Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Does partisanship shape local officials’ opposition and resistance to state preemption? To answer this question, I report on two pre-post, between-subjects survey experiments and open-ended responses from more than 1,000 local government officers. Across both experiments, I find that local officials are substantially more opposed to preemption from an out-party state government and significantly more supportive of preemption from an in-party state government. Moreover, local officials are more (less) willing to take action to resist preemption—including legal action, refusing to comply, initiating a resolution, and advocating for more autonomy—when they learn that an out-party (in-party) state government is attempting preemption. The open-ended responses of local officials corroborate the results of the survey experiments. This research has important implications for state-local government relations and how elected governments represent their constituents in our federal system.

Keywords

intergovernmental relations state politics local politics preemption partisanship

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abramowitz

A. I.

Webster

S. W.

(2018). Negative partisanship: Why Americans dislike parties but behave like rabid partisans. Political Psychology, 39(S1), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12479

Anzia

S. F.

(2021). Party and Ideology in American Local Government: An Appraisal. Annual Review of Political Science, 24(1), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041719-102131

Arceneaux

(2005). Does federalism weaken democratic representation in the United States? Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 35(2), 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pji015

Arnold

R. D.

Carnes

(2012). Holding mayors accountable: New York’s executives from Koch to bloomberg. American Journal of Political Science, 56(4), 949–963. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00603.x

Artiles

(2024). Preemption in the intergovernmental trenches: Explaining gubernatorial preemption style during COVID-19. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 24(3), 229–249. https://doi.org/10.1017/spq.2024.12

Ballotpedia . (2023). Preemption conflicts between state and local governments. https://ballotpedia.org/Preemption_conflicts_between_state_and_local_governments#Other

Barber

Dynes

A. M.

(2023). City-state ideological congruence and municipal preemption. American Journal of Political Science, 67(1), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12655

Berry

C. R.

Howell

W. G.

(2007). Accountability and local elections: Rethinking retrospective voting. The Journal of Politics, 69(3), 844–858. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00579.x

Boudreau

Elmendorf

C. S.

MacKenzie

S. A.

(2015). Lost in Space? Information Shortcuts, Spatial Voting, and Local Government Representation. Political Research Quarterly, 68(4), 843–855. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912915609437

10.

Briffault

(2018). The challenge of the new preemption. Stanford Law Review, 70, 1202–1995. https://review.law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2018/06/70-Stan.-L.-Rev.-1995.pdf

11.

Briffault

(2023). Preemption of city authority in America. https://www.usmayors.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/USCM-Briffault-Preemption-Summary-June-4-2023.pdf

12.

Burnett

C. M.

Kogan

(2017). The politics of potholes: Service quality and retrospective voting in local elections. The Journal of Politics, 79(1), 302–314. https://doi.org/10.1086/688736

13.

Ciuk

D. J.

Yost

B. A.

(2016). The effects of issue salience, elite influence, and policy content on public opinion. Political Communication, 33(2), 328–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2015.1017629

14.

Clifford

Sheagley

Piston

(2021). Increasing precision without altering treatment effects: Repeated measures designs in survey experiments. American Political Science Review, 115(3), 1048–1065. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055421000241

15.

Cockerham

A. G.

Crew

R. E.

(2017). Factors affecting governors’ decisions to issue executive orders. State and Local Government Review, 49(1), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323x17702702

16.

Connolly

J. M.

Mason

D. P.

(2016). Ideology and local public expenditure priorities. Political Research Quarterly, 69(4), 830–841. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912916665702

17.

Cooper

(2022). Executive order 271: Growing North Carolina’s zero-emission vehicle market. https://governor.nc.gov/executive-order-no-271

18.

Cox

G. W.

McCubbins

M. D.

(2005). Setting the agenda. Cambridge University Press.

19.

de Benedictis-Kessner

Warshaw

(2016). Mayoral partisanship and municipal fiscal policy. The Journal of Politics, 78(4), 1124–1138. https://doi.org/10.1086/686308

20.

de Benedictis-Kessner

Warshaw

(2019). Politics in forgotten governments: The partisan composition of county legislatures and county fiscal policies. The Journal of Politics, 82(2), 460–475. https://doi.org/10.1086/706458

21.

