The public face of interest group lobbying on immigration: Who responds to and who ignores what they say

Abstract

A main avenue for influencing public policy available to unions and business is public opinion campaigning. As groups with substantial credibility in the minds of the public, unions and employers have the potential to move immigration attitudes and, thereby, have a long-term indirect influence on immigration policy. The article asks, first, who is (not) convinced by arguments from business or labour leaders and second, what messages are most convincing. We present the results of a survey experiment in three very different immigration regimes and interest group environments (Canada, the UK and Germany). The results suggest that the net effects of public arguments are small, but vary widely across demographic groups.

Keywords

Business immigration public opinion survey experiments trade unions

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Achen

C.H.

(2002) ‘Parental Socialization and Rational Party Identification’, Political Behavior 24(2): 151–70.

Afonso

Negash

Wolff

(2020) ‘Closure or Equality: Trade Union Strategies Towards Labour Migration’, Journal of European Social Policy. This issue.

Alt

J.E.

Lassen

D.D.

Marshall

(2016) ‘Credible Sources and Sophisticated Voters: When Does New Information Induce Economic Voting?’, The Journal of Politics 78(2): 327–42.

Bachrach

Baratz

M.S.

(1962) ‘Two Faces of Power’, The American Political Science Review 56(4): 947–52.

Becher

Stegmueller

(2019) Cognitive Ability, Union Membership, and Voter Turnout, available at: http://publications.ut-capitole.fr/31472/1/becher_stegmueller_wp2019.pdf

Beyers

(2008) ‘Policy Issues, Organisational Format and the Political Strategies of Interest Organisations’, West European Politics 31(6): 1188–211.

Binstock

R.H.

George

L.K.

Cutler

S.J.

Hendricks

Schulz

J.H.

(2011) Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences. London: Elsevier.

Boräng

Kalm

Lindvall

(2020) ‘Unions and Immigration Policy in the Long Run’, Journal of European Social Policy. This issue.

Borwein

Donnelly

M.J.

(2019) ‘Fiscal Burdens and Knowledge of Selection Criteria in Canada’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 1–20.

10.

Chong

Druckman

J.N.

(2007) ‘Framing Public Opinion in Competitive Democracies’, American Political Science Review 101(4): 637–55.

11.

Converse

P.E.

(2006) ‘The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics (1964)’, Critical Review 18(1–3): 1–74.

12.

Crawford

(2018) ‘Theresa May’s post-Brexit Immigration Plans – a Disaster for Every Worker’, available at: https://www.tuc.org.uk/blogs/theresa-mays-post-brexit-immigration-plans-disaster-every-worker

13.

Culpepper

Regan

(2014) ‘Why don’t Governments Need Trade Unions Anymore? The Death of Social Pacts in Ireland and Italy’, Socio-Economic Review 12(2): 723–45.

14.

Daum

(2013) ‘Integration als Aufgabe der Wirtschaft’, available at: www.arbeitgeber.ch/arbeitsmarkt/integration-als-aufgabe-der-wirtschaft/

15.

Donnelly

M.J.

(n.d.) Group Interests, Individual Attitudes: How Group Memberships Shape Attitudes Toward the Welfare State. Toronto: Unpublished manuscript.

16.

Donnelly

M.J.

(2016) ‘Competition and Solidarity: Union Members and Immigration in Europe’, West European Politics 39(4): 688–709.

17.

Druckman

J.N.

Lupia

(2016) ‘Preference Change in Competitive Political Environments’, Annual Review of Political Science 19: 13–31.

18.

Druckman

J.N.

Peterson

Slothuus

(2013) ‘How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation’, American Political Science Review 107(1): 57–79.

19.

Dür

(2019) ‘How Interest Groups Influence Public Opinion: Arguments Matter More Than the Sources’, European Journal of Political Research 58(2): 514–35.

20.

Dür

Mateo

(2014) ‘Public Opinion and Interest Group Influence: How Citizen Groups Derailed the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement’, Journal of European Public Policy 21(8): 1199–217.

21.

Emmenegger

Marx

(2019) ‘The Politics of Inequality as Organised Spectacle: Why the Swiss do not Want to Tax the Rich’, New Political Economy 24(1): 103–24.

22.

Grillo

(2015) ‘Attentat auf “Charlie Hebdo” ist Anschlag auf unsere Werte’, available at: https://bdi.eu/artikel/news/attentat-auf-charlie-hebdo-ist-anschlag-auf-unsere-werte/

23.

Hainmueller

Hopkins

D.J.

(2014) ‘Public Attitudes Toward Immigration’, Annual Review of Political Science 17: 1–25.

