The Netherlands has always been the odd case out regarding trust in public institutions. In the 1980s and 1990s, contrary to international trends, trust in government remained high and even increased. Suddenly, from 2002 onwards, public trust in government declined dramatically. In this article we examine the plausibility of ten explanations, embedded in the international scholarly literature, and explore whether they are empirically supported or rebutted in case of the Dutch drop. We find that because most of the literature concentrates on the cross-national erosion of political support over a long period within Western democracies, explanations tend to focus on gradual, long-term demographic, social, and political trends. Sudden dips in trust levels, however, require different sets of explanatory factors; they are better explained by political or economic contingencies, such as sudden political or economic crises. In the case of the Dutch drop, the most plausible explanation is a combination of an economic decline, combined with high political instability and contestation during the first Balkenende cabinets. As of 2007, with a new cabinet in office, and an economic recovery in place, trust figures are on the rise again.
Points for practitioners
Sudden dips in public trust in government are better explained by political or economic contingencies, such as political or economic crises, than by a deterioration in government performance or by long-term demographic, social, and political trends. In the case of the sudden drop in trust in The Netherlands, the most plausible explanation is a combination of an economic decline, combined with high political instability and contestation during the first Balkenende cabinets. As of 2007, with a new cabinet in office, and economic recovery in place, trust figures are on the rise again.
Aarts, K. (2005) `Dwarse Kiezers', Inaugural address, Universiteit Twente.
2.
Becker, J. and Dekker, P. (2005) `Beeld van beleid en politiek', in Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau, De sociale staat van Nederland 2005, pp. 328-62. Den Haag: SCP.
3.
Belevingsmonitor Zomer2005 (2006) Onderzoek naar de beleving van maatschappelijke onderwerpen door de Nederlandse bevolking. Den Haag: Voorlichtingsraad ( www.regering.nl).
4.
Bouckaert, G. and van de Walle, S. (2003) `Comparing Measures of Citizen Trust and User Satisfaction as Indicators of "Good Governance": Difficulties in Linking Trust and Satisfaction Indicators', International Review of Administrative Sciences69(2): 329-43.
5.
Bouckaert, G., van de Walle, S. and Kampen, J. (2005) `Potential for Comparative Public Opinion Research in Public Administration', International Review of Administrative Sciences71(2): 229-40.
6.
Bovens, M. (2006) `Het ongelijk van Ien Dales: Over de onbedoelde negatieve effecten van het integriteitsbeleid', Bestuurskunde15(1): 64-74.
7.
Bowler, S. and Karp, J. (2004) `Politicians, Scandals, and Trust in Government' , Political Behavior26(3): 271-87.
8.
Brants, K. and van Praag, P. (2002) `De Media hebben het gedaan', in K. Brants and P. van Praag (eds) Politiek en Media in Verwarring: de verkiezingscampagnes in het lange jaar 2002, pp. 1-20. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis.
9.
Cappella, J. and Hall Jamieson, K. (1997) Spiral of Cynicism: The Press and the Public Good. New York: Oxford University Press.
10.
Catterberg, G. and Moreno, A. (2005) `The Individual Bases of Political Trust: Trends in New and Established Democracies', International Journal of Public Opinion Research18(1): 31-48.
11.
Citrin J. and Muste, C. (1999) `Trust in Government', in J. Robinson, P. Shaver and L. Wrightsman (eds) Measures of Political Attitudes, Vol. 2, pp. 465-532. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
12.
Cook, T. and Grongke, P. (2005) `The Sceptical American', The Journal of Politics67(3): 784-803.
13.
Dalton, R. (2000) `Value Change and Democracy', in S. Pharr and R. Putnam (eds) Disaffected Democracies. What is Troubling the Trilateral Countries?, pp. 252-69. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
Dalton, R. (2004) Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices. The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
Dekker, P. and van der Meer, T. (2004) `Politiek Vertrouwen', Tijdschrift voor de Sociale Sector58(10): 33-5.
16.
Dekker, P., Halman, L. and van der Meer, T. (2006) `Ontwikkelingen in politiek vertrouwen in Europa, 1981-2004', in A. Korsten and P. de Goede (eds) Bouwen aan vertrouwen in het openbaar bestuur. Den Haag : Elsevier.
17.
De Vreese, C. (2005) `The Spiral of Cynicism Reconsidered', European Journal of Communication20(3): 283-301.
18.
Dogan, M. (2005) `Erosion of Confidence in Thirty European Democracies' , Comparative Sociology4(1-2): 11-53.
19.
Elchardus, M. (2002) De dramademocratie. Tielt: Lannoo.
20.
Elchardus, M. and Smits, W. (2002) Anatomie en oorzaken van het wantrouwen. Brussels: VUB-Press.
21.
Goodsell, C. (1994) The Case for Bureaucracy: A Public Administration Polemic. Chatham: Chatham House .
22.
Gross, K., Aday, S. and Brewer, P.R. (2004) `A Panel of Media Effects on Political and Social Trust after September 11, 2001', Press/Politics9(4): 49-73.
23.
Hardin, R. (2000) `The Public Trust', in S. Pharr and R. Putnam (eds) Disaffected Democracies: What is Troubling the Trilateral Countries?, pp. 31-51. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
24.
Hetherington, M. (2005) Why Trust Matters: Declining Political Trust and the Demise of American Liberalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25.
Holsteyn, J. and de Ridder, J. (2005) Alles blijft anders: Nederlandse kiezers en verkiezingen in het begin van de 21e eeuw. Amsterdam: Aksant.
26.
Hooghe, M. (2004) `Political Socialization and the Future of Politics' , Acta Politica39(4): 331-41.
27.
