Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Recent surveys suggest that Americans’ trust in institutions has decreased, including trust in science and government. Such trends could have significant effects on the health of democracy, scientific advancement, information consumption, and more. However, trust can stem from different considerations. In some cases, a lack of trust arises from ill will or suspicion over integrity, that is, concerns about immorality or wrong doing. It can also arise from pessimism about competence. These different causes elicit distinct reactions, which could motivate varied reactions toward groups that are not trusted. Using multiple original surveys of US adults (total N = 3,894), including an original experiment, we find that seeing scientists and politicians as morally bad - but not as incompetent - leads to lower trust in these individuals. This suggests that perceptions of moral wrongdoing are stronger drivers of lower political and scientific trust in recent years, compared to perceived incompetence. These results hold in correlational analysis, although the effects vary somewhat by partisanship. Together, these results have important implications for understanding the driver of major ills that threaten the functioning of society and government.

Keywords

trust morality competence anti-intellectualism political trust science

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Achen

C. H.

Bartels

L. M.

(2017). Democracy for realists: Why elections do not produce responsive government. Princeton University Press.

Achterberg

De Koster

Van der Waal

(2017). A science confidence gap: Education, trust in scientific methods, and trust in scientific institutions in the United States, 2014. Public Understanding of Science, 26(6), 704–720. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515617367

Albertson

Gadarian

S. K.

(2015). Anxious politics: Democratic citizenship in a threatening world. Cambridge University Press.

Avery

J. M.

(2007). Race, partisanship, and political trust following bush versus gore (2000). Political Behavior, 29(3), 327–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-006-9021-6

Baier

(1986). Trust and antitrust. Ethics, 96(2), 231–260. https://doi.org/10.1086/292745

Banks

A. J.

(2014). Anger and racial politics: The emotional foundation of racial attitudes in America. Cambridge University Press.

Barker

D. C.

Detamble

Marietta

(2022). Intellectualism, anti-intellectualism, and epistemic hubris in red and blue America. American Political Science Review, 116(1), 38–53. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055421000988

Bernard

(2018). Climate change deniers are increasingly angry and hostile. The Medium. https://medium.com/the–future–is–electric/climate–change–deniers–are–increasingly–angry–and–hostile–52b32b0e6896

Besley

J. C.

Tiffany

L. A.

(2023). What are you assessing when you measure “trust” in scientists with a direct measure? Public Understanding of Science, 32(6), 709–726. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625231161302

10.

Bowler

Karp

J. A.

(2004). Politicians, scandals, and trust in government. Political Behavior, 26(3), 271–287. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:pobe.0000043456.87303.3a

11.

Brinkmann

(2018). The concept of political competence. Critical Review, 30(3-4), 163–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2018.1572974

12.

Carlin

R. E.

Love

G. J.

Martínez-Gallardo

(2015). Cushioning the fall: Scandals, economic conditions, and executive approval. Political Behavior, 37(1), 109–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-014-9267-3

13.

Chanley

V. A.

Rudolph

T. J.

Rahn

W. M.

(2000). The origins and consequences of public trust in government: A time series analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64(3), 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1086/317987

14.

Citrin

Stoker

(2018). Political trust in a cynical age. Annual Review of Political Science, 21(1), 49–70. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050316-092550

15.

Clifford

Jerit

(2018). Disgust, anxiety, and political learning in the face of threat. American Journal of Political Science, 62(2), 266–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12350

16.

Cohen

(2025). Report shows trump administration has carried out more than 400 attacks on science in six months. Union of Concerned Scientists. https://www.ucs.org/about/news/report–shows–trump–administration–has–carried–out–more–400–attacks–science–six–months

17.

Coleman

(1990). Foundations of social theory. Harvard University Press.

18.

Cologna

Mede

N. G.

Berger

Besley

Brick

Joubert

Maibach

E. W.

Mihelj

Oreskes

Schäfer

M. S.

van der Linden

Abdul Aziz

N. I.

Abdulsalam

Shamsi

N. A.

Aczel

Adinugroho

Alabrese

Aldoh

Alfano

Zwaan

R. A.

, et al. (2025). Trust in scientists and their role in society across 68 countries. Nature Human Behaviour, 9(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02090-5

19.

Cramer

K. J.

(2016). The politics of resentment: Rural consciousness in Wisconsin and the rise of Scott Walker. University of Chicago Press.

20.

Crawford

S. E.

Ostrom

(1995). A grammar of institutions. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 582–600. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082975

21.

D’Cruz

(2020). Trust and distrust. In The routledge handbook of trust and philosophy. Routledge.

22.

Devine

Valgarðsson

Jennings

Stoker

Bunting

(2024). The causes of perceived government trustworthiness. European Journal of Political Research, 64(4), 1394–1412. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12742

23.

Druckman

J. N.

(2022). Threats to science: Politicization, misinformation, and inequalities. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 700(1), 8–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027162221095431

24.

