Approaching a body of literature from a historical perspective is widely acknowledged as essential to conducting a literature review. Methodological guidance for approaching a body of literature from a historical perspective depends on familiarity with works historians have written about the practice of historical research. This article provides some direction by drawing from the best-known work of one distinguished historian, a work which, upon careful reading, outlines some fundamental tasks for the historically-inclined reviewer of a body of literature. An evaluation rubric is presented that facilitates a progressive appraisal of the integration of history within a literature review. Ultimately, the article serves to stimulate the processes of thought, interpretation and rationalization when historically engaging with a body of literature. Numerous examples from the literature on human resource development are identified that illustrate the issues discussed in the article.
AbbottA. (2004). Methods of discovery: Heuristics for the social sciences. W. W. Norton.
2.
AlagarajaM.DooleyL. M. (2003). Origins and historical influences on human resource development: A global perspective. Human Resource Development Review, 2(1), 82–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484303251170
3.
AsimovI. (1963). The genetic code. New American Library.
4.
BergerD. (1946). War time and post war Pennsylvania contracts, decisions and statutes. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 95(1), 30–58. https://doi.org/10.2307/3309521
5.
BlochM. (1953). The historian’s craft (PutnamP., Trans.). Random House. (Originally published in 1949 as Apologie pour l'histoire ou Métier d'historien, Cahier des Annales, 3, Librairie Armand Colin)
6.
BooteD. N.BeileP. (2005). Scholars before researchers: On the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation. Educational Researcher, 34(6), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X034006003
7.
BowkerG. C.StarS. L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. MIT Press.
8.
BraudelF. (1958). Histoire et sciences sociales : La longue durée. Annales. Économies, Sociétés, Civilisations, 4, 725–753 (In English, collected in F. Braudel (1980). On History. S. Matthews (Trans.). University of Chicago Press (this collection first published in 1969 as Écrits sur l’histoire, Flammarion). The translation is from the English collection, p. 38).
9.
BraudelF. (1980). On history (MatthewsS., Trans.). University of Chicago Press. (First published in 1969 as Écrits sur l’histoire, Flammarion)
10.
BreisachE. (2007). Historiography: Ancient, medieval, and modern (3rd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
11.
BrewerE. W.ShapardL. (2004). Employee burnout: A meta-analysis of the relationship between age or years of experience. Human Resource Development Review, 3(2), 102–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484304263335
12.
BurckhardtJ. (1979). Reflections on history (HottingerM. D., Trans.). Liberty Fund. (First published in 1905 as Weltgeschichtliche Betrachtungen, Verlag von W Spemann)
13.
BurckhardtJ. (2007). Judgements on history and historians (ZohnH., Trans.). Routledge. (First published in 1929 as Historische Fragmente by Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt)
14.
BurguièreA. (2009). The annales school: An intellectual history (ToddJ. M., Trans.). Cornell University Press. (Originally published as L’École des Annales: Une histoire intellectuelle, Editions Odile Jacob)
15.
BurkeP. (2015). The French historical revolution: The annales school, 1929–2014 (Revised and updated 2nd ed.). Stanford University Press.
16.
BurrellG.MorganG. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis: Elements of the sociology of corporate life. Heinemann.
17.
ButterfieldH. (1965). The whig interpretation of history. W. W. Norton.
18.
CallahanJ. L. (2007). Gazing into the crystal ball: Critical HRD as a future of research in the field. Human Resource Development International, 10(1), 77–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678860601170344
19.
CallahanJ. L. (2010). Reconstructing, constructing, and deconstructing the field: The importance of historical manuscripts. Human Resource Development Review, 9(4), 311–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484310379956
ChecklandP. (1999). Systems thinking, systems practice: Includes a 30-year retrospective. Wiley.
23.
CollingwoodR. G. (1939). An autobiography. Clarendon Press.
24.
CollingwoodR. G. (1994). The idea of history (Rev. ed.). Oxford University Press.
25.
CollingwoodR. G. (1999a). The principles of history and other writings in philosophy of history (DrayW. H.van der DussenW. J., Eds). Oxford University Press.
26.
CollingwoodR. G. (1999b). Inaugural rough notes. In DrayW. H.van der DussenW. J. (Eds.), The principles of history and other writings in philosophy of history (pp. 143–169). Oxford University Press.
27.
CollinsJ. C. (2012). Identity matters: A critical exploration of lesbian, gay, and bisexual identity and leadership in HRD. Human Resource Development Review, 11(3), 349–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484312446810
28.
CooperH. M. (1988). Organizing knowledge syntheses: A taxonomy of literature reviews. Knowledge, Technology & Policy, 1(1), 104–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03177550
29.
CroceB. (1921). History: Its theory and practice (AinslieD., Trans.). Harcourt, Brace and Co. (Originally published in 1917 as Teoria e storia della storiografia, Gius, Laterza & Figli)
30.
D’AbateC. P.EddyE. R.TannenbaumS. I. (2003). What’s in a name? A literature-based approach to understanding mentoring, coaching, and other constructs that describe developmental interactions. Human Resource Development Review, 2(4), 360–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484303255033
EltonG. R. (2002). The practice of history (2nd ed.). Blackwell. (Originally published in 1967)
34.
EvansR. J. (1998). In defense of history. W. W. Norton.
35.
FebvreL. (1973). A new kind of history: From the writings of Febvre (BurkeP., Ed., FolcaK., Trans.). Routledge & Kegan Paul.
36.
FeuerringM. (1953). An imaginary interview with French artists. Meanjin, 12(3), 279–291.
