The creation of psychometrically sound assessments of teacher well-being is critical given the alarmingly high rates of teacher burnout reported among U.S. educators. The present study sought to address this need by developing the Measures of Stressors and Supports for Teachers (MOST), a teacher-report questionnaire designed to assess ecological and psychological factors that affect teachers’ professional well-being. To assess structural validity, the MOST was administered to a sample of K–12 educators (N = 218). Methods outlined in Classical Test Theory and exploratory factor analysis were conducted to examine items and assess the factor structure of the MOST. Factor analytic findings yielded a 40-item, nine-factor structure (Parents, Colleagues, School Leadership and Belonging, Classroom Students, Students With Disabilities, Time Pressure, Professional Development, Safety, and Emotional State). Implications for further validation and use of the MOST are discussed.
AllisonP. D. (2009). Missing data. In MillsapR. E.Maydeu-OlivaresA. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of quantitative methods in psychology (pp. 72–89). SAGE.
2.
BakkerA. B.DemeroutiE.EuwemaM. C. (2005). Job resources buffer the impact of job demands on burnout. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10, 170–180.
3.
BaltarF.BrunetI. (2012). Social research 2.0: Virtual snowball sampling method using Facebook. Internet Research, 22, 57–74.
4.
BergJ. K.CornellD. (2016). Authoritative school climate, aggression toward teachers, and teacher distress in middle school. School Psychology Quarterly, 31, 122–139.
5.
BevansK.BradshawC.MiechR.LeafP. (2007). Staff-and school-level predictors of school organizational health: A multilevel analysis. Journal of School Health, 77, 294–302.
6.
BoydD.GrossmanP.IngM.LankfordH.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2011). The influence of school administrators on teacher retention decisions. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 303–333.
7.
BrykA. S.SebringP. B.AllensworthE.EastonJ. Q.LuppescuS. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. University of Chicago Press.
8.
Carver-ThomasD.Darling-HammondL. (2017). Teacher turnover: Why it matters and what we can do about it. Learning Policy Institute.
9.
CollieR. J.ShapkaJ. D.PerryN. E. (2012). School climate and social-emotional learning: Predicting teacher stress, job satisfaction, and teaching efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 1189–1204.
10.
CollieR. J.ShapkaJ. D.PerryN. E.MartinA. J. (2015). Teacher well-being: Exploring its components and a practice-oriented scale. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33, 744–756.
11.
CornellD. G.MayerM. J. (2010). Why do school order and safety matter?Educational Researcher, 39, 7–15.
12.
CostelloA. B.OsborneJ. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Exploratory Factor Analysis, 10, 1–9.
13.
Darling-HammondL.WeiR. C.AndreeA. (2010). How high-achieving countries develop great teachers. Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education.
14.
DeVellisR. F. (2006). Classical test theory. Medical Care, 44, 50–59.
15.
DilibertiM. K.SchwartzH. L.GrantD. (2021). Stress topped the reasons why public school teachers quit, even before COVID-19. RAND Corporation.
16.
FieldA. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. Sage Publications.
17.
FimianM. J.FastenauP. S. (1990). The validity and reliability of the Teacher Stress Inventory: A re-analysis of aggregate data. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11(2), 151–157.
18.
Gallup. (2014). State of American schools: The path to winning again in education. Gallup Poll.
19.
GarcíaE.WeissE. (2019). The teacher shortage is real, large and growing, and worse than we thought. Economic Policy Institute.
20.
GoddardR.GoddardY.Sook KimE.MillerR. (2015). A theoretical and empirical analysis of the roles of instructional leadership, teacher collaboration, and collective efficacy beliefs in support of student learning. American Journal of Education, 121, 501–530.
GorsuchR. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23.
GraysonJ. L.AlvarezH. K. (2008). School climate factors relating to teacher burnout: A mediator model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1349–1363.
24.
GreenbergM. T.BrownJ. L.AbenavoliR. M. (2016). Teacher stress and health effects on teachers, students, and schools. Edna Bennett Pierce Prevention Research Center, Pennsylvania State University.
25.
HatcherL. (1994). A step-by-step approach to using the SAS® system for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. SAS Institute.
26.
HayesA. F.CouttsJ. J. (2020). Use omega rather than Cronbach’s alpha for estimating reliability. But . . . Communication Methods and Measures, 14, 1–24.
27.
HaytonJ. C.AllenD. G.ScarpelloV. (2004). Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 191–205.
28.
HeY. (2010). Missing data analysis using multiple imputation: Getting to the heart of the matter. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 3, 98–105.
29.
HermanK. C.Hickmon-RosaJ. E.ReinkeW. M. (2018). Empirically derived profiles of teacher stress, burnout, self-efficacy, and coping and associated student outcomes. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 20, 90–100.
30.
HopkinsD.ReynoldsD. (2001). The past, present and future of school improvement: Towards the third age. British Educational Research Journal, 27, 459–475.
31.
HoyW. K.SmithP. A.SweetlandS. R. (2002). The development of the organizational climate index for high schools: Its measure and relationship to faculty trust. The High School Journal, 86, 38–49.
32.
JenningsP. A.GreenbergM. T. (2009). The prosocial classroom: Teacher social and emotional competence in relation to student and classroom outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 79, 491–525.
33.
JeonL.BuettnerC. K.SnyderA. R. (2014). Pathways from teacher depression and child-care quality to child behavioral problems. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 82, 225–235.
34.
