Redistricting is the causal agent responsible for two incumbents facing off in U.S. House elections and hence, despite the rarity of these matchups, they occur periodically due to district boundary changes. In this article, we examine who wins a recent and highly competitive incumbent duel: the 2024 GOP primary in Alabama’s congressional district (CD) 1. Our assessment of this race marks the first academic study to marshal large-N survey data for the purpose of gauging voter preferences in a dueling incumbent primary. This approach gives us a clearer understanding of what accounts for the outcome of a highly contentious and extremely close election. Our findings suggest the incumbency advantage was overridden by voter alignment with the MAGA wing of the Republican Party, which produced a narrow victory for the more MAGA/Trump-positioned candidate in this race.
AshtonH. B.CrespinM. H.McKeeS. C. (2022). Dueling incumbent House elections, 1843–2018. American Politics Research, 50(6), 735–742. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x221116618
2.
AshtonH. B.CrespinM. H.McKeeS. C. (2023). Dueling incumbent primaries in U.S. House elections. Social Science Quarterly, 104(2), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13253
3.
CainB. E. (1984). The reapportionment puzzle. University of California Press.
4.
CainB. E. (1985). Assessing the partisan effects of redistricting. American Political Science Review, 79(2), 320–333. https://doi.org/10.2307/1956652
5.
CohenM.KarolD.NoelH.ZallerJ. (2008). The party decides: Presidential nominations before and after reform. University of Chicago Press.
6.
CohenR.CookC. (2021). The almanac of American politics: 2022. National Journal.
HoodM. V.III.McKeeS. C. (2010). Stranger danger: Redistricting, incumbent recognition, and vote choice. Social Science Quarterly, 91(2), 344–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2010.00696.x
14.
HoodM. V.III.McKeeS. C. (2022). The hardest path to reelection: Dueling incumbent House primaries in 2022. The Forum, 20(3–4), 409–433. https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2022-2062
15.
HoodM. V.III.McKeeS. C. (2023). How much is a Trump endorsement worth?State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 23(4), 380–395. https://doi.org/10.1017/spq.2023.12
16.
HopkinsD. J. (2018). The increasingly United States: How and why American political behavior nationalized. University of Chicago Press.
17.
JacobsonG. C. (2015). It’s nothing personal: The decline of the incumbency advantage in U.S. House elections. The Journal of Politics, 77(3), 861–873. https://doi.org/10.1086/681670
18.
JacobsonG. C. (2021). The presidential and congressional elections of 2020: A national referendum on the Trump presidency. Political Science Quarterly, 136(1), 11–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/polq.13133
19.
JacobsonG. C.CarsonJ. L. (2023). The politics of congressional elections. Rowman & Littlefield.
McKeeS. C. (2008). Redistricting and familiarity with U.S. House candidates. American Politics Research, 36(6), 962–979. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x08322881
22.
McKeeS. C. (2010). Republican ascendancy in southern U.S. House elections. Routledge.
23.
McKeeS. C.ShawD. R. (2005). Redistricting in Texas: Institutionalizing Republican ascendancy. In GalderisiP. F. (Ed.), Redistricting in the new millennium (pp. 275–311). Lexington Books.
24.
McKeeS. C.ShinoE.SmithD. A. (2022). Redrawn, withdrawn: Effects of redistricting on the representative-constituent relationship. Election Law Journal, 21(4), 280–295. https://doi.org/10.1089/elj.2022.0027
25.
McKeeS. C.TeigenJ. M.TurgeonM. (2006). The partisan impact of congressional redistricting: The case of Texas, 2001–2003. Social Science Quarterly, 87(2), 308–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.2006.00382.x
RabinowitzG.MacdonaldS. E. (1989). A directional theory of issue voting. American Political Science Review, 83(1), 93–121. https://doi.org/10.2307/1956436
28.
RushM. E. (2000). Redistricting and partisan fluidity: Do we really know a gerrymander when we see one?Political Geography, 19(2), 249–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0962-6298(99)00048-7
SidesJ.ShawD.GrossmannM.LipsitzK. (2023). Campaigns and elections: Rules, reality, strategy, choice. W. W. Norton & Company.
31.
SidesJ.TeslerM.VavreckL. (2018). Identity crisis: The 2016 presidential campaign and the battle for the meaning of America. Princeton University Press.
YoshinakaA.MurphyC. (2011). The paradox of redistricting: How partisan mapmakers foster competition but disrupt representation. Political Research Quarterly, 64(2), 435–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912909355716
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
