This article addresses the question of appearance-based effects by looking at the U.S. House of Representatives election 2016. We broaden the focus beyond existing studies by offering a comprehensive and systematic analysis of the three traits attractiveness, competence, and likability while simultaneously taking into account confounding third variables and possible interactions. Corresponding to the comparative character of electoral competition in the districts, we developed a relative measure of the three traits which we apply in an online survey. This measure also takes into account the raters’ latency times, that is, their clicking speed, as a weighting factor for their ambiguity in the ratings. With these data we test whether appearance matters for the electoral outcome. We find that attractiveness positively affects the vote share, whereas perceived likability and competence play no role. The study also tests to what extent the found appearance effects are conditioned by incumbency status, age, and gender of the contestants. Furthermore, it gives hints which aspects of their appearance candidates could change to perform better at the ballot box.
AbramowitzA. I.WebsterS. W. (2018). Negative partisanship: Why Americans dislike parties but behave like rabid partisans: Negative partisanship and rabid partisans. Political Psychology, 39, 119-135. doi:10.1111/pops.12479
2.
AmbadyN.RosenthalR. (1992). Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 256-274. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.111.2.256
ArmstrongJ. S.GreenK. C.JonesR. J.WrightM. J. (2010). Predicting elections from politicians’ faces. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 22, 511-522. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edq038
6.
AtkinsonM. D.EnosR. D.HillS. J. (2009). Candidate faces and election outcomes: Is the face-vote correlation caused by candidate selection. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 4, 229-249.
7.
BallewC. C.TodorovA. (2007). Predicting political elections from rapid and unreflective face judgments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 17948-17953. Retrieved from http://www.pnas.org/content/104/46/17948.short
BarM.NetaM.LinzH. (2006). Very first impressions. Emotion, 6, 269-278. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.6.2.269
10.
BarrettA. W.BarringtonL. W. (2005). Is a picture worth a thousand words? Newspaper photographs and voter evaluations of political candidates. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 10, 98-113. doi:10.1177/1081180X05281392
11.
BartelsL. M. (2018). Partisanship in the Trump era. The Journal of Politics, 80, 1483-1494. doi:10.1086/699337
12.
BassiliJ. N. (2000). Reflections on response latency measurement in telephone surveys. Political Psychology, 21, 1-6. doi:10.1111/0162-895X.00174
13.
BerggrenN.JordahlH.PoutvaaraP. (2010). The looks of a winner: Beauty and electoral success. Journal of Public Economics, 94(1-2), 8-15. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.11.002
14.
BishinB. G.StevensD.WilsonC. (2006). Character counts? Honesty and fairness in election 2000. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70, 235-248. doi:10.1093/poq/nfj016
15.
BullR.HawkesC. (1982). Judging politicians by their faces. Political Studies, 30, 95-101. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1982.tb00522.x
16.
CampbellA.ConverseP.MillerW.StokesD. (1960). The American voter. New York, NY: Wiley.
17.
DionK.BerscheidE.WalsterE. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 285-290. doi:10.1037/h0033731
18.
DunkakeI.KiechleT.KleinM.RosarU. (2012). Schöne Schüler, schöne Noten? Eine empirische Untersuchung zum Einfluss der physischen Attraktivität von Schülern auf die Notenvergabe durch das Lehrpersonal [Good looks, good grades? An empirical analysis of the influence of students’ physical attractiveness on grading by teachers]. Zeitschrift Für Soziologie, 41, 142-161.
19.
EfrainM. G.PattersonE. W. J. (1974). Voters vote beautiful: The effect of physical appearance on a national election. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 6, 352-356. doi:10.1037/h0081881
20.
EpsteinD.ZemskyP. (1995). Money talks: Deterring quality challengers in congressional elections. American Political Science Review, 89, 295-308. doi:10.2307/2082426
21.
EsserF.StrömbäckJ. (Eds.). (2014). Mediatization of politics: Understanding the transformation of Western democracies. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
22.
FunkC. L. (1999). Bringing the candidate into models of candidate evaluation. The Journal of Politics, 61, 700-720. doi:10.2307/2647824
HagenahJ.RosarU.KleinM. (2010). Physische Attraktivität und individuelles Leistungsverhalten. Oder: Warum und wann unattraktive Männer die besseren Fußballer sind [Physical attractiveness and individual performance. Or: Why and when unattractive men are the better soccer players]. Soziale Welt, 61(1), 51-68.
25.
HamermeshD. S.BiddleJ. E. (1994). Beauty and the labor market. The American Economic Review, 84, 1174-1194. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2117767
26.
HeilmanM. E.SaruwatariL. R. (1979). When beauty is beastly: The effects of appearance and sex on evaluations of job applicants for managerial and nonmanagerial jobs. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23, 360-372. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(79)90003-5
27.
HerrmannM.ShikanoS. (2015). Attractiveness and facial competence bias face-based inferences of candidate ideology. Political Psychology, 37, 401-417. doi:10.1111/pops.12256
28.
JacobsonG. C.CarsonJ. L. (2016). The politics of congressional elections (9th ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
29.
JäckleS.MetzT., (2016). Brille, Blazer Oder Bart? Das Aussehen Als Determinante Des Wahlerfolgs von Bundestags- Direktkandidaten [Glasses, Blazer or Beard? Physical Appearance as a Determinant of Electoral Success for German MPs]. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 57, 217-246. doi:10.5771/0032-3470-2016-2-217
30.
JäckleS.MetzT., (2017). Beauty Contest Revisited: The Effects of Perceived Attractiveness, Competence, and Likability on the Electoral Success of German MPs. Politics & Policy, 45, 495-534. doi:10.1111/polp.12209
31.
