Although numerous studies have assessed the influence of the 1990s redistricting on U.S. House elections, without exception, these published studies rely on aggregate data (e.g., district-level data). Likewise, the author uses aggregate data, but he also departs from previous studies by using survey data to assess the influence of redistricting on vote choice in the 1992 and 1994 U.S. House elections. Unlike past studies, with the use of survey data, the author makes more definitive statements regarding the effects of redistricting on vote choice. The 1990s redistricting was an important factor contributing to the Republicans' House majority because voters drawn into districts with a different incumbent standing for reelection were much more likely to vote Republican.
Abramowitz, Alan I.1995. The end of the Democratic era? 1994 and the future of congressional election research. Political Research Quarterly48:873-89.
2.
Abramson, Paul R., John H. Aldrich, and David W. Rohde .1994. Change and continuity in the 1992 elections. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
3.
———. 2003. Change and continuity in the 2000 and 2002 elections . Washington, DC: CQ Press.
4.
Ansolabehere, Stephen, James M. Snyder Jr., and Charles Stewart III.2000. Old voters, new voters, and the personal vote: Using redistricting to measure the incumbency advantage. American Journal of Political Science44 (1): 17-34.
5.
Balz, Dan, and Ronald Brownstein.1996. Storming the gates: Protest politics and the Republican revival. Boston: Little, Brown.
6.
Banducci, Susan A., and Jeffrey A. Karp .1994. The electoral consequences of scandal and reapportionment in the 1992 House elections. American Politics Quarterly22 (1): 3-26.
7.
Barone, Michael, and Grant Ujifusa.1993. The almanac of American politics 1994. Washington, DC: National Journal.
8.
———. 1995. The almanac of American politics 1996. Washington, DC: National Journal.
9.
Black, Earl, and Merle Black.2002. The rise of southern Republicans. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
Bolce, Louis, Gerald De Maio, and Douglas Muzzio.1996. Dial-in democracy: Talk radio and the 1994 election. Political Science Quarterly111 (3): 457-81.
11.
Brambor, Thomas, William R. Clark, and Matthew Golder.2006. Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. PoliticalAnalysis14 (1): 63-82.
12.
Butler, David, and Bruce Cain.1992. Congressional redistricting: Comparative and theoretical perspectives. New York: Macmillan .
13.
Cain, Bruce E.1984. The reapportionment puzzle. Berkeley : University of California Press.
14.
Cain, Bruce E., John A. Ferejohn, and Morris P. Fiorina .1987. The personal vote: Constituency service and electoral independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
Cain, Bruce E., Karin MacDonald, and Michael McDonald .2005. From equality to fairness: The path of political reform since Baker v. Carr. In Party lines: Competition, partisanship, and congressional redistricting, ed. Thomas E. Mann and Bruce E. Cain, 6-30. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
16.
Cameron, Charles, David Epstein, and Sharon O'Halloran .1996. Do majority-minority districts maximize substantive black representation in Congress?American Political Science Review90 (4): 794-812.
17.
Campbell, Colin, and Bert A. Rockman, eds. 1996. The Clinton presidency: First appraisals. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
18.
Cox, Gary W., and Jonathan N. Katz .2002. Elbridge Gerry's salamander: The electoral consequences of the reapportionment revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Cunningham, Maurice T.2001. Maximization, whatever the cost: Race, redistricting and theDepartment of Justice. Westport, CT: Praeger.
20.
Desposato, Scott W., and John R. Petrocik .2003. The variable incumbency advantage: New voters, redistricting, and the personal vote. American Journal of Political Science47 (1): 18-32.
21.
Dimock, Michael A., and Gary C. Jacobson .1995. Checks and choices: The House Bank Scandal's impact on voters in 1992. Journal of Politics57:1143-59.
22.
Engstrom, Erik J.2006. Stacking the states, stacking the House: The partisan consequences of congressional redistricting in the 19th century. American Political Science Review100 (3): 419-27.
23.
Epstein, David, and Sharyn O'Halloran .1999. A social science approach to race, redistricting, and representation. American Political Science Review93:187-91.
24.
———. 2000. Majority-minority districts and the new politics of congressional elections. In Continuity and change in House elections, ed. David W. Brady, John F. Cogan, and Morris P. Fiorina, 87-109. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
25.
Erikson, Robert S., and Gerald C. Wright .2005. Voters, candidates, and issues in congressional elections. In Congress reconsidered , 8th ed., ed. Lawrence C. Dodd and Bruce I. Oppenheimer , 77-106. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
26.
