Domestic travel has become a common practice for modern presidents. Many claim local media cover these presidential trips more extensively and positively than the national media, yet no one has examined the validity of this assumption. We begin this examination with a study of local and national newspaper coverage of President George W. Bush’s 2001 domestic travel. Our findings confirm that the local press covers presidential domestic trips both more comprehensively and favorably than the national press. We also analyze variations in local newspaper coverage of presidential visits, finding that the most important factor influencing both the amount and tone of such coverage is the level of presidential support within a community. Other factors discovered to affect either the amount or tone of local coverage include the availability of adversarial sources, whether a newspaper has a Democratic editorial bent, and whether a visit occurred after the 9/11 terrorist attacks.
Aday, S., & Devitt, J. (2001). Style over substance: Newspaper coverage of Elizabeth Dole’s presidential bid. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 6, 52-73.
2.
Barrett, A. W. (2004). Gone public: The impact of going public on presidential legislative success. American Politics Review, 31, 1-33.
3.
Barrett, A. W. (2005). Going public as a legislative weapon: Measuring presidential appeals regarding specific legislation. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 35, 1-10.
4.
Barrett, A. W., & Barrington, L. W. (2006). Bias in newspaper photograph selection. Political Research Quarterly, 58, 609-618.
5.
Bennett, W. L. (1990). Toward a theory of press-state relations in the United States. Journal of Communication, 40, 103-127.
6.
Bennett, W. L. (2005). News: The politics of illusion (6th ed.). New York: Longman.
7.
Blumenthal, S. (1980). The permanent campaign: Inside the world of elite political operatives. Boston: Beacon.
8.
Bogart, L. (1989). Press and public: Who reads what, when, where, and why in American newspapers (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
Boorstin, D. (1961). The image: A guide to pseudo-events in America. New York: Atheneum.
10.
Brace, P., & Hinckley, B. (1992). Follow the leader: Opinion polls and the modern presidents. New York: HarperCollins.
11.
Canes-Wrone, B. (2001). The president’s legislative influence from public appeals. American Journal of Political Science, 45, 313-329.
12.
Canes-Wrone, B., & de Marchi, S. (2002). Presidential approval and legislative success. Journal of Politics, 64, 491-509.
13.
Cohen, J. E. (1997). Presidential responsiveness and public policy-making. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
14.
Cohen, J. E. (2004). If the news is so bad, why are presidential polls so high? Presidents, the news media, and the mass public in an era of new media. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 34, 493-515.
15.
Cohen, J. E., & Powell, R. J. (2005). Building presidential support from the grassroots up: The impact of presidential travel on state-level approval. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 35, 11-27.
16.
Cook, C. (2002). The permanence of the “permanent campaign”: George W. Bush’s public presidency. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 32, 753-764.
17.
Danielson, W. A., & Adams, J. B. (1961). Completeness of press coverage of the 1960 campaign. Journalism Quarterly, 38, 441-452.
18.
Durham, B. M., Cohen, J. E., Fleisher, R., & Bond, J. R. (2003, April). The effects of state level presidential approval on support in the Senate. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
19.
Edwards, G. C., III. (2003). On deaf ears: The limits of the bully pulpit. New Haven, CT: Yale.
20.
Edwards, G. C., III. (2007). Governing by campaigning: The politics of the Bush presidency. New York: Pearson, Longman.
21.
Edwards, G. C., III, & Wood, B. D. (1999). Who influences whom? The president, Congress, and the media. American Political Science Review, 93, 327-344.
22.
Eshbaugh-Soha, M. (2003). Presidential press conferences over time. American Journal of Political Science, 47, 348-353.
23.
Eshbaugh-Soha, M., & Peake, J. S. (2005). Presidents and the economic agenda. Political Research Quarterly, 58, 127-138.
24.
Eshbaugh-Soha, M., & Peake, J. S. (in press). New strategies in presidential policy appeals: “Going local” to reform social security. Presidential Studies Quarterly.
25.
