This essay—based on fieldwork with off-grid homebuilders in the Mid-Ohio River Valley—recognizes ethnography as a more-than-human ecology of habit, rhythm, and affect. I begin by describing some of the materials, species, and affects I encountered during this fieldwork to show how Appalachian history, geography, and habit influenced my performance of sensory ethnography. From these anecdotes, field notes, and vignettes, I theorize ethnographic fieldwork as, first and foremost, a rhythmic attunement to place and bodies, especially nonhuman ones. In turn, I argue for a practice of fieldwork that roots human experience within a vibrant material ecology of more-than-human forces.
KirbyJ. T. (1983). The Southern exodus, 1910-1960: A primer for historians. The Journal of Southern History, 49, 585-600. doi:10.2307/2208677
7.
LichterD. T.GarrattJ.MarshallM. L.CardellaM. (2005). Emerging patterns of population redistribution and migration in Appalachia. Washington, DC: Appalachian Regional Commission: Population Reference Bureau. Retrieved from http://purl.access.gpo.gov/GPO/LPS99949
8.
MadisonS.HameraJ. (2005). Performance studies at the intersections. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (Vol. 4, pp. xi-xxv). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
9.
MassumiB. (2009). The future birth of the affective fact: The political ontology of threat. In GreggM.SeigworthG. (Eds.), The Affect Theory Reader (pp. 52-70). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
10.
PinkS. (2010). The future of sensory anthropology/the anthropology of the senses. Social Anthropology/Anthropologie Sociale, 18, 331-340. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8676.2010.00119.x