JohnsonS. M.KraftM. A.PapayJ. P. (2012). How context matters in high-need schools: The effects of teachers’ working conditions on their professional satisfaction and their students’ achievement. Teachers College Record, 114, 1–39.
35.
KaneM. (2013). The argument-based approach to validation. School Psychology Review, 42, 448–457.
36.
KesslerR. C.AndrewsG.ColpeL. J.HiripiE.MroczekD. K.NormandS. L.WaltersE. E.ZaslavskyA. M. (2002). Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychological Medicine, 32, 959–976.
37.
KraftM. A.MarinellW. H.Shen-Wei YeeD. (2016). School organizational contexts, teacher turnover, and student achievement: Evidence from panel data. American Educational Research Journal, 53, 1411–1449.
38.
KyriazosT. A. (2018). Applied psychometrics: Sample size and sample power considerations in factor analysis (EFA, CFA) and SEM in general. Psychology, 9, 2207–2230.
39.
LaddH. (2010). Teachers’ perceptions of their working conditions: How predictive of policy-relevant outcomes? (Research Working Paper No. 33). National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education.
40.
LeithwoodK.HarrisA.HopkinsD. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership and Management, 28, 27–42.
41.
LoebS.Darling-HammondL.LuczakJ. (2005). How teaching conditions predict teacher turnover in California schools. Peabody Journal of Education, 80, 44–70.
ManasiaL.PârvanA.MacoveiM. (2020). Towards a model of teacher well-being from a positive emotions perspective. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 10, 469–496.
McLeanL.ConnorC. M. (2015). Depressive symptoms in third-grade teachers: Relations to classroom quality and student achievement. Child Development, 86, 945–954.
46.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2008). Schools and staffing survey (SASS).
NunnallyJ. C.BernsteinI. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw Hill.
49.
OberleE.Schonert-ReichlK. A. (2016). Stress contagion in the classroom? The link between classroom teacher burnout and morning cortisol in elementary school students. Social Science & Medicine, 159, 30–37.
50.
OsborneJ. W.CostelloA. B. (2004). Sample size and subject to item ratio in principal components analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 9, 1–9.
51.
PasE. T.BradshawC. P.HershfeldtP. A. (2012). Teacher- and school-level predictors of teacher efficacy and burnout: Identifying potential areas for support. Journal of School Psychology, 50, 129–145.
52.
RadloffL. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.
53.
RenshawT. L.LongA. C. J.CookC. R. (2015). Assessing teachers’ positive psychological functioning at work: Development and validation of the Teacher Subjective Wellbeing Questionnaire. School Psychology Quarterly, 30, 289–306.
RolstadS.AdlerJ.RydénA. (2011). Response burden and questionnaire length: Is shorter better? A review and meta-analysis. Value in Health, 14, 1101–1108.
56.
RonfeldtM.FarmerS. O.McQueenK.GrissomJ. A. (2015). Teacher collaboration in instructional teams and student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 52, 475–514.
57.
SandilosL. E.GobleP.Rimm-KaufmanS. E.PiantaR. C. (2018). Does professional development reduce the influence of teacher stress on teacher–child interactions in pre-kindergarten classrooms?Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 42, 280–290.
58.
SchwarzerR.HallumS. (2008). Perceived teacher self-efficacy as a predictor of job stress and burnout: Mediation analyses. Applied Psychology, 57, 152–171.
59.
ShiD.LeeT.FairchildA. J.Maydeu-OlivaresA. (2020). Fitting ordinal factor analysis models with missing data: A comparison between pairwise deletion and multiple imputation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 80, 41–66.
60.
SkaalvikE. M.SkaalvikS. (2011). Teacher job satisfaction and motivation to leave the teaching profession: Relations with school context, feeling of belonging, and emotional exhaustion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 1029–1038.
61.
SpiltJ. L.KoomenH. M.ThijsJ. T. (2011). Teacher wellbeing: The importance of teacher–student relationships. Educational Psychology Review, 23, 457–477.
62.
SupovitzJ.SirinidesP.MayH. (2010). How principals and peers influence teaching and learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46, 31–56.
63.
SwanlundA. (2011). Identifying working conditions that enhance teacher effectiveness: The psychometric evaluation of the Teacher Working Conditions Survey. American Institutes for Research.
64.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2001). SAS for windows workbook for Tabachnick and Fidell using multivariate statistics. Allyn and Bacon.
65.
Trizano-HermosillaI.AlvaradoJ. M. (2016). Best alternatives to Cronbach’s alpha reliability in realistic conditions. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 769–778.
66.
Tschannen-MoranM. (2009). Fostering teacher professionalism in schools: The role of leadership orientation and trust. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45, 217–247.
67.
van HornJ. E.TarisT. W.SchaufeliW. B.SchreursP. J. (2004). The structure of occupational well-being: A study among Dutch teachers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 365–375.
68.
VelicerW. F.JacksonD. N. (1990). Component analysis versus common factor analysis: Some issues in selecting an appropriate procedure. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 1–28.
69.
WatersS.CrossD.ShawT. (2010). Does the nature of schools matter? An exploration of selected school ecology factors on adolescent perceptions of school connectedness. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 381–402.
70.
WeingartenR.JohnsonL.RickerM. C. (2017). Educator quality of work life survey. American Federation of Teachers.
71.
YoonJ. (2002). Teacher characteristics as predictors of teacher-student relationships: Stress, negative affect, and self-efficacy. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 30, 485–493.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