Farnsworth, S. J., & Lichter, S. R. (2004). Increasing candidate-centered televised discourse: Evaluating local news coverage of campaign 2000. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 9, 76-93.
26.
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2001). SPSS for windows: Step by step (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
27.
Graber, D. A. (2002). Mass media and American politics (6th ed.). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
28.
Hager, G. L., & Sullivan, T. (1994). President-centered and presidency-centered explanations of presidential public activity. American Journal of Political Science, 38, 1078-1103.
29.
Hart, R. P. (1987). The sound of leadership: Presidential communication in the modern age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30.
Just, M., Crigler, A., & Buhr, T. (1999). Voice, substance, and cynicism in presidential campaign media. Political Communication, 16, 25-44.
31.
Just, M. R., Crigler, A. N., Alger, D. E., Cook, T. E., Kern, M., & West, D. M. (1996). Crosstalk: Citizens, candidates, and the media in a presidential campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32.
Kahn, K. F., & Kenney, P. J. (2002). The slant of the news: How editorial endorsements influence campaign coverage and citizens’ views of candidates. American Political Science Review, 96, 381-394.
33.
Kaniss, P. (1991). Making local news. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
34.
Keen, J. (2001, March 12). Bush on record pace for travel time. USA Today, p. 1A-1A.
35.
Kernell, S. (1997). Going public: New strategies of presidential leadership (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
36.
King, G. (1993). The methodology of presidential research. In G. C. Edwards, III, J. K. Kessel, & B. A. Rockman (Eds.), Researching the presidency: Vital questions, new approaches (pp. 387-412). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
37.
Kiolbassa, J. (1997). Is local TV news still local? Coverage of presidential and senate races in Los Angeles. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 2, 79-95.
38.
Laracey, M. C. (2002). Presidents and the people: The partisan story of going public. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
39.
Livingston, S., & Bennett, W. L. (2003). Gatekeeping, indexing, and live event news: Is technology altering the construction of news? Political Communication, 20, 363-380.
40.
Ostrom, C. W., & Simon, D. M. (1985). Promise and performance: A dynamic model of presidential popularity. American Political Science Review, 79, 334-358.
41.
Page, B. I. (1996). Who deliberates? Mass media in modern democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42.
Patterson, T. E. (1980). The mass media election: How Americans choose their president. New York: Praeger.
43.
Patterson, T. E. (1993). Out of order. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
44.
Peake, J. S. (2001). Presidential agenda setting in foreign policy. Political Research Quarterly, 54, 69-86.
45.
Powell, R. J. (1999). “Going public” revisited: Presidential speechmaking and the bargaining setting in Congress. Congress & the Presidency, 26, 153-170.
46.
Ragsdale, L. (1984). The politics of presidential speechmaking, 1949-1980. American Political Science Review, 79, 971-984.
47.
Ragsdale, L. (1998). Vital statistics on the presidency: Washington to Clinton. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
48.
Roberts, R. N., & Eksterowicz, A. J. (1996). Local news, presidential campaigns, and citizenship education: A reform proposal. PS: Political Science and Politics, 29, 66-72.
49.
Rowse, A. E. (1957). Slanted news: A case study of the Nixon and Stevenson fund stories. Boston: Beacon.
50.
Shaw, D. R., & Sparrow, B. H. (1999). From the inner ring out: News congruence, cue-taking, and campaign coverage. Political Research Quarterly, 52, 323-351.
51.
Stempel, G. H., III. (1961). The prestige press covers the 1960 presidential campaign. Journalism Quarterly, 38, 157-163.
52.
Tenpas, K. D. (2000). The American presidency: Surviving and thriving amidst the permanent campaign. In N. J. Ornstein & T. E. Mann (Eds.), The permanent campaign and its future (pp. 108-133). Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute and Brookings Institution.
53.
Wasserman, D. P. (1999). The local contours of campaign coverage. Communication Research, 26, 701-725.
54.
Wood, B. D., & Peake, J. S. (1998). The dynamics of foreign policy agenda setting. American Political Science Review, 92, 173-184.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
