A Thermostatic Model of Congressional Elections

Abstract

Are policymakers rewarded in elections when they succeed in moving public policy in their ideological direction? Or do they face a thermostatic backlash, as citizens judge their policy moves as too hot or too cold? Our analysis of Congressional election outcomes since 1948 adds information on Congressional policy actions to traditional election models emphasizing the surge and decline of presidential support and referendums based on presidential approval and the economy. We find that the electorate reacts to the ideological direction of policy, voting against parties that push policy further to the left or the right in both midterm and presidential years. Even after accounting for policy and traditional explanations, however, there remains a large midterm penalty for the president’s party.

Keywords

policy major laws coattails balancing midterm loss backlash

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abramowitz

(1988). An improved model for predicting presidential election outcomes. PS: Political Science and Politics, 21(04), 843–847. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096500034235

Achen

C. H.

Bartels

(2016). Democracy for realists. Princeton University Press.

Alesina

Howard

(1995). Partisan politics, divided government, and the economy. Cambridge University Press.

Algara

(2021). Congressional approval and responsible party government. Political Behavior. Online First at. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11109-021-09678-x

Arrington

(2019). The seats/votes relationship in the U.S. House 1972-2018. Sabato’s crystal ball. Available at. https://centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/articles/the-seats-votes-relationship-in-the-u-s-house-1972-2018/

Atkinson

M. L.

(2017). Combative politics. University of Chicago Press.

Azari

(2014). Delivering the people’s message. Cornell University Press.

Bafumi

Erikson

R. S.

Wlezien

(2010). Balancing, generic Polls and midterm congressional elections congressional elections. The Journal of Politics, 72(3), 705–719. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381610000113

Bolstad

(2012). Thermostatic voting: Presidential elections in light of new policy data. PS: Political Science and Politics, 45(1), 44–50. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096511001697

10.

Campbell

(1966). “Surge and decline: A study of electoral change.” In Campbell

Converse

P. E.

Miller

W. E.

Stokes

D. E.

(eds.), Elections and the political order. Wiley, pps 40-62.

11.

Campbell

J. E.

(1991). The presidential surge and its midterm decline in congressional elections, 1868-1988 elections. The Journal of Politics, 53(2), 477–487. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381600048404

12.

Cayton

Dawkins

(2021). Incongruent voting or symbolic representation? Perspectives on Politics, 20(3), 916–930.

13.

Erikson

R. S.

(1988). The puzzle of midterm loss. The Journal of Politics, 50(4), 1011–1029. https://doi.org/10.2307/2131389

14.

Erikson

R. S.

MacKuen

Stimson

(2002). The macro polity. University Press.

15.

Erikson

R. S.

Wlezien

(2012). The timeline of presidential elections. University of Chicago Press.

16.

Fiorina

(1996). Divided government. Allyn & Bacon.

17.

Fowler

Hill

S. J.

Lewis

J. B.

Tausanovitch

Vavreck

Warshaw

(2023). Moderates. American Political Science Review, 117(2), 643–660. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055422000818

18.

Gans

(2019). “Midterm Decline in Comparative Perspective.”. Bowdoin Working paper. https://digitalcommons.bowdoin.edu/honorsprojects/121.

19.

Grossmann

(2014). Artists of the possible. Oxford University Press.

20.

Grossmann

(2018). Voters like a political party until it passes laws. FiveThirtyEight. https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/voters-like-a-political-party-until-it-passes-laws/

21.

Hall

A. B.

Thompson

D. M.

(2018). Who punishes extremist nominees? American Political Science Review, 112(3), 509–524. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055418000023

22.

Hill

S. J.

(2017). Changing votes or changing voters? Electoral Studies, 48(2), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2017.06.001

23.

Jacobson

Gary

(2008). The Politics of Congressional Elections, 7th edition. Pearson.

24.

Jacobson

G. C.

(2023). The 2022 elections: A test of democracy’s resilience and the referendum theory of midterms. Political Science Quarterly. Forthcoming.

25.

Mayhew

D. R.

(1991). Divided we govern. Yale University Press.

26.

Nyhan

McGhee

Sides

Masket

Greene

(2012). One vote out of step? American Politics Research, 40(5), 844–879.

27.

Oppenheimer

B. I.

Stimson

J. A.

Waterman

R. W.

(1986). Interpreting U. S. Congressional elections: The exposure thesis. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 11(2), 227–247. https://doi.org/10.2307/439877

28.

Pacheco

(2013). The thermostatic model of responsiveness in the American states. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 13(3), 306–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532440013487388

29.

Shaw

Petrocik

J. R.

(2019). The turnout myth: Voting rates and partisan outcomes in American national elections. Oxford University Press.

30.

Sides

Tausanovitch

Vavreck

(2022). The bitter end. Princeton University Press.

31.

Smidt

C. D.

(2017). Polarization and the decline of the American floating voter. American Journal of Political Science, 61(2), 365–381. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12218

32.

Soroka

Wlezien

(2010). Degrees of democracy. Cambridge University Press.

33.

Soroka

Wlezien

(2022). Information and democracy: Public policy in the news. Cambridge University Press.

34.

The Economist . (2023). America’s 117th Congress accomplished a lot. So did its recent predecessors. Available at. https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2023/01/03/americas-117th-congress-accomplished-a-lot-so-did-its-recent-predecessors

35.

Tufte

E. R.

(1975). Determinants of the outcomes of midterm congressional elections. American Political Science Review, 69(3), 812–826. https://doi.org/10.2307/1958391

36.

Weber

(2021). Voice and balancing in U.S. Congressional elections. Perspectives on Politics. Online First at.https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/perspectives-on-politics/article/voice-and-balancing-in-us-congressional-elections/0F1824305EBC188B8F4A3714A29716AC

37.

Wlezien

(1995). The public as thermostat: Dynamics of preferences for spending. American Journal of Political Science, 39(4), 981–1000. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111666

38.

Wlezien

(2017). Policy (mis) representation and the cost of ruling: U.S. Presidential elections in comparative perspective. Comparative Political Studies, 50(6), 711–738. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414015626446

39.

Wrighton

J. M.

Squire

(1997). Uncontested seats and electoral competition for the U.S. House of Representatives over time. The Journal of Politics, 59(2), 452–468. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381600053524

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.53 MB