A frequent question in discussions about democracy is whether input from the public is ever considered and to what extent by politicians. This influence of public opinion on the realm of welfare policies has not been extensively explored, and most analyses are less precise for being conducted before the passage of the national welfare reform in 1996, better known as the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA). Bringing the analysis to a period after the reform to account for contextual changes since its passage, this study uses the multilevel and poststratification (MRP) model considered superior in analysis of subnational opinion using national survey data to assess the influence of public opinion on welfare policies at the state level. Collecting data from the 2014 CCES and a new developed welfare generosity index, I find that public opinion does not have any influence on how generous welfare programs turn out in their states, unless it is interacted with state government ideology. It seems that the ideology of the state government and the state poverty rate are the major determinants on welfare policies outcomes in the states, although the latter had different effects for TANF and SNAP.
BarrilleauxC.BerkmanM. (2003). Do governors matter? Budgeting rules and the politics of state policymaking. Political Research Quarterly, 56(4), 409–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290305600403
BerryD.RingquistJ.FordingC.HansonL. (1998). Measuring citizen and government ideology in the American States, 1960–93. American Journal of Political Science, 42(1), 327–348. https://doi.org/10.2307/2991759
4.
BolzendahlC.BrooksC. (2007). Women’s political representation and welfare state spending in 12 capitalist democracies. Social Forces, 85(4), 1509–1534. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2007.0061
5.
BroockmanD.E.SkrovronC. (2018). Bias in perceptions of public opinion among political elites. American Political Science Review, 112(3), 542–563.
6.
BruchS. K.MeyersM. K.GornickJ. C. (2018). The consequences of decentralization: Inequality in safety net provision in the post–welfare reform era. Social Service Review, 92(1), 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1086/696132
7.
BursteinP. (2003). The impact of public opinion on public policy: A review and an agenda. Political Research Quarterly, 56(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290305600103
8.
BursteinP. (2014). American public opinion, advocacy, and policy in congress: What the public wants and what it gets. Cambridge University Press.
9.
BursteinP. (2020). The determinants of public policy: What matters and how much. Policy Studies Journal, 48(1), 87–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12243
10.
CampbellC.GaddisS. M. (2017). “I don’t agree with giving cash’: A survey experiment examining support for public assistance”. Links to an external site. Social Science Quarterly, 98(5), 1352–1373. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12338
11.
CaugheyD.WarshawC. (2022). Dynamic democracy: Public opinion, elections, and policymaking in the American States. University of Chicago Press.
DomhoffG. W. (2002). The power elite, public policy, and public opinion. In Navigating public opinion: Polls, policy, and the future of American democracy, (pp. 124–137). Oxford University Press.
14.
EdwardsM.HeflinC.MueserP.PorterS.WeberB. (2016). The great recession and SNAP caseloads: A tale of two states. Journal of Poverty, 20(3), 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/10875549.2015.1094770
15.
EllisC.FaricyC. (2020). Race, “Deservingness,” and social spending attitudes: The role of policy delivery mechanism. Political Behavior, 42(3), 819–843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-09521-w
16.
EriksonRobert S.MacKuenMichaelStimsonJames A. (2002). The Macro Polity. Cambridge University Press.
17.
EriksonR. S.WrightG. C.WrightG. C.McIverJ. P. (1993). Statehouse democracy: Public opinion and policy in the American states. Cambridge University Press.
18.
FoxA.FengW.MeierB.KimY.ScruggsL.ZeitlinJ. (2020). Constructing an index of state safety net generosity, 1996–2010: Approach, state rankings and predictive validity.
19.
FrankoW. W.WitkoC. (2017). The new economic populism: How states respond to economic inequality. Oxford University Press.
20.
GilensM. (1999). Why Americans hate welfare: Race, media, and the politics of welfare. University of Chicago Press.
21.
GilensM.PageB. I. (2014). Testing theories of American politics: Elites, interest groups, and average citizens. Perspectives on Politics, 12(3), 564–581. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592714001595
22.
GrayV.LoweryD.FellowesM.McAteeA. (2004). Public opinion, public policy, and organized interests in the American states. Political Research Quarterly, 57(3), 411–420. https://doi.org/10.2307/3219851
23.
GrumbachJ. (2022). Laboratories against democracy: How national parties transformed state politics (Vol. 184). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691218472
24.
HerbstS. (2002). How state-level policy managers “read” public opinion. In ManzaJ.CookF. L.PageB. (red.), Navigating public opinion: Polls, policy, and the future of American democracy (pp. 171–183). Oxford University Press.
25.
HibbsD. A. (1977). Political parties and macroeconomic policy. American Political Science Review, 71(4), 1467–1487.
26.
IcelandJ. (2013). Poverty in America: A handbook (3rd ed.). University of California Press.
27.
JacobsL. R.ShapiroR. Y. (2000). Politicians don't pander: Political manipulation and the loss of democratic responsiveness. University of Chicago Press.
28.
LaxJ. R.PhillipsJ. H. (2009). Gay rights in the states: Public opinion and policy responsiveness. American Political Science Review, 103(3), 367–386. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055409990050
ManzaJ.CookF. L. (2002). A democratic polity? Three views of policy responsiveness to public opinion in the United States. American Politics Research, 30(6), 630–667. https://doi.org/10.1177/153267302237231
MichenerJ. (2018). Fragmented democracy: Medicaid, federalism, and unequal politics. Cambridge University Press.
33.
MichenerJ.BrowerM. T. (2020). What's policy got to do with it? Race, gender & economic inequality in the United States. Dædalus, 149(1), 100–118. https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_01776
34.
PageB. I.ShapiroR. Y. (1983). Effects of public opinion on policy. American Political Science Review, 77(1), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.2307/1956018
35.
QiH.HaselswerdtJ. (2024). Ideology, information, and social welfare preferences. American Politics Research, 52(1), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x231206151
36.
ReeseE.RamirezE.Estrada-CorreaV. (2013). The politics of welfare inclusion: Explaining state variation in legal immigrants' welfare rights. Sociological Perspectives, 56(1), 97–130. https://doi.org/10.1525/sop.2012.56.1.97
37.
SanoY.GaraskyS.GrederK. A.CookC. C.BrowderD. E. (2011). Understanding food insecurity among Latino immigrant families in rural America. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 32(1), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-010-9219-y
38.
SchneiderS. K.JacobyW. G. (2005a). Citizen influences on state policy priorities: The interplay of public opinion and interest groups. In Public opinion in state politics (pp. 183–208). Stanford University Press.
39.
SchneiderS. K.JacobyW. G. (2005b). Elite discourse and American public opinion: The case of welfare spending. Political Research Quarterly, 58(3), 367–379. https://doi.org/10.2307/3595608
40.
SharpE. B. (1999). The sometime connection: Public opinion and social policy. SUNY Press.
SimonovitsG.BorA. (2023). Stability and change in the opinion–policy relationship: Evidence from minimum wage laws. Research & Politics, 10(3), Article 20531680231188262. https://doi.org/10.1177/20531680231188262
43.
SossJ.FordingR. C.SchramS. F. (2011). Disciplining the poor: Neoliberal paternalism and the persistent power of race. University of Chicago Press.
44.
SquireP. (2017). A Squire index update. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 17(4), 361–371.
45.
TelesS. M. (1996). Whose welfare? AFDC and elite politics. Studies in Government & Public.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
