How do perceptions of local immigrant populations influence immigration policy views? Building on findings that Americans may not accurately perceive population dynamics, we argue that objective measures do not fully capture the effects of local context on public opinion. Our research uses novel subjective experimental reminders about current levels of and recent changes in local immigrant populations to explore how these perceptions impact immigration policy views. In a survey experiment, we asked 2,400 Americans to consider current levels of or recent changes in their local immigrant population. Asking subjects to consider current levels of local immigrant populations modestly increases support for pro-immigrant policies, with particularly strong effects among non-White and Republicans. These effects may be driven by positive perceptions of immigrants and have implications for understanding the role of local community frames in shaping public opinion about immigration, particularly for groups who do not typically support permissive immigration policies.
AbrajanoM.HajnalZ. L. (2015). White backlash: Immigration, race, and American politics. Princeton University Press.
2.
AbrajanoM. A.HajnalZ.HassellH. J. G. (2017). Media framing and partisan identity: The case of immigration coverage and white macropartisanship. Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics, 2(1), 5–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/rep.2016.25
3.
AlamilloR.HaynesC.MadridR.Jr. (2019). Framing and immigration through the trump era. Sociology Compass, 13(5), Article e12676. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12676
4.
AlbaR.RumbautR. G.MarotzK. (2005). A distorted nation: Perceptions of racial/ethnic group sizes and attitudes toward immigrants and other minorities. Social Forces, 84(2), 901–919. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2006.0002
5.
AllportG. W. ([1954] 1988). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley.
BaybeckB.McClurgS. D. (2005). What do they know and how do they know it? An examination of citizen awareness of context. American Politics Research, 33(4), 492–520. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X04270934
8.
BenoitK.WatanabeK.WangH.NultyP.ObengA.MüllerS., et al (2018). quanteda: An R package for the quantitative analysis of textual data. Journal of Open Source Software, 3(30), 774. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00774
9.
CampbellA. L.WongC.CitrinJ. (2006). “Racial threat”, partisan climate, and direct democracy: Contextual effects in three California initiatives. Political Behavior, 28(2), 129–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-006-9005-6
10.
CasellasJ. P.LealD. L. (2013). Partisanship or population? House and senate immigration votes in the 109th and 110th congresses. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 1(1), 48–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2012.758588
11.
ChoW. K. T.BaerN. (2011). Environmental determinants of racial attitudes redux: The critical decisions related to operationalizing context. American Politics Research, 39(2), 414–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X10377167
12.
ChristO.SchmidK.LolliotS.SwartH.StolleD.TauschN.RamiahA. A.WagnerU.VertovecS.HewstoneM. (2014). Contextual effect of positive intergroup contact on outgroup prejudice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(11), 3996–4000. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1320901111
13.
CoultonC. J.KorbinJ.ChanT.SuM. (2001). Mapping residents’ perceptions of neighborhood boundaries: A methodological note. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29(2), 371–383. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010303419034
DyckJ. J.Pearson-MerkowitzS. (2014). To know you is not necessarily to love you: The partisan mediators of intergroup contact. Political Behavior, 36(3), 553–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-013-9240-6
16.
EnosR. D. (2014). Causal effect of intergroup contact on exclusionary attitudes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(10), 3699–3704. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1404262111
17.
EnosR. D. (2016). What the demolition of public housing teaches us about the impact of racial threat on political behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 60(1), 123–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12156
18.
EnosR. D. (2017). The space between us: Social geography and politics. Cambridge University Press.
19.
FarrisE. M.Silber MohamedH. (2018). Picturing immigration: How the media criminalizes immigrants. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 6(4), 814–824. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2018.1484375
20.
GainesB. J.KuklinskiJ. H.QuirkP. J. (2007). The logic of the survey experiment reexamined. Political Analysis, 15(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpl008
21.
GilesM. W.HertzK. (1994). Racial threat and partisan identification. The American Political Science Review, 88(2), 317–326. https://doi.org/10.2307/2944706
22.
GlasfordD. E.CalcagnoJ. (2012). The conflict of harmony: Intergroup contact, commonality and political solidarity between minority groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 323–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.001
23.
GoldsteinH.HealyM. J. R. (1995). The graphical presentation of a collection of means. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 158(1), 175–177.
24.
HaS. E. (2010). The consequences of multiracial contexts on public attitudes toward immigration. Political Research Quarterly, 63(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912908325255
25.
HawleyG. (2011). Political threat and immigration: Party identification, demographic context, and immigration policy preference*. Social Science Quarterly, 92(2), 404–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2011.00775.x
26.
HaynesC.MerollaJ.RamakrishnanS. K. (2016). Framing immigrants: News coverage, public opinion, and policy. Russell Sage Foundation.
27.
HeroR. (1998). Faces of inequality: Social diversity in American politics. Oxford University Press.
28.
HewstoneM.SwartH. (2011). Fifty-odd years of inter-group contact: From hypothesis to integrated theory. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(3), 374–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02047.x
29.
HoodM. V.MorrisI. L. (1997). ¿Amigo o enemigo? Context, attitudes, and anglo public opinion toward immigration. Social Science Quarterly, 78(2), 309–323.
30.
HopkinsD. J. (2010). Politicized places: Explaining where and when immigrants provoke local opposition. The American Political Science Review, 104(1), 40–60. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055409990360
31.
HopkinsD. J.SidesJ.CitrinJ. (2019). The muted consequences of correct information about immigration. The Journal of Politics, 81(1), 315–320. https://doi.org/10.1086/699914
32.
KeyV. O. (1949). Southern politics: In state and nation. Vintage Books.
