The Economic Origins of Authoritarian Values: Evidence From Local Trade Shocks in the United Kingdom

Abstract

What explains the backlash against the liberal international order? Are its causes economic or cultural? We argue that while cultural values are central to understanding the backlash, those values are, in part, endogenous and shaped by long-run economic change. Using an original survey of the British population, we show that individuals living in regions where the local labor market was more substantially affected by imports from China have significantly more authoritarian values and that this relationship is driven by the effect of economic change on authoritarian aggression. This result is consistent with a frustration-aggression mechanism by which large economic shocks hinder individuals’ expected attainment of their goals. This study provides a theoretical mechanism that helps to account for the opinions and behaviors of Leave voters in the 2016 UK referendum who in seeking the authoritarian values of order and conformity desired to reduce immigration and “take back control” of policymaking.

Keywords

globalization backlash public opinion political economy economic policy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adler

Ansell

(2019). Housing and populism (pp. 1-22). West European Politics.

Adorno

T. W.

Frenkel-Brunswik

Levinson

D. J.

Stanford

N. R.

(1950). The authoritarian personality. Harper.

Altemeyer

(1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. University of Manitoba Press.

Autor

D. H.

Dorn

Hanson

G. H.

(2013). The China syndrome: Local labor market effects of import competition in the United States. American Economic Review, 103(6), 2121-2168.

Autor

Dorn

Hanson

Majlesi

(2016). Importing political polarization? The electoral consequences of rising trade exposure. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.

Berkowitz

(1989). Frustration-aggression hypothesis: Examination and reformulation. Psychological Bulletin, 106(1), 59-73.

Carreras

Y. I.

Bowler

(2019). Long-term economic distress, cultural backlash, and support for brexit. Comparative Political Studies, 0010414019830714.

Colantone

Stanig

(2018a). Global competition and Brexit. American Political Science Review, 112(2), 201-218.

Colantone

Stanig

(2018b). The trade origins of economic nationalism: Import competition and voting behavior in Western Europe. American Journal of Political Science, 62(4), 936-953.

10.

Dippel

Gold

Heblich

(2015). Globalization and its (dis-) content: Trade shocks and voting behavior. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.

11.

Dollard

Miller

N. E.

Doob

L. W.

Mowrer

O. H.

Sears

R. R.

(1939). Frustration and aggression. Yale University Press.

12.

Doty

R. M.

Peterson

B. E.

Winter

D. G.

(1991). Threat and authoritarianism in the United States, 1978-1987. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(4), 629-640.

13.

Duckitt

Bizumic

Krauss

S. W.

Heled

(2010). A tripartite approach to right-wing authoritarianism: The authoritarianism-conservatism-traditionalism model. Political Psychology, 31(5), 685-715.

14.

Duckitt

Fisher

(2003). The impact of social threat on worldview and ideological attitudes. Political Psychology, 24(1), 199-222.

15.

Dunwoody

P. T.

Funke

(2016). The aggression-submission-conventionalism scale: Testing a new three factor measure of authoritarianism. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 4(2), 571-600.

16.

Feigenbaum

J. J.

Hall

A. B.

(2015). How legislators respond to localized economic shocks: Evidence from Chinese import competition. The Journal of Politics, 77(4), 1012-1030.

17.

Feldman

(2003). Enforcing social conformity: A theory of authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 24(1), 41-74.

18.

Fromm

(1941). Escape from freedom. Farrar & Rinehart.

19.

Gidron

Hall

P. A

(2017). The politics of social status: Economic and cultural roots of the populist right. The British Journal of Sociology, 68(Suppl 1), S57.

20.

Hays

Lim

Spoon

J.-J.

(2019). The path from trade to right-wing populism in Europe. Electoral Studies, 60, 102038.

21.

Hetherington

Suhay

(2011). Authoritarianism, threat, and Americans’ support for the war on terror. American Journal of Political Science, 55(3), 546-560.

22.

Hetherington

M. J.

Weiler

J. D.

(2009). Authoritarianism and polarization in American politics. Cambridge University Press.

23.

Iversen

Soskice

(2018). Transition to a knowledge economy and the rise of populism: A human capital perspective. Technical report, Harvard University Working Paper.

24.

Jedinger

Burger

A. M.

(2020). The ideological foundations of economic protectionism: Authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and the moderating role of political involvement. Political Psychology, 41(2), 403-424.

25.

Jensen

J. B.

Quinn

D. P.

Weymouth

(2017). Winners and losers in international trade: The effects on US presidential voting. International Organization, 71(3), 423-457.

26.

Johnston

C. D.

(2013). Dispositional sources of economic protectionism. Public Opinion Quarterly, 77(2), 574-585.

27.

Kim

S. E.

Pelc

(2021). The politics of trade adjustment vs. trade protection. Comparative Political Studies, 54(13), 2354–2381.

28.

Lane

R. E.

(1962). Political ideology: Why the American common man believes what he does. Free Press of Glencoe.

29.

Lavine

Lodge

Freitas

(2005). Threat, authoritarianism, and selective exposure to information. Political Psychology, 26(2), 219-244.

30.

Lipset

S. M.

(1959). Political man: The social bases of politics. Vakils, Feffer and Simons Private.

31.

Lubbers

Scheepers

(2000). Individual and contextual characteristics of the German extreme Right-Wing vote in the 1990s. A test of complementary theories. European Journal of Political Research, 38(1), 63-94.

32.

Mansfield

Milner

Rudra

(2021). The backlash against globalization: Introduction. Comparative Political Studies, 24, 421-442.

33.

Margalit

(2019). Political responses to economic shocks. Annual Review of Political Science, 22(1), null.).

34.

Milner

(2021). Voting for populism in Europe: Globalization, technological change, and the extreme right. Comparative Political Studies, 54(13), 2286–2320.

35.

Norris

Inglehart

(2019). Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism. Cambridge University Press.

36.

O’Rourke

K. H.

(2019). Economic history and contemporary challenges to globalization. The Journal of Economic History, 81(2), 1-27.

37.

Owen

Walter

(2017). Open economy politics and Brexit: Insights, puzzles, and ways forward. Review of international political economy, 24(2), 179-202.

38.

Perrin

A. J.

(2005). National threat and political culture: Authoritarianism, antiauthoritarianism, and the September 11 attacks. Political Psychology, 26(2), 167-194.

39.

Pettigrew

T. F.

(2016). In pursuit of three theories: Authoritarianism, relative deprivation, and intergroup contact. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 1-21.

40.

Pierce

J. R.

Schott

P. K.

(2016). Trade liberalization and mortality: Evidence from US counties. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.

41.

Richey

(2012). Campaign advertising and the stimulation and activation of the authoritarian personality. Political Communication, 29(1), 24-43.

42.

Rodrik

(2017). Populism and the economics of globalization. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.

43.

Rokeach

(1960). The open and closed mind: Investigations into the nature of belief systems and personality systems. Martino Fine Books.

44.

Sales

S. M.

(1973). Threat as a factor in authoritarianism: An analysis of archival data. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28(1), 44-57.

45.

Scheve

K. F.

Slaughter

M. J.

(2001). What determines individual trade-policy preferences? Journal of International Economics, 54(2), 267-292.

46.

Sniderman

P. M.

Peri

de Figueiredo

R. J.

Jr (2002). The outsider: Prejudice and politics in Italy. Princeton University Press.

47.

Stenner

(2005). The authoritarian dynamic. Cambridge University Press.

48.

Walter

(2021). Contagious disintegration? How Brexit reverberates in other countries. Comparative Political Studies.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

2.53 MB