We show how symbolic politics condition public opinion on federal spending and how this helps to explain an important puzzle in contemporary American politics. Using multilevel regression and poststratification to estimate state-level opinion on federal spending, we show that, curiously, opposition to federal spending is higher in states receiving more federal money, per tax dollar paid. Belying the popular narrative surrounding so-called “red state socialism,” we find that simple hypocrisy does not explain this paradox—individuals who are likely to benefit from spending tend to support it. But, income is a more powerful predictor of opinion on spending in “taker” states than “giver” states, heightening state-level opposition in the former. There is also more to the story than economic self-interest. Symbolic racism is four times more powerful than income in explaining opposition to spending, and there are more people with such attitudes in states receiving more federal money.
ArceneauxK.NicholsonS. P. (2012). Who wants to have a Tea Party? The who, what, and why of the Tea Party movement. Political Science & Politics, 45, 700-710.
BarretoM. A.CooperB. L.GonzalezB.ParkerC. S.TowlerC. (2011). The Tea Party in the age of Obama: Mainstream conservatism or out-group anxiety. Political Power and Social Theory, 22, 105-237.
7.
BirdsallW. C. (1965). Essays in fiscal federalism. In MusgraveR. A. (Ed.), Essays in fiscal federalism (pp. 235-294). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
BoboL. (1983). Whites’ opposition to busing: Symbolic racism or realistic group conflict?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1196-1210.
10.
BraderT.ValentinoN. A.SuhayE. (2008). What triggers public opposition to immigration? Anxiety, group cues, and immigration threat. American Journal of Political Science, 52, 959-978.
11.
ButticeM. K.HightonB. (2013). How does multilevel regression and poststratification perform with conventional national surveys?Political Analysis, 21, 449-467.
12.
CitrinJ. (1979). Do people want something for nothing: Public opinion on taxes and government spending. National Tax Journal, 32, 113-129.
13.
DownsA. (1960). Why the government budget is too small in a democracy. World Politics, 12, 541-563.
14.
EdsallT.EdsallM. (2001). Chain reaction: The impact of race, rights, and taxes on American politics. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
15.
EismeierT. J. (1982). Public preferences about government spending: Partisan, social, and attitudinal sources of policy differences. Political Behavior, 4, 133-145.
16.
ElmendorfC. S.SpencerD. M. (2014). The geography of racial stereotyping: Evidence and implications for VRA preclearance after Shelby County. California Law Review, 102, 1123-1180.
17.
FranciaP.LevineR. (2006). Feast or famine at the federal luau? Understanding net federal spending under Bush. The Forum, 4
18.
GelmanA.HillJ. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19.
GelmanA.LittleT. C. (1997). Poststratification into many categories using hierarchical logistic regression. Survey Methodology, 23, 127-135.
20.
GelmanA.MaleckiM.LeeD.SuY.-S. (2014). Multilevel regression and poststratification: An R package. Retrieved from https://github.com/malecki/mrp
21.
GelmanA.ParkD.ShorB.CortinaJ. (2008). Red state, blue state, rich state, poor state: Why Americans vote the way they do. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
HurwitzJ.PeffleyM. (1998). Introduction. In HurwitzJ.PeffleyM. (Eds.), Perception and prejudice: Race and politics in the United States (pp. 1-16). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
26.
HurwitzJ.PeffleyM. (2005). Playing the race card in the post-Willie Horton era: The impact of racialized code words on support for punitive crime policy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 69, 99-112.
27.
JacobyW. G. (1994). Public attitudes toward government spending. American Journal of Political Science, 38, 336-361.
28.
JacobyW. G. (2000). Issue framing and public opinion on government spending. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 750-767.
29.
LacyD. (2009, August13). Why do red states vote Republican while blue states pay the bills? Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Toronto, ON, Canada.
30.
LacyD. (2014). Moochers and makers in the voting booth: Who benefits from federal spending and how did they vote in the 2012 presidential election?Public Opinion Quarterly, 78, 255-275.
31.
LaxJ.PhillipsJ. (2009). How should we estimate public opinion in the states?American Journal of Political Science, 53, 107-121.
32.
LaxJ.PhillipsJ. (2013, April). How should we estimate sub-national opinion using MRP? Preliminary findings and recommendations (Working paper). Retrieved from http://www.columbia.edu/~jrl2124/mrp2.pdf
MuellerE. (1963). Public attitudes toward fiscal programs. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 77, 210-235.
37.
ParkD.GelmanA.BafumiJ. (2004). Bayesian multilevel estimation with poststratification: State-level estimates from national polls. Political Analysis, 12, 375-385.
38.
SandersA. (1988). Rationality, self interest, and public attitudes on public spending. Social Science Quarterly, 69, 311-324.
39.
SearsD. O.CitrinJ. (1982). Tax revolt: Something for nothing in California. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40.
SearsD. O.HenryP. (2005). Over thirty years later: A contemporary look at symbolic racism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 95-150.
41.
SearsD. O.HenslerC. P.SpeerL. K. (1979). Whites’ opposition to “busing”: Self-interest or symbolic politics?American Political Science Review, 73, 369-384.
42.
SnidermanP.TetlockP. E. (1986). Symbolic racism: Problems of motive attribution in political debate. Journal of Social Issues, 42, 129-150.
43.
TeslerM. (2012). The spillover of racialization into health care: How President Obama polarized public opinion by racial attitudes and race. American Journal of Political Science, 56, 690-704.
44.
WarshawC.RoddenJ. (2012). How should we measure district-level public opinion on individual issues?The Journal of Politics, 74, 203-219.
45.
WilliamsonV.SkocpolT.CogginJ. (2011). The Tea Party and the remaking of republican conservatism. Perspectives on Politics, 9, 25-43.
46.
WinterN. J. (2006). Beyond welfare: Framing and the racialization of White opinion on social security. American Journal of Political Science, 96, 75-90.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
