Evidence for the Technical Adequacy of the Teacher Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) Beliefs Scale

Abstract

Implementation of social and emotional learning (SEL) programs and practices is becoming increasingly prevalent in Pre-K through Grade 12 educational settings. Research provides robust evidence to support positive outcomes associated with SEL implementation; however, we also know that implementation can be impacted by a variety of different individual and organizational factors. Teacher beliefs can influence how teachers implement SEL programming and represent an important area of study. The purpose of this study was to explore evidence for the technical adequacy of the Teacher SEL Beliefs Scale by examining the internal structure, internal consistency, and relations between subscale scores and teacher self-reported implementation fidelity of the Second Step SEL program. Confirmatory factor analysis of 103 teachers’ responses indicated that the three-factor solution found by prior authors, consisting of Comfort, Commitment, and Culture subscales, was also supported in the current sample. Moreover, ordinal logistic regression analyses suggested that the Comfort factor was significantly associated with how consistently teachers reported implementing the Second Step program. Implications for practice and future research are discussed.

Keywords

social emotional learning assessment consultation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ajzen

(1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Center on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing.

Bandura

(1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.

Brackett

M. A.

Reyes

M. R.

Rivers

S. E.

Elbertson

N. A.

Salovey

(2012). Assessing teachers’ beliefs about social and emotional learning. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30(3), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282911424879

Clayback

K. A.

Williford

A. P.

Vitiello

V. E.

(2022). Identifying teacher beliefs and experiences associated with curriculum implementation fidelity in early childhood education. Prevention Science, 24, 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-022-01414-z

Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning. (n.d.). Fundamentals of SEL. https://casel.org/fundamentals-of-sel/

Committee for Children. (2011). Second step program. https://www.secondstep.org/

Cook

C. R.

Lyon

A. R.

Kubergovic

Browning Wright

Zhang

(2015). A supportive beliefs intervention to facilitate the implementation of evidence-based practices within a multi-tiered system of supports. School Mental Health, 7, 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-014-9139-3

Corcoran

R. P.

Cheung

A. C.

Kim

Xie

(2018). Effective universal school-based social and emotional learning programs for improving academic achievement: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 50 years of research. Educational Research Review, 25, 56–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.12.001

10.

Domitrovich

C. E.

Mathis

E. T.

Greenberg

M. T.

(2019). Individual and organizational factors associated with teacher self-reported implementation of the PATHS curriculum. Journal of School Psychology, 76, 168–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2019.07.015

11.

Durlak

J. A.

DuPre

E. P.

(2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 327–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0

12.

Durlak

J. A.

Weissberg

R. P.

Dymnicki

A. B.

Taylor

R. D.

Schellinger

K. B.

(2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x

13.

Fox

R. A.

Sharma

Leif

E. S.

(2021). The factors that count: Predicting implementation fidelity of evidence-based behavioural supports in Australian schools. International Journal of Inclusive Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2021.1979669

14.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 61(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

15.

Messick

(1989). Meaning and values in test validation: The science and ethics of assessment. Educational Researcher, 18(2), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018002005

16.

Minnesota Department of Education. (2022). Minnesota report card. https://rc.education.mn.gov/

17.

Nelson

T. D.

Steele

R. G.

(2007). Predictors of practitioner self-reported use of evidence-based practices: Practitioner training, clinical setting, and attitudes toward research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 34, 319–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-006-0111-x

18.

Owens

J. S.

Lyon

A. R.

Brandt

N. E.

Warner

C. M.

Nadeem

Speil

Wagner

(2014). Implementation science in school mental health: Key constructs in a developing research agenda. School Mental Health, 6, 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-013-9115-3

19.

Stanford

(2022, June 13). As terms like SEL draw fire, organizations supporting schools sharpen their message. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/leadership/as-terms-like-sel-draw-fire-organizations-supporting-schools-sharpen-their-message/2022/06

20.

Taylor

R. D.

Oberle

Durlak

J. A.

Weissberg

R. P.

(2017). Promoting positive youth development through school-based social and emotional learning interventions: A meta-analysis of follow-up effects. Child Development, 88, 1156–1171. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12864

21.

Thierry

K. L.

Vincent

R. L.

Norris

(2022). Teacher-level predictors of the fidelity of implementation of a social-emotional learning curriculum. Early Education and Development, 33(1), 92–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2020.184989