The purpose of this investigation was to develop and initially validate the Intervention Selection Profile–Social Skills (ISP-SS), a novel brief social skills assessment method intended for use at Tier 2. Participants included 54 elementary school teachers and their 243 randomly selected students. Teachers rated students on two rating scales, including the Social and Academic Behavior Risk Screener (SABRS) and the Social Skills Improvement System (SSIS). Items corresponding to the SABRS Social Behavior scale were considered for inclusion in the ISP-SS, given the research supporting the scale’s reliability, validity, and diagnostic accuracy as a predictor of social skill performance. A clinimetric approach was used in selecting SABRS items for the ISP-SS based upon applied utility, which was defined as the accuracy with which items predicted the presence of social skill acquisition deficits within broad skill domains. Findings supported the selection of six items, which yielded acceptable levels of agreement and classification accuracy. ISP-SS items evidenced adequate internal consistency, with alpha coefficients falling within acceptable ranges. Taken together, findings yielded initial support for the use of the ISP-SS in identifying acquisition deficits to be targeted via Tier 2 social skills instruction. Implications for practice and future directions for research are presented.
BarrerasR. B. (2009). An experimental analysis of the treatment validity of the social skills deficit model for at-risk adolescents (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Riverside.
2.
CarranD. T.ScottK. G. (1992). Risk assessment in preschool children: Research implications for the early detection of educational handicaps. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 12, 196–211.
3.
CohenJ. (1968). Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 213–220.
4.
Committee for Children. (2011). Second step: A violence prevention curriculum. Seattle, WA: Author.
5.
CookC. R.GreshamF. M.KernL.BarrerasR. B.ThorntonS.CrewsS. D. (2008). Social skills training for secondary students with emotional and/or behavioral disorders. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 16, 131–144.
6.
CortinaJ. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal or Applied Psychology, 78, 98–104.
7.
de VetH. C. W.TerweeC. B.BouterL. M. (2003). Current challenges in clinimetrics. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 56, 1137–1141.
8.
ElliottS. N.GreshamF. M. (2008). Social Skills Improvement System Intervention Guide manual. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessments.
9.
FeinsteinA. R. (1987). Clinimetrics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
10.
GoldsteinA. P.McGinnisE. (1997). Skillstreaming the adolescent: New strategies and perspectives for teaching prosocial skills. Champaign, IL: Research Press.
11.
GreshamF. M. (1981). Social skills training with handicapped children: A review. Review of Educational Research, 51, 139–176.
12.
GreshamF. M. (1986). Conceptual and definitional issues in the assessment of children’s social skills: Implications for classification and training. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 15, 3–15.
13.
GreshamF. M.CookC. R.CollinsT.DartE.RasetshwaneK.TruelsonE.GrantS. (2010). Developing change-sensitive brief behavior rating scale as a progress monitoring tool for social behavior: An example using the Social Skills Rating System—Teacher Form. School Psychology Review, 39, 364–379.
14.
GreshamF. M.CookC. R.DrewsS. D.KernL. (2004). Social skills training for children and youth with emotional and behavioral disorders: Validity considerations and future directions. Behavioral Disorders, 30, 32–46.
15.
GreshamF. M.ElliottS. N. (1984). Assessment and classification of children’s social skills: A review of methods and issues. School Psychology Review, 13, 292–301.
16.
GreshamF. M.ElliottS. N. (2008). Social skills improvement system: Rating scales. Bloomington, MN: Pearson.
17.
GreshamF. M.ElliottS. N.KettlerR. J. (2011). Base rates of social skill acquisition/performance deficits, strengths, and problem behaviors: An analysis of the Social Skills Improvement System—Rating scales. Psychological Assessment, 22, 809–815.
18.
GreshamF. M.ElliottS. N.VanceM. J.CookC. R. (2011). Comparability of the Social Skills Rating System to the Social Skills Improvement System: Content and psychometric comparisons across elementary and secondary age levels. School Psychology Quarterly, 26, 27–44.