33.
KnollB. R.RedlawskD. P.SanbornH. (2011). Framing labels and immigration policy attitudes in the Iowa caucuses: “Trying to out-tancredo tancredo. Political Behavior, 33(3), 433–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9141-x
34.
MacdonaldD. (2021). Political trust and support for immigration in the American mass public. British Journal of Political Science, 51(4), 1402–1420. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123419000668
35.
MangumM. (2019). Revisiting economic threat and cultural concerns: Public opinion toward immigration and non-citizens by race. Social Science Research, 83, 102309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2019.05.002.
36.
MasonL. (2016). A cross-cutting calm: How social sorting drives affective polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1), 351–377. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw001
37.
MasuokaN.JunnJ. (2013). The politics of belonging: Race, public opinion, and immigration. University of Chicago Press.
38.
McCartyN.PooleK. T.RosenthalH. (2016). Polarized America second edition: The dance of ideology and unequal riches. MIT Press.
39.
MerollaJ.RamakrishnanS. K.HaynesC. (2013). “Illegal,” “undocumented,” or “unauthorized”: Equivalency frames, issue frames, and public opinion on immigration. Perspectives on Politics, 11(3), 789–807. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592713002077
40.
NadeauR.NiemiR. G.LevineJ. (1993). Innumeracy about minority populations. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 57(3), 332–347. https://doi.org/10.1086/269379
41.
NeimanM.JohnsonM.BowlerS. (2006). Partisanship and views about immigration in Southern California: Just how partisan is the issue of immigration?International Migration, 44(2), 35–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2435.2006.00363.x
42.
NewmanB. J. (2013). Acculturating contexts and anglo opposition to immigration in the United States. American Journal of Political Science, 57(2), 374–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00632.x
43.
NewmanB. J.VelezY. (2014). Group size versus change? Assessing Americans’ perception of local immigration. Political Research Quarterly, 67(2), 293–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912913517303
44.
NewmanB. J.VelezY.HartmanT. K.BankertA. (2015). Are citizens “receiving the treatment”? Assessing a key link in contextual theories of public opinion and political behavior. Political Psychology, 36(1), 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12069
NtetaT. M.RiceD. (2021). Driving a Wedge? Republicans, immigration, and the impact of substantive appeals on african American vote choice. Political Research Quarterly, 74(1), 228–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912919900012
47.
OliverJ. E.WongJ. (2003). Intergroup prejudice in multiethnic Settings. American Journal of Political Science, 47(4), 567–582. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5907.00040
48.
OskooiiK. A. R.DreierS. K.CollingwoodL. (2018). Partisan attitudes toward sanctuary cities: The asymmetrical effects of political knowledge. Politics & Policy, 46(6), 951–984. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12278
Pearson-MerkowitzS.FilindraA.DyckJ. J. (2016). When partisans and minorities interact: Interpersonal contact, partisanship, and public opinion preferences on immigration policy. Social Science Quarterly, 97(2), 311–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12175
51.
PettigrewT. F. (1997). Generalized intergroup contact effects on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(2), 173–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297232006
ReichG.MendozaA. A. (2008). ‘Educating kids’ versus ‘coddling criminals’: Framing the debate over in-state tuition for undocumented students in Kansas. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 8(2), 177–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/153244000800800204
54.
RenyT. T.CollingwoodL.ValenzuelaA. A. (2019). Vote switching in the 2016 election: How racial and immigration attitudes, not economics, explain shifts in white voting. Public Opinion Quarterly, 83(1), 91–113. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfz011
55.
RochaR. R.LongoriaT.WrinkleR. D.KnollB. R.PolinardJ. L.WenzelJ. (2011). Ethnic context and immigration policy preferences among latinos and anglos*. Social Science Quarterly, 92(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2011.00754.x
56.
SchmidK.Al RamiahA.HewstoneM. (2014). Neighborhood ethnic diversity and trust: The role of intergroup contact and perceived threat. Psychological Science, 25(3), 665–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613508956
57.
SteinR. M.PostS. S.RindenA. L. (2000). Reconciling context and contact effects on racial attitudes. Political Research Quarterly, 53(2), 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290005300204
58.
Swire-ThompsonB.EckerU. K. H.LewandowskyS.BerinskyA. J. (2020). They might be a liar but they’re my liar: Source evaluation and the prevalence of misinformation. Political Psychology, 41(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12586
59.
TauschN.HewstoneM.KenworthyJ. B.PsaltisC.SchmidK.PopanJ. R.CairnsE.HughesJ. (2010). Secondary transfer effects of intergroup contact: Alternative accounts and underlying processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(2), 282–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018553
60.
TaylorM. C. (1998). How white attitudes vary with the racial composition of local populations: Numbers count. American Sociological Review, 63(4), 512–535. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657265
61.
TichenorD. J. (2009). Dividing lines: The politics of immigration control in America. Princeton University Press.
62.
TransueJ. E.LeeD. J.AldrichJ. H. (2009). Treatment spillover effects across survey experiments. Political Analysis, 17(2), 143–161. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpn012
63.
VelezY. R.WongG. (2017). Assessing contextual measurement Strategies. The Journal of Politics, 79(3), 1084–1089. https://doi.org/10.1086/691281
64.
WongC. (2007). “Little” and “big” pictures in our heads: Race, local context, and innumeracy about racial groups in the United States. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71(3), 392–412. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfm023
65.
WongC.BowersJ.WilliamsT.SimmonsK. D. (2012). Bringing the person back in: Boundaries, perceptions, and the measurement of racial context. The Journal of Politics, 74(4), 1153–1170. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381612000552
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
