Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Throughout American history some members of Congress are beset with the unfortunate predicament of facing a fellow incumbent in their bids for reelection. One culprit is responsible for these atypical contests: redistricting. Using district and sub-district level data, this research note provides the first systematic coverage of all dueling incumbent general election U.S. House races from 1843 to 2018. We chronicle and analyze when we expect to see dueling incumbent races, the ability of parties to target out-party incumbents, and the electoral value of previously represented constituents for incumbents in reconfigured districts. Although incumbent duels are uncommon, they comprise a substantial number of incumbent general election defeats in contests following redistricting.

Keywords

house elections dueling incumbents redistricting electoral retrenchment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bullock

C. S.

III . (1975). Redistricting and congressional stability, 1962-72. Journal of Politics, 37(2), 569–575. https://doi.org/10.1017/s002238160004130x

Bullock

C. S.

III. (2010). Redistricting: The most political activity in America. Rowman & Littlefield.

Cain

B. E.

(1985). Assessing the partisan effects of redistricting. American Political Science Review, 79(2), 320–333. https://doi.org/10.2307/1956652

Cox

G. W.

Katz

J. N.

(2002). Elbridge gerry’s salamander: The electoral consequences of the reapportionment revolution. Cambridge University Press.

Curiel

J. A.

Steelman

(2018). Redistricting out representation: Democratic harms in splitting zip codes. Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, 17(4), 328–353. https://doi.org/10.1089/elj.2018.0528

Desposato

S. W.

Petrocik

J. R.

(2003). The variable incumbency advantage: New voters, redistricting, and the personal vote. American Journal of Political Science, 47(1), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5907.00002

Engstrom

E. J.

(2013). Partisan gerrymandering and the construction of American democracy. University of Michigan Press.

Goedert

(2017). The pseudoparadox of partisan mapmaking and congressional competition. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 17(1), 47–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532440016659234

Hetherington

M. J.

Larson

B. A.

Globetti

(2003). The redistricting cycle and strategic candidate decisions in U.S. House races. Journal of Politics, 65(4), 1221–1235. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.t01-1-00134

10.

Jacobson

G. C.

(2015). It’s nothing personal: The decline of the incumbency advantage in U.S. House elections. Journal of Politics, 77(3), 861–873. https://doi.org/10.1086/681670

11.

Jacobson

G. C.

Kernell

(1983). Strategy and choice in congressional elections. Yale University Press.

12.

Maisel

L. S.

(1982). From obscurity to oblivion: Running in the congressional primary. University of Tennessee Press.

13.

McKee

S. C.

Teigen

J. M.

Turgeon

(2006). The partisan impact of congressional redistricting: The case of Texas, 2001-2003. Social Science Quarterly, 87(2), 308–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.2006.00382.x

14.

Petrocik

J. R.

Desposato

S. W.

(2004). Incumbency and short-term influences on voters. Political Research Quarterly, 57(3), 363–373. https://doi.org/10.2307/3219847

15.

Rush

M. E.

(2000). Redistricting and partisan fluidity: Do we really know a gerrymander when we see one? Political Geography, 19(2), 249–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0962-6298(99)00048-7

16.

Sides

Shaw

Grossmann

Lipsitz

(2022). Campaigns and elections: Rules, reality, strategy, choice. W. W. Norton and Company.

Dueling Incumbent House Elections,1843-2018

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References