Druckman

J. N.

Ognyanova

Safarpour

Schulman

Lunz Trujillo

Uslu

A. A.

Green

Baum

M. A.

Quintana-Mathé

Perlis

R. H.

Lazer

D. M. J.

(2025). Representation in science and trust in scientists in the USA. Nature Human Behaviour, 10(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-025-02358-4

25.

Dyck

Pearson-Merkowitz

Coates

(2018). Primary distrust: Political distrust and support for the insurgent candidacies of Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders in the 2016 primary. PS: Political Science & Politics, 51(2), 351–357. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096517002505

26.

Enders

A. M.

Thornton

J. R.

(2022). Racial resentment, electoral loss, and satisfaction with democracy among whites in the United States: 2004–2016. Political Behavior, 44(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-021-09708-8

27.

Evans

(2024). The public distrusts scientists’ morals, not their science. Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the–public–distrusts–scientists–morals–not–their–science

28.

Fiske

S. T.

Dupree

(2014). Gaining trust as well as respect in communicating to motivated audiences about science topics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(supplement_4), 13593–13597. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1317505111

29.

Fiske

S. T.

Durante

(2014). Never trust a politician? Collective distrust, relational accountability, and voter response. In: Power, politics, and paranoia: Why people are suspicious of their leaders (pp. 91–105). Cambridge University Press.

30.

Fox

Shotts

K. W.

(2009). Delegates or trustees? A theory of political accountability. The Journal of Politics, 71(4), 1225–1237. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381609990260

31.

Furnas

A. C.

Fishman

Rosenstiel

Wang

(2025). Partisan disparities in the funding of science in the United States. Science, 389(6766), 1195–1200. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adx5154

32.

Grovier

(1992). Distrust as a practical problem. Journal of Social Philosophy, 23(1), 52–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9833.1992.tb00484.x

33.

Hardin

(2002). Trust & Trustworthiness. Russell Sage Foundation.

34.

Hetherington

M. J.

(1998). The political relevance of political trust. American Political Science Review, 92(4), 791–808. https://doi.org/10.2307/2586304

35.

Hetherington

M. J.

(2005). Why trust matters: Declining political trust and the demise of American liberalism. Princeton University Press.

36.

Hochschild

A. R.

(2018). Strangers in their own land: Anger and mourning on the American right. The New Press.

37.

Huber

Barnidge

Gil de Zúñiga

Liu

(2019). Fostering public trust in science: The role of social media. Public Understanding of Science, 28(7), 759–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519869097

38.

Inglehart

(1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton University Press.

39.

Jones

(2025). U.S. trust in government depends upon party control. Gallup. https://news.gallup.com/poll/697421/trust–government–depends–upon–party–control.aspx

40.

Jones

(1996). Trust as an affective attitude. Ethics, 107(1), 4–25. https://doi.org/10.1086/233694

41.

Kant

(2017[1797]). The metaphysics of morals. Cambridge University Press.

42.

Keele

(2007). Social capital and the dynamics of trust in government. American Journal of Political Science, 51(2), 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00248.x

43.

Kennedy

Tyson

(2023). Americans’ trust in scientists, positive views of science continue to decline. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2023/11/14/americans-trust-in-scientists-positive-views-of-science-continue-to-decline/.

44.

Klein

Robison

(2020). Like, post, and distrust? How social media use affects trust in government. Political Communication, 37(1), 46–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1661891

45.

Krause

N. M.

Brossard

Scheufele

D. A.

Xenos

M. A.

Franke

(2019). Trends—Americans’ trust in science and scientists. Public Opinion Quarterly, 83(4), 817–836.

46.

Lambert

(2025). Ted cruz’s list of “woke” science includes self-driving cars and solar eclipses. National Public Radio. https://www.npr.org/2025/02/13/nx-s1-5295043/sen-ted-cruzs-list-of-woke-science-includes-self-driving-cars-solar-eclipses.

47.

Lee

J. J.

(2021). Party polarization and trust in science: What about Democrats? Socius, 7, 23780231211010101. https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231211010101

48.

Levi

Stoker

(2000). Political trust and trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science, 3(1), 475–507. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.475

49.

Lin

Lunz Trujillo

(2025). Urban-rural differences in respect for the norms of American civil-military relations. American Politics Research, 53(1), 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x241263085

50.

Lowndes

(2017). Populism in the United States. In The Oxford handbook of populism (pp. 232–247). Oxford University Press.

51.

Lunz Trujillo

(2022). Rural identity as a contributing factor to anti-intellectualism in the u.s. Political Behavior, 44(3), 1509–1532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-022-09770-w

52.

Lunz Trujillo

(2026). Final replication materials for “What drives a contemporary lack of trust in government and science in the United States?” Harvard Dataverse. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/RSWNXI

53.