Deguzman

(2025). Appeals court upholds Texas law limiting cities’ enforcement of local ordinances. https://www.texastribune.org/2025/07/18/texas-legislature-death-star-law-city-ordinances-limits/#:˜:text=The20bill20prevents20cities20and20counties20from,state20is20to20blame20for20their20concerns

22.

Dyck

J. J.

Pearson-Merkowitz

(2014). To know you is not necessarily to love you: The partisan mediators of intergroup contact. Political Behavior, 36(3), 553–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-013-9240-6

23.

Dyck

J. J.

Pearson-Merkowitz

(2023). The power of partisanship. Oxford University Press.

24.

Einstein

K. L.

Glick

D. M.

(2017). Cities in American federalism: Evidence on state-local conflict from a survey of mayors. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 47(4), 599–621. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjx026

25.

Einstein

K. L.

Glick

D. M.

(2018). Mayors, Partisanship, and Redistribution: Evidence Directly from U.S. Mayors. Urban Affairs Review, 54(1), 74–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087416674829

26.

Einstein

K. L.

Kogan

(2016). Pushing the City Limits: Policy Responsiveness in Municipal Government. Urban Affairs Review, 52(1), 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087414568027

27.

Fitzgerald

(2021). Preemption of green cities in red states. https://www.planetizen.com/blogs/114584-preemption-green-cities-red-states/

28.

Florida Legislature . (2024). The 2024 Florida statutes. https://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0400-0499/0403/Sections/0403.182.html

29.

Fowler

Kettler

J. J.

(2021). Are Republicans bad for the environment? State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 21(2), 195–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532440020941794

30.

Fowler

Witt

(2019). State Preemption of Local Authority: Explaining Patterns of State Adoption of Preemption Measures. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 49(3), 540–559. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjz011

31.

Frisman

(2017). Red light and speed cameras. https://cga.ct.gov/2017/rpt/pdf/2017-R-0217.pdf

32.

Gerber

E. R.

(2013). Partisanship and local climate policy. Cityscape, 15(1), 107–124. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41958959.

33.

Goho

S. A.

(2012). Municipalities and hydraulic fracturing: Trends in state preemption. Planning & Environmental Law, 64(7), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/15480755.2012.699757

34.

Goldstein

Young

H. Y.

(2017). Cities as lobbyists. American Journal of Political Science, 61(4), 864–876. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12306

35.

Goodman

C. B.

Hatch

M. E.

(2024). Why states preempt city ordinances: The case of workers’ rights laws. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 54(1), 121–145. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjad023

36.

Goodman

C. B.

Hatch

M. E.

McDonald

B. D.

(2021). State preemption of local laws: Origins and modern trends. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 4(2), 146–158. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvaa018

37.

Governors Highway Safety Association . (2023). Speed and red light cameras. https://www.ghsa.org/state-laws/issues/speed_and_red_light_cameras

38.

Hajnal

Z. L.

Trounstine

(2010). Who or What Governs?: The Effects of Economics, Politics, Institutions, and Needs on Local Spending. American Politics Research, 38(6), 1130–1163. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X10362870

39.

Hall

M. A.

Mann-Jackson

Rhodes

S. D.

(2021). State preemption of local immigration sanctuary policies: Legal considerations. American Journal of Public Health, 111(2), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.306018

40.

Hicks

W. D.

Weissert

C. S.

Swanson

Bulman-Pozen

Kogan

Riverstone-Newell

Bunch

Einstein

K. L.

Glick

Daley

D. M.

Fisk

J. M.

Taylor

J. K.

Haider-Markel

D. P.

Lewis

D. C.

(2018). Home rule be damned: Exploring policy conflicts between the statehouse and city hall. PS: Political Science & Politics, 51(1), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096517001421

41.

