The Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM) is a frequently used measure of mindfulness in school settings. This study evaluates the psychometric properties and internal consistency of the CAMM in a predominantly African American, low socioeconomic status (SES) school sample drawn from students in kindergarten through fourth grade. In addition, a revised version of the CAMM (the CAMM-R) was developed and evaluated in the same sample. Results are generally supportive of the internal consistency and item-level characteristics of both the CAMM and the CAMM-R. These results are discussed in terms of implications for understanding the reliability and validity of the CAMM and CAMM-R among underrepresented students, as well as students within a younger sample.
AikensN. L.BarbarinO. (2008). Socioeconomic differences in reading trajectories: The contribution of family, neighborhood, and school contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 235–251. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.235
BishopS. R.LauM.ShapiroS.CarlsonL.AndersonN. D.CarmodyJ.VeltingD. (2004). Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11, 230–241. doi:10.1093/clipsy.bph077
4.
BurkeC. A. (2010). Mindfulness-based approaches with children and adolescents: A preliminary review of current research in an emergent field. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 19, 133–144. doi:10.1007/s10826-009-9282-x
5.
CarlsonK. D.HerdmanA. O. (2012). Understanding the impact of convergent validity on research results. Organizational Research Methods, 151, 17–32. doi:10.1177/1094428110392383
6.
DeVellisR. F. (2012). Scale development: Theory and applications (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
GoodmanM. S.MadniL. A.SempleR. J. (2017). Measuring mindfulness in youth: Review of current assessments, challenges, and future directions. Mindfulness, 8, 1409–1420. doi:10.1007/s12671-017-0719-9
8.
GrecoL. A.BaerR. A.SmithG. T. (2011). Assessing mindfulness in children and adolescents: Development and validation of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM). Psychological Assessment, 23, 606–614. doi:10.1037/a0022819
9.
HayesS. C.LuomaJ. B.BondF. W.MasudaA.LillisJ. (2006). Acceptance and commitment therapy: Model, processes and outcomes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44, 1–25. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2005.06.006
10.
HoxJ. J.BorgersN.SikkelD. (2003). Response quality in survey research with children and adolescents: The effect of labeled response options and vague quantifiers. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 15, 83–94. doi:10.1093/ijpor/15.1.83
11.
KincaidJ. P.FishburneR. P.Jr.RogersR. L.ChissomB. S. (1975). Derivation of new readability formulas (automated readability index, Fog count and Flesch reading ease formula) for Navy enlisted personnel. Pensacola, FL: Navy Training Command Research Branch. doi:10.21236/ADA006655
12.
KlingbeilD. A.RenshawT. L.WillenbrinkJ. B.CopekR. A.ChanK. T.HaddockA.CliftonJ. (2017). Mindfulness-based interventions with youth: A comprehensive meta-analysis of group-design studies. Journal of School Psychology, 63, 77–103. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2017.03.006
13.
KubyA. K.McLeanN.AllenK. (2015). Validation of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM) with non-clinical adolescents. Mindfulness, 6, 1448–1455. doi:10.1007/s12671-015-0418-3
14.
McGrathP. A.SeifertC. E.SpeechleyK. N.BoothJ. C.StittL.GibsonM. C. (1996). A new analogue scale for assessing children’s pain: An initial validation study. Pain, 64(3), 435–443. doi:10.1016/0304-3959(95)00171-9
15.
MeiklejohnJ.PhillipsC.FreedmanM. L.GriffinM. L.BiegelG.RoachA.IsbergR. (2012). Integrating mindfulness training into K-12 education: Fostering the resilience of teachers and students. Mindfulness, 3, 291–307. doi:10.1007/s12671-012-0094-5
16.
MendelsonT.GreenbergM. T.DariotisJ. K.GouldL. F.RhoadesB. L.LeafP. J. (2010). Feasibility and preliminary outcomes of a school-based mindfulness intervention for urban youth. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38, 985–994. doi:10.1007/s10802-010-9418-x
17.
MorganP. L.FarkasG.HillemeierM. M.MaczugaS. (2009). Risk factors for learning-related behavior problems at 24 months of age: Population-based estimates. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37, 401–413. doi:10.1007/s10802-008-9279-8
18.
PallozziR.WertheimE.PaxtonS.OngB. (2017). Trait mindfulness measures for use with adolescents: A systematic review. Mindfulness, 8, 110–125. doi:10.1007/s12671-016-0567-z
19.
PedhazurE. J.SchmelkinL. P. (1991). Measurement, designed, and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20.
RenshawT. L. (2017). Preliminary development and validation of the mindful student questionnaire. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 42, 168–175. doi:10.1177/1534508416678971
21.
RenshawT. L.O’MalleyM. D. (2014). Cultivating mindfulness in students. In FurlongM. J.GilmanR.HuebnerE. S. (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology in the schools (pp. 245–259). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Van DamN. T.van VugtM. K.VagoD. R.SchmalzlL.SaronC. D.OlendzkiA.. . . MeyerD. E. (2018). Mind the hype: A critical evaluation and prescriptive agenda for research on mindfulness and meditation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13, 36–61. doi:10.1177/1745691617709589
24.
ZoogmanS.GoldbergS. B.HoytW. T.MillerL. (2015). Mindfulness interventions with youth: A meta-analysis. Mindfulness, 6, 290–302. doi:10.1007/s12671-013-0260-4
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
