BennettJ.KagaY.MossP. (2010). Caring and learning together: A cross-national study of integration of early childhood care and education within education. Paris, France: UNESCO.
2.
BritzmanD. (2003). Practice makes practice: a critical study of learning to teach. Albany: State University of New York Press.
CannellaG. S.KincheloeJ. (Eds.). (2002). Kidworld: Childhood studies, globalization, and education. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
6.
CannellaG. S.ViruruR. (2004). Childhood and (post)colonization: Power, education, and contemporary practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
7.
CliffordJ. (1981). On ethnographic surrealism. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 23, 539-564.
8.
CliffordJ.MarcusG. (1990). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
9.
ColombatA. (1996). Deleuze’s death as an event. Man and World, 29, 235-249.
10.
ConquergoodD. (1992). Ethnography, rhetoric and performance. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 78, 80-97.
11.
DalkeA.GrobsteinP.McCormackE. (2006). Exploring interdisciplinarity: The significance of metaphoric and metonymic exchange. Journal of Research Practice, 2(2), Article M3. Retrieved from http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/43/54
12.
Dall’AstaM. (2004). Thinking about cinema: First waves. In TempleM.WittM. (Eds.), The French cinema book (pp. 82-89). London, UK: British Film Institute.
13.
DeleuzeG. (1993). The fold. Leibniz and the Baroque. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
14.
DukicV. (2009). The two-fold structure of the death-event. Journal of Philosophy, 10(3), 1-10.
15.
FleerM., (2010). Early learning and development: Cultural-historical concepts in play. Port Melbourne, Australia: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Floyd-ThomasS. M.GillmanL.AllenK. R. (2002). Interdisciplinarity as self and subject: Metaphor and transformation. Issues in Integrative Studies, 20, 1-26.
17.
FrisbyD. (2002) Georg Simmel: Key sociologists. London, UK: Routledge.
18.
GroszE. (2009). “The Thing.” In CandlinF.GuinsR. (Eds.), The object reader (pp. 124-138). London, UK: Routledge.
19.
KehilyM. J. (Ed). (2004). An introduction to childhood studies. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
20.
KleinJ. T. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, & practice. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
21.
MacLureMHolmesRMacRaeC.JonesL. (2010). Animating classroom ethnography: Overcoming video-fear. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23, 543-556.
22.
MassumiB. (1992). A user’s guide to capitalism and schizophrenia: Deviations from Deleuze and Guattari. London, UK: MIT Press.
23.
NewellW. H. (Ed.). (1998). Interdisciplinarity: Essays from the literature. New York, NY: College Entrance Examination Board.
24.
PignatelliF. (1998). Critical ethnography/poststructuralist concerns: Foucault and the play of memory. Interchange, 294, 403-423.
25.
ProustM. (1932). Remembrance of things past, translated from the French by C. K. Scott Moncrieff; Volume: 5 (The Captive), Chapter: II, (The Verdurins Quarrel with M. de Charlus).
26.
ProutA. (2004). The future of childhood. London, UK: Routledge.
27.
SymondsJ. E.GorardS. (2010). Death of mixed methods? Or the rebirth of research as a craft. Evaluation and Research in Education, 23(2), 121-136.
28.
WalkerdineV. (Ed). (2002). Challenging subjects: Critical psychology for a new millennium. London, UK: Palgrave.
29.
WalkerdineV. (2007). Children, gender, video games: Towards a relational approach to multi-media. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
30.
WilliamsL. (1981). Figures of desire: A theory and analysis of surrealist film. Berkeley: University of California.