37.
FischerD. H. (1970). Historians’ Fallacies: Toward a logic of historical thought. HarperCollins.
38.
FoucaultM. (1978). The history of sexuality. Pantheon Books.
39.
GaddisJ. L. (2002). The landscape of history: How historians map the past. Oxford University Press.
40.
GarfieldE. (1979). Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities. Wiley.
41.
GegenfurtnerA.VeermansK.FestnerD.GruberH. (2009). Motivation to transfer training: An integrative literature review. Human Resource Development Review, 8(3), 403–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484309335970
42.
GeorgiouI. (2007). Thinking through systems thinking. Routledge.
43.
GeorgiouI. (2014). Seeing the forest for the trees: An atlas of the politics-administration dichotomy. Public Administration Review, 74(2), 156–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12163
44.
GeorgiouI.ConcerR.MrvarA. (2020). A systemic approach to sociometric group research: Advancing the work of Leslie Day Zeleny, 1939–1947. Social Networks, 63, 174–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2020.01.002
45.
GeorgiouI.HeckJ.MrvarA. (2019). The analysis of interconnected decision areas: A computational approach to finding all feasible solutions. Group Decision and Negotiation, 28(3), 543–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-018-9607-5
46.
GithensR. P. (2015). Critical action research in human resource development. Human Resource Development Review, 14(2), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484315581934
47.
GrantM. J.BoothA. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
48.
GreenR.BowserM. (2006). Observations from the field: Sharing a literature review rubric. Journal of Library Administration, 45(1–2), 185–202. https://doi.org/10.1300/J111v45n01_10
49.
GreenbergS. A. (2009). How citation distortions create unfounded authority: Analysis of a citation network. British Medical Journal, 339(7714), 210–213. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2680
50.
HartC. (1998). Doing a literature review: Releasing the social science research imagination. Sage.
51.
HighamJ. (1989). History: Professional scholarship in America. Johns Hopkins University Press. (Originally published in 1965)
52.
HughesH. S. (1964). History as art and as science: Twin vistas on the past. Harper and Row.
JacksonM. C. (2003). Systems thinking: Creative holism for managers. Wiley.
55.
JenkinsK. (1991). Re-thinking history. Routledge.
56.
JohnsonS. (1755). A dictionary of the English language (Vol. I). J. & P. Knapton, T. & T. Longman, C. Hitch & L. Hawes, A. Millar, and R. & J. Dodsley.
57.
JonesE. G. (2006). The impossible interview with the man of the neuron doctrine. Journal of the History of the Neurosciences, 15(4), 326–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647040600649319
LangloisC.-V.SeignobosC. (1898). Introduction to the study of history (BerryG. G., Trans.). Duckworth. (Originally published in 1898 as Introduction aux études historiques, Librairie Hachette)
60.
Le GoffJ. (1992). History and memory (RendallS.ClamanE., Trans.). Columbia University Press.
61.
MillerN. (1984). Editorial: Reader, writer, and editor: An imaginary interview. The Antioch Review, 42(2), 131–134. https://doi.org/10.2307/4611335
62.
NovickP. (1988). That noble dream: The “objectivity question” and the American historical profession. Cambridge University Press.
OvereemP. (2012). The politics-administration dichotomy: Toward a constitutional perspective. Taylor & Francis.
65.
RandolphJ. J. (2009). A guide to writing the dissertation literature review. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.7275/b0az-8t74
66.
RankeL. (1824). Geschichten der romanischen und germanischen Völker von 1494 bis 1535. ReimerBey G. (From the Preface, available in English in F. Stern’s (1973) The Varieties of History: From Voltaire to the Present, published by Random House, pp. 55–58, fragment from page 57)
RoccoT. S.PlakhotnikM. S. (2009). Literature reviews, conceptual frameworks, and theoretical frameworks: Terms, functions, and distinctions. Human Resource Development Review, 8(1), 120–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484309332617
SheaW. R. (2013). Galileo interviewed. Zurich Press.
74.
ShuckB.WollardK. (2010). Employee engagement and HRD: A seminal review of the foundations. Human Resource Development Review, 9(1), 89–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484309353560
SwansonR. A. (2007). Theory framework for applied disciplines: Boundaries, contributing, core, useful, novel, and irrelevant components. Human Resource Development Review, 6(3), 321–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484307303770
81.
ThompsonE. P. (1963). The making of the English working class. Vintage.
82.
TorracoR. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283
83.
TrehanK.RiggC. (2011). Theorising critical HRD: A paradox of intricacy and discrepancy. Journal of European Industrial Training, 35(3), 276–290. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090591111120421
84.
WheelockL. D.CallahanJ. L. (2006). Mary Parker Follett: A rediscovered voice informing the field of human resource development. Human Resource Development Review, 5(2), 258–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484306287258
85.
WhiteH. (1987). The content of the form. Johns Hopkins University Press.
86.
WhiteH. (2010). The fiction of narrative: Essays on history, literature, and theory 1957–2007. Johns Hopkins University Press.
87.
WhiteH. (2014). Metahistory: The historical imagination in nineteenth-century Europe (40th anniversary ed.). Johns Hopkins University Press. (First published in 1973)
88.
WildmanJ. L.ThayerA. L.RosenM. A.SalasE.MathieuJ. E.RayneS. R. (2012). Task types and team-level attributes: Synthesis of team classification literature. Human Resource Development Review, 11(1), 97–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484311417561
89.
WinstonW. L.AlbrightS. C. (2019). Practical management science (6th ed.). Cengage.