Kaase, M. and Newton, K. (eds) (1995) Beliefs in Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
King, A. (2000) `Distrust of Government: Explaining American Exceptionalism' , in S. Pharr and R. Putnam (eds) Disaffected Democracies: What is Troubling the Trilateral Countries?, pp. 74-98. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press.
29.
Mishler, W. and Rose, R. (2001) `What are the Origins of Political Trust? Testing Institutional and Cultural Theories in Post-communist Societies', Comparative Political Studies34(1): 30-62.
30.
Mutz, D. and Reeves, B. (2005) `The New Videomalaise: Effects of Televised Incivility on Political Trust', American Political Science Review99(1): 1-15.
31.
Newton, K. (1999) `Politics and the News Media: Mobilization or Media Malaise?', British Journal of Political Science29: 577-99.
32.
Newton, K. (2006) `May the Weak Force be with You: The Power of the Mass Media in Modern Politics', European Journal of Political Research45: 209-34.
33.
Norris, P. (ed.) (1999) Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
34.
Norris, P. (2000) A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Post-industrial Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35.
Nye, J., Zelikow, P. and King, D. (eds) ( 1997) Why People don't Trust Government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36.
Patterson, T. (1993) Out of Order. New York: Knopf.
37.
Pharr, S. and Putnam, R. (eds) (2000) Disaffected Democracies: What is Troubling the Trilateral Countries?Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38.
Prast, H., Morsch, R. and van Raaij, W. (2005) Vertrouwen, cement van de samenleving en aanjager van de economie. Amsterdam: De Nederlandse Bank/Universiteit van Tilburg.
39.
Putnam, R. (1995) `Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital' , Journal of Democracy6(1): 65-78.
40.
Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau (2002) Sociaal en cultureel rapport 2002: De kwaliteit van de quartaire sector . Den Haag: SCP.
41.
Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau (2005) De sociale staat van Nederland 2005. Den Haag: SCP.
42.
Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau (2007) De sociale staat van Nederland 2007. Den Haag: SCP.
43.
Stimson, J.A. (2004) Tides of Consent. How Public Opinion Shapes American Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
Tammes, Peter and Dekker, Paul (2007) `Het opinieklimaat', in Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau, De sociale staat van Nederland 2007, pp. 57-83. Den Haag: SCP.
45.
Thomassen, J. (2005) `Nederlanders en Europa. Een bekoelde liefde', in K. Aarts and H. van der Kolk (eds) Nederlanders en Europa: het referendum over de Europese grondwet. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Bert Bakker.
46.
Tiemeijer, W. (2006) `Het geheim van de burger: Over staat en opinieonderzoek.' PhD dissertation, Universiteit van Tilburg.
47.
Tiemeijer, W.L. (2008) Wat 93,7% van de Nederlanders zou moeten weten over opiniepeilingen. Amsterdam.
48.
Van der Brug, W. (2003) `How the LPF Fuelled Discontent: Empirical Tests of Explanations of LPF Support', Acta Politica38(1): 89-106.
49.
Van der Brug, W. and Pellikaan, H. (2003) `Preface', in `Electoral Revolt or Continuity? The Dutch Parliamentary Elections 2002 and 2003', Special Issue, Acta Politica38(1): 1-4.
50.
Van der Brug, W. and van der Eijk, C. (2005) `Welke effecten hadden de campagnes nu eigenlijk?', in K. Brants and P. van Praag (eds) Politiek en Media in Verwarring: de verkiezingscampagnes in het lange jaar 2002, pp. 244-67. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis .
51.
Van der Brug, W. and van Praag, P. (2007) `Erosion of Support for Political Institutions in the Netherlands: Structural or Temporarily? A Research Note', Acta Politica42(4): 443-58.
52.
Van de Walle, S. (2004) `Perceptions of Administrative Performance: The Key to Trust in Governments?' PhD dissertation, K.U. Leuven .
53.
Van de Walle, S. and Bouckaert, G. (2003) `Public Service Performance and Trust in Government: The Problem of Causality', International Journal of Public Administration26(8&9): 891-913.
54.
Van de Walle, S. and Kampen, J. (2004) `Maatschappelijke Stemmingen als determinant van consumentenvertrouwen en politiek vertrouwen', Tijdschrift voor Economie en ManagementXLIX(3): 481-94.
55.
Van Praag, P. (2003) `The Winners and Losers in a Turbulent Political Year', Acta Politica38(1): 5-22.
56.
Van Praag, P. and van der Brug, W. (2006) `Dalend vertrouwen: tijdelijk of blijvend?', in A. Korsten and P. de Goede (eds) Bouwen aan vertrouwen in het openbaar bestuur, pp. 31-44. Den Haag: Elsevier.
57.
Van Praag, P. and van der Eijk, C. (1998) `News Content and Effects in an Historic Campaign', Political Communication15(2): 165-83.
58.
Wille, A. (2005) `Kamervragen en de Dagelijkse Drang van Politieke Controle', Bestuurswetenschappen59(5): 406-30.
59.
WRR (2005) Vertrouwen in de buurt . Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
60.
Zaller, J. (1996) `The Myth of Massive Media Impact Revived: New Support for a Discredited Idea', in D.C. Mutz, P.M. Sniderman and R.A. Brody (eds) Political Persuasion and Attitude Change, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
61.
Zmerli, S., Newton, K. and Montero, J.R. (2006) `Trust in People, Confidence in Political Institutions, and Satisfaction with Democracy', in Jan Van Deth, Jose Ramon Montero and Anders Westholm (eds) Citizenship and Involvement in European Democracies. London: Routledge.
62.
Zouridis, S. (2004) Wegen naar vertrouwen. Leusden : BMG.
