U.S. presidential campaigns generate an extraordinary volume of political news intended to inform and mobilize the electorate. Yet long-standing concerns about citizens’ limited capacity to process political information raise the possibility that this abundance may instead produce disengagement as a coping mechanism for election stress. This study examines whether perceptions of election news overload during the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign are linked to intentional avoidance of election-related news. Drawing on an original six-item measure of perceived election news overload, the analysis reveals substantial heterogeneity in how citizens experienced the campaign news environment, with a majority reporting at least some degree of overload. Importantly, higher levels of perceived election news overload are associated with a greater likelihood of intentionally avoiding election coverage. This relationship persists after accounting for well-established predictors of political information engagement, including political interest, efficacy, knowledge, partisan strength, and demographics. Moving beyond reliance on self-reports alone, the study combines survey measures with a news story selection task to capture both behavioral and stated avoidance. The findings suggest that information abundance during campaigns may undermine citizen competence by encouraging strategic disengagement from election news.
BaumM. A. (2002). Sex, lies, and war: How soft news brings foreign policy to the inattentive public. American Political Science Review, 96(1), 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055402004252
2.
BawdenD.RobinsonL. (2009). The dark side of information: Overload, anxiety, and other paradoxes and pathologies. Journal of Information Science, 35(2), 180–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551508095781
3.
BerinskyA. J.HuberG. A.LenzG. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s mechanical turk. Political Analysis, 20(3), 351–368. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpr057
4.
CampbellA.ConverseP. E.MillerW. E.StokesD. E. (1960). The American voter. John Wiley & Sons.
5.
CaseD. O. (2012). Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs and behavior (3rd ed.). Emerald Group Publishing.
6.
CoppockA. (2019). Generalizing from survey experiments conducted on mechanical Turk: A replication approach. Political Science Research and Methods, 7(3), 613–628. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2018.10
7.
CoppockA.LeeperT. J.MullinixK. J. (2018). Generalizability of heterogeneous treatment effect estimates across samples. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(49), 12441–12446. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1808083115
8.
de BruinK.de HaanY.VliegenthartR.KruikemeierS.BoukesM. (2021). News avoidance during the COVID-19 crisis: Understanding information overload. Digital Journalism, 9(9), 1286–1302. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1957967
9.
EdmundsA.MorrisA. (2000). The problem of information overload in business organisations: A review of the literature. International Journal of Information Management, 20(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0268-4012(99)00051-1
10.
EpplerM. J.MengisJ. (2004). The concept of information overload: A review of literature from organization science, accounting, marketing, MIS and related disciplines. The Information Society, 20(5), 325–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240490507974
11.
FarhoomandA. F.DruryD. H. (2002). Managerial information overload. Communications of the ACM, 45(10), 127–131. https://doi.org/10.1145/570907.570909.
12.
FraserT.PanagopoulosC.SmithK. (2023). Election-related post-traumatic stress: Evidence from the 2020 US presidential election. Politics and the Life Sciences, 42(2), 179–204. https://doi.org/10.1017/pls.2023.8
13.
GimpelJ.KaufmannK.Pearson-MerkowitzS. (2007). Battleground states versus blackout states: The behavioral implications of modern presidential campaigns. The Journal of Politics, 69(3), 786–797. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00575.x
GoyanesM.Ardèvol-AbreuA.Gil de ZúñigaH. (2023). Antecedents of news avoidance: Competing effects of political interest, news overload, trust in news media, and “news finds me” perception. Digital Journalism, 11(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1990097
17.
Groot KormelinkT.Klein GunnewiekA. (2022). From “far away” to “shock” to “fatigue” to “back to normal”: How young people experienced news during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journalism Studies, 23(5-6), 669–686. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2021.1932560
18.
GurrG.MetagJ. (2022). Fatigued by ongoing news issues? How repeated exposure to the same news issue affects the audience. Mass Communication & Society, 25(4), 578–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2021.1956543
19.
HaraK.AdamsA.MillandK.SavageS.Callison-BurchC.BighamJ. P. (2018). A data-driven analysis of workers’ earnings on amazon mechanical turk. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Paper449, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174023
20.
HempP. (2009). Death by information overload. Harvard Business Review, 87(9), 82–89.
21.
HoltonA. E.ChyiH. I. (2012). News and the overloaded consumer: Factors influencing information overload among news consumers. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(11), 619–624. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0610
22.
JacobyJ. (1984). Perspectives on information overload. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(4), 432–435. https://doi.org/10.1086/208981
23.