19.
GreshamF. M.VanM.CookC. R. (2006). Social skills training for teaching replacement behaviors: Remediation of acquisition deficits for at-risk children. Behavioral Disorders, 32, 32–46.
20.
HawkenL. S.AdolphsonS. L.MacLeodK. S.SchumannJ. M. (2009). Secondary tier interventions and supports. In SugaiG.HornerR. H.DunlapG.SailorW. (Eds.), Handbook of positive behavior support (pp. 395–420). New York, NY: Springer.
21.
HintzeJ. M.SilberglittB. (2005). A longitudinal examination of the diagnostic accuracy and predictive validity of R-CBM and high-stakes testing. School Psychology Review, 34, 372–386.
22.
JenkinsJ. R.HudsonR. F.JohnsonE. S. (2007). Screening for at-risk readers in a response to intervention framework. School Psychology Review, 36, 582–600.
23.
JohnsonE. S.JenkinsJ. R.PetscherY.CattsH. W. (2009). How can we improve the accuracy of screening instruments?Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 24, 174–185.
24.
KilgusS. P.ChafouleasS. M.Riley-TillmanT. C. (2013). Development and initial validation of the Social and Academic Behavior Risk Screener for elementary grades. School Psychology Quarterly, 28, 210–226.
25.
KwonK.KimE. M.SheridanS. M. (2012). A contextual approach to social skills assessment in the peer group: Who is the best judge?School Psychology Quarterly, 27, 121–133.
26.
LaneK. L.WehbyJ.MenziesH. M.DoukasG. L.MuntonS. M.GreggR. M. (2003). Social skills instruction for students at risk for antisocial behavior: The effects of small-group instruction. Behavioral Disorders, 28, 229–248.
27.
MerrellK. W. (2001). Assessment of children’s social skills: Recent developments, best practices, and new directions. Exceptionality, 9, 3–18.
28.
MillerP. A.EisenbergN. (1988). The relation of empathy to aggressive and externalizing/antisocial behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 324–344.
29.
NewcomerL. L.FreemanR.BarrettS. (2013). Essential systems for sustainable implementation of tier 2 supports. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 29, 126–147.
30.
QuinnM. M.KavaleK. A.MathurS. R.RutherfordR. B.FornessS. R. (1999). A meta-analysis of social skills intervention for students with emotional or behavioral disorders. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 7, 54–64.
31.
ReinkeW. M.StormontM.ClareA.LatimoreT.HermanK. C. (2013). Differentiating tier 2 social behavioral interventions according to function of behavior. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 29, 148–166.
32.
SanettiL. M. H.SimonsenB. (2011). Positive behavioral supports. In BrayM.KehleT. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of school psychology (pp. 647–665). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
33.
StreinerD. L. (2003). Clinimetrics vs. psychometrics: An unnecessary distinction. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 56, 1142–1145.
34.
TombaE.BechP. (2012). Clinimetrics and clinical psychometrics: Macro- and micro-analysis. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 81, 333–343.
35.
VanDerHeydenA. M.WittJ. C.GilbertsonD. (2007). A multi-year evaluation of the effects of a Response to Intervention (RTI) model on identification of children for special education. Journal of School Psychology, 45, 225–256.
36.
VannestK. J. (2012). Implementing interventions and progress monitoring subsequent to universal screening. School Psychology Forum, 6, 119–136.
37.
VolpeR. J.FabianoG. A. (2013). Daily behavior report cards: An evidence-based system of assessment and intervention. New York, NY: Guilford.
38.
WalkerH. M.McConnellS. (1995). Walker-McConnell Scale of Social Competence and School Adjustment, Adolescent Version. San Diego, CA: Singular.
39.
WhitcombS. A.MerrellK. W. (2013). Behavioral, social, and emotional assessment of children and adolescents (4th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