Macedo

Lee

(2025). In Covid’s wake: How our politics failed us. Princeton University Press.

54.

Mason

(2018). Uncivil agreement: How politics became our identity. University of Chicago Press.

55.

Mayer

R. C.

Davis

J. H.

Schoorman

F. D.

(1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. https://doi.org/10.2307/258792

56.

McKenzie-McHarg

Soyer

(2021). Anger, grievance, resentment: We need to understand how anti-vaxxers feel to make sense of their actions. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/anger–grievance–resentment–we–need–to–understand–how–anti–vaxxers–feel–to–make–sense–of–their–actions–169829

57.

Merkley

(2020). Anti-intellectualism, populism, and motivated resistance to expert consensus. Public Opinion Quarterly, 84(1), 24–48. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfz053

58.

Milkoreit

Smith

E. K.

(2025). Rapidly diverging public trust in science in the United States. Public Understanding of Science, 34(5), 616–627. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625241302970

59.

Motta

(2018). The dynamics and political implications of anti-intellectualism in the United States. American Politics Research, 46(3), 465–498. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x17719507

60.

Motta

(2024). Anti-Scientific Americans: The prevalence, origins, and political consequences of anti-intellectualism in the U.S. Oxford University Press.

61.

Oliver

J. E.

Rahn

W. M.

(2016). Rise of the trumpenvolk: Populism in the 2016 election. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 667(1), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716216662639

62.

Putnam

R. D.

(2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon and schuster.

63.

PytlikZillig

L. M.

Kimbrough

C. D.

(2016). Consensus on conceptualizations and definitions of trust: Are we there yet? Springer.

64.

Rhodes-Purdy

Navarre

Utych

S. M.

(2021). Populist psychology: Economics, culture, and emotions. The Journal of Politics, 83(4), 1559–1572. https://doi.org/10.1086/715168

65.

Rienks

(2023). Corruption, scandals and incompetence: Do voters care? European Journal of Political Economy, 79, 102441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2023.102441

66.

Robbins

B. G.

(2014). On the origins of trust. PhD. thesis. University of Washington (Department of Sociology).

67.

Rothstein

(2020). Trust is the key to fighting the pandemic. Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/observations/trust–is–the–key–to–fighting–the–pandemic/

68.

Russell

J. H.

Patterson

(2025). The weaponization of expertise: How elites fuel populism. MIT Press.

69.

Saad

(2023). Retail, pharmaceutical industries slip in public esteem. Gallup. https://news.gallup.com/poll/510641/retail-pharmaceutical-industries-slip-public-esteem.aspx.

70.

Schoorman

F. D.

Mayer

R. C.

Davis

J. H.

(2007). An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 709–734. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.24348410

71.

Schulman

Druckman

J. N.

Safarpour

Baum

M. A.

Ognyanova

Lunz Trujillo

Mathé

A. Q.

Uslu

A. A.

Perlis

R. H.

(2026). Continuity and change in trust in scientists in the United States: Demographic stability and partisan polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 89(4), 1200–1238. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfaf059

72.

Singh

Eisenberg

M. D.

Sood

(2023). Factors associated with public trust in pharmaceutical manufacturers. JAMA Network Open, 6(3), e233002. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.3002

73.

Stagnaro

Druckman

Berinsky

Arechar

A. A.

Willer

Rand

(2024). Representativeness and response validity across nine opt-in online samples. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/h9j2d_v2

74.

Tocqueville

A. d.

(2000[1835/1840]). Democracy in America Mansfield

(H. C.

Winthrop

, Trans.). University of Chicago Press.

75.

Tyler

Jackson

(2014). Popular legitimacy and the exercise of legal authority: Motivating compliance, cooperation, and engagement. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20(1), 78–95. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034514

76.

Tyson

Kennedy

(2024). Public trust in scientists and views on their role in policymaking. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2024/11/14/public–trust–in–scientists–and–views–on–their–role–in–policymaking

77.

Uslaner

E. M.

(2000). Producing and consuming trust. Political Science Quarterly, 115(4), 569–590. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657610

78.

Uslaner

E. M.

(2002). The moral foundations of trust. Cambridge University Press.

79.

Valgarðsson

Jennings

Stoker

Bunting

Devine

McKay

Klassen

(2025). A crisis of political trust? Global trends in institutional trust from 1958 to 2019. British Journal of Political Science, 55, e15.

80.

van Stekelenburg

Klandermans

(2018). In politics we trust. or not? Trusting and distrusting demonstrators compared. Political Psychology, 39(4), 775–792. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12464

81.

Webster

S. W.

(2020). American rage: How anger shapes our politics. Cambridge University Press.

82.

Webster

S. W.

Connors

E. C.

Sinclair

(2022). The social consequences of political anger. The Journal of Politics, 84(3), 1292–1305. https://doi.org/10.1086/718979

What Drives a Contemporary Lack of Trust in Government and Science in the United States?

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References