24.

Hall

P.A.

Soskice

(2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. New York: Oxford University Press.

25.

Helbling

Kriesi

(2014) ‘Why Citizens Prefer High- Over Low-Skilled Immigrants. Labor Market Competition, Welfare State, and Deservingness’, European Sociological Review 30(5): 595–14.

26.

Hooghe

Marks

2005. ‘Calculation, Community and Cues: Public Opinion on European Integration’, European Union Politics 6(4): 419–43.

27.

Hopkins

D.J.

(2010) ‘Politicized Places: Explaining Where and When Immigrants Provoke Local Opposition’, American Political Science Review 104(1): 40–60.

28.

Inglehart

(1981) ‘Post-materialism in an Environment of Insecurity’, American Political Science Review 75(4): 880–900.

29.

Kim

S.E.

Margalit

(2017) ‘Informed Preferences? The Impact of Unions on Workers’ Policy Views’, American Journal of Political Science 61(3): 728–43.

30.

Knotz

Fossati

Scalise

Hooijer

(2020) ‘Immigration and the Welfare State: The Role of Capital and Labor’, Journal of European Social Policy. This issue.

31.

Korpi

(2006) ‘Power Resources and Employer-Centered Approaches in Explanations of Welfare States and Varieties of Capitalism: Protagonists, Consenters, and Antagonists’, World Politics 58(2): 167–206.

32.

Lupia

(1994) ‘Shortcuts Versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections’, American Political Science Review 88(1): 63–76.

33.

Luskin

R.C.

(1990) ‘Explaining Political Sophistication’, Political Behavior 12(4): 331–61.

34.

McGuire

(1969) ‘The Nature of Attitudes and Attitude Change’, in Lindzey

Aronson

(eds) Handbook of Social Psychology, 2nd edn. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

35.

McLaren

L.M.

(2001) ‘Immigration and the New Politics of Inclusion and Exclusion in the European Union: The Effect of Elites and the EU on Individual-Level Opinions Regarding European and non-European Immigrants’, European Journal of Political Research 39(1): 81–108.

36.

Mills

C.W.

(2000) The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press.

37.

Mosimann

Pontusson

(2017) ‘Solidaristic Unionism and Support for Redistribution in Contemporary Europe’, World Politics 69(3): 448–92.

38.

Murali

(2017) Caste, Class, and Capital: The Social and Political Origins of Economic Policy in India. New York: Cambridge University Press.

39.

O’Grady

Fairbairn

(2019) CBI & TUC call on Prime Minister to Change Brexit Approach. London: Confederation of Business and Industry.

40.

Page

B.I.

Shapiro

R.Y.

Dempsey

G.R.

(1987) ‘What moves public opinion?’, American Political Science Review 81(1): 23–44.

41.

Penninx

Roosblad

(2000) Trade Unions, Immigration, and Immigrants in Europe 1960–1993. New York: Berghahn Books.

42.

Pontusson

Rueda

(2010) ‘The Politics of Inequality: Voter Mobilization and Left Parties in Advanced Industrial States’, Comparative Political Studies 20(10): 1–31.

43.

Rueda

Pontusson

(2000) ‘Wage Inequalities and Varieties of Capitalism’, World Politics 52(3): 350–83.

44.

Slothuus

(2010) ‘When can Political Parties Lead Public Opinion? Evidence from a Natural Experiment’, Political Communication 27(2): 158–77.

45.

Smith

(2018) ‘New Report Calls for Raising Canada’s Immigration Rate’, available at: www.cicnews.com/2018/05/new-report-calls-for-raising-canadaimmigration-rate-0510650.html

46.

Taylor

S.E.

Fiske

S.T.

(1978) ‘Salience, Attention, and Attribution: Top of the Head Phenomena’, in Berkowitz

(ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 11, pp. 249–88. London: Elsevier.

47.

TNS Political and Social. (2013) How Companies Influence Our Society: Citizens’ View. Technical Report. April. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate-General Enterprise and Industry.

48.

Watts

J.R.

(2002) Immigration Policy and the Challenge of Globalization: Unions and Employers in Unlikely Alliance. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

49.

Weber

Dunaway

Johnson

(2012) ‘It’s all in the Name: Source Cue Ambiguity and the Persuasive Appeal of Campaign Ads’, Political Behavior 34(3): 561–84.

50.

Zaller

(1992) The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.

51.

Zellman

G.L.

(1975) ‘Antidemocratic Beliefs: A Survey and Some Explanations’, Journal of Social Issues 31(2): 31–53.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.16 MB