Gaddie, Ronald Keith, and Charles S. Bullock III.2000. Elections to open seats in the U.S. House: Where the action is. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
27.
Gelman, Andrew, and Gary King.1994. Enhancing democracy through legislative redistricting. American Political Science Review88 (3): 541-59.
28.
Gimpel, James G.1996. Legislating the revolution: The Contract with America in its first 100 days. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
29.
Grofman, Bernard, ed. 1998. Race and redistricting in the 1990s. New York: Agathon.
30.
Hetherington, Marc J., Bruce A. Larson, and Suzanne Globbeti .2003. The redistricting cycle and strategic candidate decisions in U.S. House races. Journal of Politics65:1221-35.
31.
Hill, Kevin A.1995. Does the creation of majority black districts aid Republicans? An analysis of the 1992 congressional elections in eight southern states. Journal of Politics57 (2): 384-401.
32.
Hill, Kevin A., and Nicol C. Rae .2000. What happened to the Democrats in the South? US House elections, 1992-1996. Party Politics6:5-22.
33.
Hood, M.V., III, and Seth C. McKee .Forthcoming. Gerrymandering on Georgia's mind: The effects of redistricting on vote choice in the 2006 midterm. Social Science Quarterly.
34.
Jacobson, Gary C.1990. The electoral origins of divided government: Competition in U.S. House elections, 1946-1988. Boulder, CO: Westview.
35.
———. 1996. The 1994 House elections in perspective. Political Science Quarterly111:203-23.
36.
———. 2000. Reversal of fortune: The transformation of U.S. House elections in the 1990s. In Continuity and change in House elections , ed. David W. Brady, John F. Cogan, and Morris P. Fiorina, 10-38. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
37.
———. 2004. The politics of congressional elections. New York: Pearson Education.
38.
Jacobson, Gary C., and Samuel Kernell.1983. Strategy and choice in congressional elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
39.
Lyons, Michael, and Peter F. Galderisi .1995. Incumbency, reapportionment, and U.S. House redistricting. Political Research Quarterly48 (4): 857-71.
40.
Mayhew, David R.1974. Congress: The electoral connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
41.
McKee, Seth C., and Daron R. Shaw .2005. Redistricting in Texas: Institutionalizing Republican ascendancy. In Redistricting in the new millennium , ed. Peter F. Galderisi , 275-312. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
42.
McKee, Seth C., Jeremy M. Teigen, and Mathieu Turgeon .2006. The partisan impact of congressional redistricting: The case of Texas, 2001-2003. Social Science Quarterly87 (2): 308-17.
43.
Nelson, Michael, ed. 1998. The presidency and the political system. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
44.
Niemi, Richard G., and Alan I. Abramowitz .1994. Partisan redistricting and the 1992 congressional elections. Journal of Politics56 (3): 811-17.
45.
Petrocik, John R., and Scott W. Desposato .1998. The partisan consequences of majority-minority redistricting in the South, 1992 and 1994. Journal of Politics60 (3): 613-33.
46.
———. 2004. Incumbency and short-term influences on voters . Political Research Quarterly57 (3): 363-73.
47.
Rae, Nicol C.1998. Conservative reformers: The Republican freshmen and the lessons of the 104th Congress. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
48.
Rush, Mark E.1992. The variability of partisanship and turnout: Implications for gerrymandering analysis and representation theory. American Politics Quarterly20 (1): 99-122.
49.
———. 1993. Does redistricting make a difference? Partisan representation and electoral behavior. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
50.
———. 2000. Redistricting and partisan fluidity: Do we really know a gerrymander when we see one? Political Geography19:249-60.
51.
Shotts, Kenneth W.2001. The effect of majority-minority mandates on partisan gerrymandering . American Journal of Political Science45 (1): 120-35.
52.
Stimson, James A.2004. Tides of consent: How public opinion shapes American politics . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53.
Swain, John W., Stephen A. Borrelli, and Brian C. Reed .1998. Partisan consequences of the post-1990 redistricting for the U.S. House of Representatives. Political Research Quarterly51 (4): 945-67.
54.
Tomz, Michael, Jason Wittenberg, and Gary King.2003. CLARIFY: Software for interpreting and presenting statistical results. Version 2.1. Stanford University , University of Wisconsin, and Harvard University. January 5. http://gking.harvard.edu/ .
55.
Voss, D. Stephen, and David Lublin.2001. Black incumbents, white districts: An appraisal of the 1996 congressional elections. American Politics Research29 (March): 141-82.