Hobbs

(2023). Executive order 11: Protecting freedom and healthcare in Arizona. https://azgovernor.gov/office-arizona-governor/executive-order/2023-11

42.

Hochul

(2023). Executive order 30: Directing state agencies, authorities, and entities to prioritize the allocation of certain discretionary funds to localities that promote the construction of housing. https://www.governor.ny.gov/executive-order/no-30-directing-state-agencies-authorities-and-entities-prioritize-allocation

43.

Hopkins

D. J.

(2018). The increasingly United States: How and why American political behavior nationalized. The University of Chicago Press.

44.

Hopkins

D. J.

Pettingill

L. M.

(2018). Retrospective voting in big-city U.S. mayoral elections. Political Science Research and Methods, 6(4), 697–714. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2016.54

45.

Howell

S. E.

Perry

H. L.

(2004). Black mayors/white mayors: Explaining their approval. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68(1), 32–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfh003

46.

Kogan

(2017). Means, motives, and opportunities in the new preemption wars. PS: Political Science and Politics, 51(1), 28–31. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Means%2C+Motives%2C+and+Opportunities+in+the+New+Preemption+Wars&author=Kogan+Vladimir&publication+year=2018&journal=PS%3A+Political+Science+%26+Politics&volume=51&pages=28-29

47.

Leber

(2021). An ‘attack on American cities’ is freezing climate action in its tracks. https://www.vox.com/22691755/gas-utilities-fight-electrification-preemption

48.

McBrayer

Williams

R. L.

Eckelman

(2020). Local Officials as Partisan Operatives: The Effect of County Officials on Early Voting Administration. Social Science Quarterly, 101(4), 1475–1488. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ssqu.12815

49.

McKenna

(2016). GOP and democratic platforms highlight Stark differences on energy and climate. https://insideclimatenews.org/news/26072016/democrat-republican-party-platforms-energy-climate-change-hillary-clinton-donald-trump/

50.

Miratrix

L. W.

Sekhon

J. S.

Theodordis

A. G.

Campos

L. F.

(2018). Worth weight? How to think about and use weights in survey experiments. Political Analysis, 26(3), 275–291. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2018.1

51.

Municipal Technical Advisory Service . (2023). Traffic control & safety regulations. https://www.mtas.tennessee.edu/node/144418/printable/pdf

52.

Mutz

D. C.

(2011). Population-based survey experiments. Princeton University Press.

53.

National League of Cities . (2018). City rights in an era of preemption: A state-by-state analysis. https://www.nlc.org/resource/city-rights-in-an-era-of-preemption-a-state-by-state-analysis/

54.

National Conference of State Legislatures . (2023). Traffic safety review: State speed and red-light camera laws and programs. https://www.ncsl.org/transportation/traffic-safety-review-state-speed-and-red-light-camera-laws-and-programs

55.

National League of Cities . (2022). City councils. https://www.nlc.org/city-councils/

56.

New America . (2022). Part two: How to address preemption? https://www.newamerica.org/political-reform/reports/punching-down/part-two-how-to-address-preemption/

57.

Nicholson

S. P.

(2012). Polarizing cues. American Journal of Political Science, 56(1), 52–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00541.x

58.

Nolon

J. R.

(2002). In praise of parochialism: The advent of local environmental law. Harvard Environmental Law Review, 26(1), 365–416. https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1174&context=lawfaculty.

59.

Payson

J. A.

(2020). The partisan logic of city mobilization: Evidence from state lobbying disclosures. American Political Science Review, 114(3), 677–690. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055420000118

60.

Pearson-Merkowitz

Dyck

J. J.

(2017). Crime and partisanship: How party ID muddles reality, perception, and policy attitudes on crime and guns. Social Science Quarterly, 98(2), 443–454. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ssqu.12417

61.

Pearson-Merkowitz

Filindra

Dyck

J. J.

(2016). When partisans and minorities interact: Interpersonal contact, partisanship, and public opinion preferences on immigration policy. Social Science Quarterly, 97(2), 311–324. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ssqu.12175

62.

