklundK. (2016). Evaluating the applied use of a mental health screener: Structural validity of the Social, Academic, and Emotional Behavior Risk Screener (SAEBRS). Psychological Assessment, 28 (10), 1265-1275. doi: 10.1037/pas0000253
23.
von der EmbseN. P.IaccarinoS.MankinA.KilgusS.MagenE. (2017). Development and validation of the Social, Academic, and Emotional Behavior Risk Screener–Student Rating Scale. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 42, 186–192. doi:10.1177/1534508416679410
24.
von der EmbseN. P.KilgusS. P.AkeE.EklundK. R.Levi-NielsenS. (2018). Training teachers to facilitate early identification of mental and behavioral health risk. School Psychology Review, 47, 372–384.
25.
von der EmbseN. P.KilgusS. P.IaccarinoS.Levi-NielsenS. (2017). Screening for student mental health risk: Diagnostic accuracy, measurement invariance, and predictive validity of the Social, Academic, and Emotional Behavior Risk Screener-Student Rating Scale (SAEBRS-SRS). School Mental Health, 9, 273–283. doi:10.1007/s12310-017-9214-7
26.
von der EmbseN. P.KimE.KilgusS. P.DedrickR.*SanchezA. (2019). Multi-informant universal screening: Evaluation of rater, item, and construct variance with a trifactor model. Journal of School Psychology.
27.
WhitleyS. F.Cuenca-CarlinoY. (2019). Examining the Technical Adequacy of the Social, Academic, and Emotional Behavior Risk Screener. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 1534508419857225.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