JacobyJ.SpellerD. E.BerningC. K. (1974). Brand choice behavior as a function of information load: Replication and extension. Journal of Consumer Research, 1(1), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1086/208579
KlingbergT. (2008). The overflowing brain: Information overload and the limits of working memory. Oxford University Press.
26.
KuklinskiJ. H.HurleyN. L. (1994). On hearing and interpreting political messages: A cautionary tale of citizen cue-taking. The Journal of Politics, 56(3), 729–751. https://doi.org/10.2307/2132190
27.
LauR. R.RedlawskD. P. (2006). How voters decide: Information processing in election campaigns. Cambridge University Press.
28.
LeeS. K.KimK. S.KohJ. (2016). Antecedents of news consumers’ perceived information overload and news consumption pattern in the USA. International Journal of Contents, 12(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5392/ijoc.2016.12.3.001
29.
LewisD. (1996). Dying for information? Reuters business information.
30.
LippmannW. (1922). Public opinion. Macmillan.
31.
McNairB. (2000). Journalism and democracy: An evaluation of the political public sphere. Psychology Press.
32.
MetagJ.GurrG. (2023). Too much information? A longitudinal analysis of information overload and avoidance of referendum information prior to voting day. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 100(3), 646–667. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990221127380
33.
MindichD. T. (2005). Tuned out: Why Americans under 40 don’t follow the news. Oxford University Press.
34.
MisraS.StokolsD. (2012). Psychological and health outcomes of perceived information overload. Environment and Behavior, 44(6), 737–759. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916511404408
35.
MulderI.de PootH.VerwijC.JanssenR.BijlsmaM. (2006). An information overload study: Using design methods for understanding. In In proceedings of the 18th Australia conference on computer-human interaction: Design: Activities, artefacts and environments (pp. 245–252). ACM.
36.
MullinixK. J.LeeperT. J.DruckmanJ. N.FreeseJ. (2015). The generalizability of survey experiments. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 2(2), 109–138. https://doi.org/10.1017/xps.2015.19
37.
NeelyS.SmithK.HavirdS.CornM. (2026). The anxious state: Stress, polarization, and elections in America. Wiley.
38.
ParkC. S. (2019). Does too much news on social media discourage news seeking? Mediating role of news efficacy between perceived news overload and news avoidance on social media. Social Media + Society, 5(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119872956
39.
RedlawskD. P.CivettiniA. J.EmmersonK. M. (2010). The affective tipping point: Do motivated reasoners ever “get it”. Political Psychology, 31(4), 563–595. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00772.x
40.
SchäferS.AalderingL.LechelerS. (2023). “Give me a break!” prevalence and predictors of intentional news avoidance during the COVID-19 pandemic. Mass Communication & Society, 26(4), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2022.2125406
41.
SchäferS.BetakovaD.LechelerS. (2024). Zooming in on Topics: An investigation of the prevalence and motives for selective news avoidance. Journalism Studies, 25(12), 1423–1440.
42.
SmithK.WeinschenkA.PanagopoulosC. (2024). On pins and needles: Anxiety, politics and the 2020 US presidential election. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion, and Parties, 34(3), 409–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2023.2189258
43.
SongH.JungJ.KimY. (2017). Perceived news overload and its cognitive and attitudinal consequences for news usage in South Korea. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94(4), 1172–1190. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016679975
44.
ToffB.KalogeropoulosA. (2020). All the news that’s fit to ignore: How the information environment does and does not shape news avoidance. Public Opinion Quarterly, 84(S1), 366–390. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfaa016
45.
TunneyC.ThorsonE.ChenW. (2021). Following and avoiding fear-inducing news topics: Fear intensity, perceived news topic importance, self-efficacy, and news overload. Journalism Studies, 22(5), 614–632. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2021.1890636
46.
TushmanM. L.NadlerD. A. (1979). Information processing as an integrating concept in organizational design. Academy of Management Review, 3(3), 613–624. https://doi.org/10.2307/257550
47.
van ErkelP.Van AelstP. (2021). Why don’t we learn from social media? Studying effects of and mechanisms behind social media news use on general surveillance political knowledge. Political Communication, 38(4), 407–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1784328
48.
WeickK. E. (1970). The twigging of overload. In PepinskyH. B. (Ed.), People and information. Pergamon.
49.
WilliamsonJ.EakerC. P. E.LounsburyJ. (2012). The information overload scale. Asist2012, 49(1), 1-3.
ZallerJ. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