Pearson-Merkowitz

Lang

(2016). The geographic polarization of American voters. The Geography Teacher, 13(3), 112–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/19338341.2016.1196596

63.

Percival

G. L.

Johnson

Neiman

(2009). Representation and Local Policy: Relating County-Level Public Opinion to Policy Outputs. Political Research Quarterly, 62(1), 164–177. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1065912908316341

64.

Perry

(2023). More states are banning plastic bags. Florida is not among them. https://floridaphoenix.com/2023/11/29/more-states-are-banning-plastic-bags-florida-is-not-among-them/

65.

Pomeranz

J. L.

Silver

Lieff

S. A.

(2021). State gun-control, gun-rights, and preemptive firearm-related laws across 50 U.S. states for 2009-18. American Journal of Public Health, 111(7), 1273–1280. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306287

66.

Pough

(2018). Understanding the rise of super preemption in state legislatures. Journal of Law & Politics, 34(1), 67–116. https://www.lawandpolitics.org/hifi/files/issues/vol-xxxiv-no-1-fall-2018/Pough_article_final_10.08.18.pdf

67.

Riverstone-Newell

(2017). The rise of state preemption laws in response to local policy innovation. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 47(3), 403–425. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjx037

68.

Rodriguez

(2025a). Boise mayor sends letter to Idaho AG reaffirming pride flag stance. https://www.ktvb.com/article/news/local/boise-mayor-letter-ag-saying-stand-my-community/277-d46fce62-6517-4243-9944-f13233f20354

69.

Rodriguez

(2025b). Boise city council approves resolution adopting pride flag as official flag amid state law tensions. https://www.ktvb.com/article/news/local/bosie-city-council-approves-flag-resolution-adopting-pride-flag-official-city-flag/277-1b75bb76-a807-4c7a-b862-b2ddb7c9aae1

70.

Rutkow

McGinty

Wetter

Vernick

(2019). Local public health policymakers’ views on state preemption: Results of a national survey, 2018. American Journal of Public Health, 109(8), 1107–1110. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2019.305140

71.

Salman

A. A.

Kopp

B. J.

Thomas

J. E.

Ring

Fetehi

(2020). What are the priming and ceiling effects of one experience measure on another? Journal of Patient Experience, 7(6), 1755–1759. https://doi.org/10.1177/2374373520951670

72.

Sances

M. W.

(2018). Ideology and vote choice in U.S. mayoral elections: Evidence from Facebook surveys. Political Behavior, 40(2), 737–762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-017-9420-x

73.

SoRelle

M. E.

Walker

A. N.

(2016). Partisan preemption: The strategic use of federal preemption legislation. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 46(4), 486–509. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjw005

74.

Squire

(2007). Measuring state legislative professionalism: The Squire index revisited. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 7(2), 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/153244000700700208

75.

Swindell

Svara

J. H.

Stenberg

(2018). Local government options in the era of state preemption. Local Government Review, 100(6), 8–13. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Local+Government+Options+in+the+Era+of+State+Preemption.&author=David+Swindell&author=James+Svara&author=Carl+Stenberg&publication_year=2018&journal=Local+Government+Review&pages=8-13

76.

Tausanovitch

Warshaw

(2014). Representation in municipal government. American Political Science Review, 108(3), 605–641. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055414000318

77.

Warshaw

(2019). Local elections and representation in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22(1), 461–479. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050317-071108

78.

Weissert

C. S.

Uttermark

M. J.

Mackie

K. R.

Artiles

(2021). Governors in control: Executive orders, state-local Preemption, and the COVID-19 pandemic. Publius, 51(3), 396–428. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjab013

79.

Wolman

Manmon

Bell

M. E.

Brunori

(2010). Comparing local government autonomy across states. In Bell

M. E.

Brunori

Youngman

(Eds.), The property tax and local autonomy (pp. 69–114). Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.64 MB

Concede or Resist? Experimental Evidence on How Partisanship Shapes Local Officials’ Responses to Preemption

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material