Leading up to the 2020 election, many Americans were worried about casting a ballot in-person due to the Covid-19 pandemic and supported measures to protect voters at the voting booths. Addressing these concerns, election administrators enacted multiple Covid safety measures (e.g., routinely cleaning voting booths, wearing face masks, and providing single use ballot pens). Given voters’ health concerns related to the pandemic and support for safety measures at the ballot box, the presence of Covid safety protocols may increase how safe voters feel voting in-person and evaluations of their voting experience. Using the 2020 Survey of the Performance of American Elections, this study finds that the presence of Covid safety measures increased feelings of voting safety, evaluations of poll workers, and the positivity of the voting experience, but typically not polling place evaluations; though, effects differ by Covid safety policy.
AlvarezM. R.HallT. E. (2006). Controlling democracy: the principal–agent problems in election administration. Policy Studies Journal, 34(4), 491–510.
2.
AtkesonL. R.BryantL. A.HallT. E.SaundersK.AlvarezM. (2010). A new barrier to participation: Heterogeneous application of voter identification policies. Electoral Studies, 29(1), 66–73, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2009.08.001
3.
AtkesonL. R.KerevelY. P.AlvarezR. M.HallT. E. (2014). Who asks for voter identification? Explaining poll-worker discretion. The Journal of Politics, 76(4), 944–957, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381614000528
4.
BowlerS.DonovanT. (2016). A partisan model of electoral reform: Voter identification laws and confidence in state elections. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 16(3), 340–361, https://doi.org/10.1177/1532440015624102
ClaassenR. L.MaglebyD. B.MonsonJ. Q.PattersonK. D. (2008). “At your service: Voter evaluations &of poll worker performance.” American Politics Research, 36(4), 612–634, https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x08319006
7.
ClaassenR. L.MaglebyD. B.MonsonJ. Q.PattersonK. D. (2013). “Voter confidence and the election-day voting experience”. Political Behavior, 35(2), 215–235, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-012-9202-4
8.
CollJ. (2022). “Waiting to vote safely: How Covid-19 safety measures shaped in-person voter wait times during the 2020 election.” Social Science Quarterly, 103(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13124
9.
CottiC.EngelhardtB.FosterJ.NessonE.NiekampP. (2021). “The relationship between in-person voting and COVID-19: Evidence from the Wisconsin primary.” Contemporary Economic Policy, 39(4), 760–777, https://doi.org/10.1111/coep.12519
10.
CurielJ. A.ClarkJ. T. (2021). Disparities in poll closures in the age of COVID-19: A case study of Wisconsin. Election Law Journal, 20(4), 345–363. https://doi.org/10.1089/elj.2020.0669
11.
DouglasJ. A.MZilis. (2020). “Bring the masks and sanitizer: The surprising bipartisan consensus about safety measures for in-person voting during the coronavirus pandemic.” Available at SSRN 3693286.
GarrettR. S.SJEckmanKLShanton, 2020. “Congressional research service report R46455: COVID-19 and other election emergencies: Frequently asked questions and recent policy developments.” Congressional Research Service. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R46455
HallT.MonsonJ. Q.PattersonK. D. (2007). “Poll workers and the vitality of democracy: An early assessment.” PS: Political Science and Politics, 40(4), 647–654, https://doi.org/10.1017/s104909650707103x
16.
HallT. E.StewartC.,III (2013). “Voter attitudes toward poll workers in the 2012 election.” Available at SSRN 2245353.
17.
HeckmanJ. J. (1976). “The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models.” Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 5(4), 475–492.
18.
JannB. (2014). Plotting regression coefficients and other estimates. The Stata Journal14(4): 708–737.
19.
KaiserS. V.WatsonA.DoganB.KarmurA.WarrenK.WangP.Camano SosaM.OlarteA.DorseyS.SuM.BrownL.SachdevD.BardachN. S. (2021). “Preventing COVID-19 transmission in education settings.” Pediatrics, 148(3): 1–9, https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2021-051438
KingB. A. (2017). Policy and precinct: Citizen evaluations and electoral confidence. Social Science Quarterly, 98(2), 672–689, https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12303
22.
KingB. A.BarnesA. (2019). Descriptive representation in election administration: Poll workers and voter confidence. Election Law Journal, 18(1), 16–30, https://doi.org/10.1089/elj.2018.0485
23.
KortumP.SteinR.AcemyanC. Z.WallachD. S.VannE. (2020). How human factors can help preserve democracy in the age of pandemics. Human Factors, 62(7), 1077–1086, https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720820946896
24.
KousserT.HillS.LockhartM.MerollaJ. L.RomeroM. (2021). How do Americans want elections to be run during the COVID-19 crisis?Research and Politics, 8(2), 20531680211012228, https://doi.org/10.1177/20531680211012228
25.
LambM. (2021). Who Leaves the Line, Anyway? A Study of Who Leaves Polling Place Lines, and Why. Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, 20(3), 301–314.
26.
PettigrewS. (2021). The downstream consequences of long waits: How lines at the precinct depress future turnout. Electoral studies, 71(1), 102188, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102188
SaundersG. H.VisramA. S. (2021). Impacts of face coverings on communication: an indirect impact of COVID-19. International Journal of Audiology, 60(7), 495–506.
30.
SteinR. M.MannC.StewartC.IIIBirenbaumZ.FungA.GreenbergJ.KawsarF.AlberdaG.AlvarezR. M.AtkesonL.BeaulieuE.BirkheadN. A.BoehmkeF. J.BostonJ.BurdenB. C.CantuF.CobbR.DarmofalD.EllingtonT. C.WronskiJ. (2020). Waiting to vote in the 2016 presidential election: Evidence from a multi-county study. Political Research Quarterly, 73(2), 439–453, https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912919832374
SteinR. M.VonnahmeG.ByrneM.WallachD. (2008). Voting technology, election administration, and voter performance. Election Law Journal, 7(2), 123–135, https://doi.org/10.1089/elj.2008.7203
33.
StewartC. (2021), “2020 Survey of the performance of American elections,” https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/FSGX7Z, Harvard Dataverse, V1, UNF:6:70KW4uouuTDT860MiPJq3A== [fileUNF]
34.
Suttmann-LeaM. (2020). Poll worker decision making at the American ballot box: Part of special symposium on election sciences. American Politics Research, 48(6), 714–718, https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x20920266
35.
TaylorS.AsmundsonG. J. G. (2021) “Negative attitudes about facemasks during the COVID-19 pandemic: The dual importance of perceived ineffectiveness and psychological reactance.” PLoS ONE. 16(2): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246317
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