JohnsonS. K.PodratzK. E.DipboyeR. L.GibbonsE. (2010). Physical attractiveness biases in ratings of employment suitability: Tracking down the “beauty is beastly” effect. The Journal of Social Psychology, 150, 301-318. doi:10.1080/00224540903365414
KinderD. R. (1986). Presidential character revisited. In LauR. R.SearsD. O. (Eds.), Political cognition: The 19th annual Carnegie symposium on cognition (pp. 233-255). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
KleinM.RosarU. (2005). Physische Attraktivität und Wahlerfolg. Eine empirische Analyse am Beispiel der Wahlkreiskandidaten bei der Bundestagswahl 2002 [Physical attractiveness and electoral success. An empirical investigation on candidates in constituencies at the German federal election 2002]. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 46, 263-287. doi:10.1007/s11615-005-0249-2
36.
KriesiH. (2012). Personalization of national election campaigns. Party Politics, 18, 825-844. doi:10.1177/1354068810389643
37.
LangloisJ. H.KalakanisL.RubensteinA. J.LarsonA.HallamM.SmootM. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 390-423. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390
38.
LangloisJ. H.RitterJ. M.CaseyR. J.SawinD. B. (1995). Infant attractiveness predicts maternal behaviors and attitudes. Developmental Psychology, 31, 464-472. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.31.3.464
39.
LawsonC.LenzG. S.BakerA.MyersM. (2010). Looking like a winner: Candidate appearance and electoral success in new democracies. World Politics, 62, 561-593. doi:10.1017/S0043887110000195
40.
LittleA. C.ApicellaC. L.MarloweF. W. (2007). Preferences for symmetry in human faces in two cultures: Data from the UK and the Hadza, an isolated group of hunter-gatherers. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274, 3113-3117. doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.0895
41.
López BóoF.RossiM. A.UrzúaS. S. (2013). The labor market return to an attractive face: Evidence from a field experiment. Economics Letters, 118, 170-172. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2012.10.016
42.
LutzG. (2010). The electoral success of beauties and beasts. Swiss Political Science Review, 16, 457-480. doi:10.1002/j.1662-6370.2010.tb00437.x
MattesK.SpezioM.KimH.TodorovA.AdolphsR.AlvarezR. M. (2010). Predicting election outcomes from positive and negative trait assessments of candidate images. Political Psychology, 31, 41-58. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00745.x
45.
McAllisterI. (2007). The personalization of politics. In DaltonR. J.KlingemannH.-D. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political behavior (pp. 571-588). doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199270125.003.0030
46.
McAllisterI. (2016). Candidates and voting choice. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.73
47.
McDermottM. L. (2009a). Religious stereotyping and voter support for evangelical candidates. Political Research Quarterly, 62, 340-354. doi:10.1177/1065912908320668
48.
McDermottM. L. (2009b). Voting for myself: Candidate and voter group associations over time. Electoral Studies, 28, 606-614. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2009.05.025
49.
McLellanB.McKelvieS. J. (1993). Effects of age and gender on perceived facial attractiveness. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 25, 135-142. doi:10.1037/h0078790
OlivolaC. Y.SussmanA. B.TsetsosK.KangO. E.TodorovA. (2012). Republicans prefer republican-looking leaders: Political facial stereotypes predict candidate electoral success among right-leaning voters. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 605-613. doi:10.1177/1948550611432770
52.
OlivolaC. Y.TodorovA. (2010). Elected in 100 milliseconds: Appearance-based trait inferences and voting. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 34, 83-110. doi:10.1007/s10919-009-0082-1
53.
PatzerG. L. (1985). The physical attractiveness phenomena. doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-0202-6
54.
PrainoR.StockemerD.RatisJ. (2014). Looking good or looking competent? Physical appearance and electoral success in the 2008 congressional elections. American Politics Research, 42, 1096-1117. doi:10.1177/1532673X14532825
55.
PrysbyC. (2008). Perceptions of candidate character traits and the presidential vote in 2004. PS: Political Science & Politics, 41, 115-122. doi:10.1017/S1049096508080189
56.
RosarU. (2009). Fabulous front-runners. Eine empirische Untersuchung zur Bedeutung der physischen Attraktivität von Spitzenkandidaten für den Wahlerfolg ihrer Parteien [Fabulous front-runners. An empirical analysis of the importance of physical attractiveness of top candidates for parties’ electoral success]. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 50, 754-773. doi:10.1007/s11615-009-0155-0
57.
RosarU.KleinM. (2014). The physical attractiveness of front-runners and electoral success: An empirical analysis of the 2004 European Parliament elections. Zeitschrift Für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 8, 197-209. doi:10.1007/s12286-014-0206-9
58.
RosarU.KleinM.BeckersT. (2008). The frog pond beauty contest: Physical attractiveness and electoral success of the constituency candidates at the North Rhine-Westphalia state election of 2005. European Journal of Political Research, 47, 64-79. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2007.00720.x
59.
RosenbergS. W.BohanL.McCaffertyP.HarrisK. (1986). The image and the vote: The effect of candidate presentation on voter preference. American Journal of Political Science, 30, 108-127. doi:10.2307/2111296
60.
RuleN. O.AmbadyN.AdamsR. B.OzonoH.NakashimaS.YoshikawaS.WatabeM. (2010). Polling the face: Prediction and consensus across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 1-15. doi:10.1037/a0017673
61.
SearsD. O. (1969). Political behaviour. In LindzeyG.AronsonE. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 315-458). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
62.
SpezioM. L.LoeschL.GosselinF.MattesK.AlvarezR. M. (2012). Thin-slice decisions do not need faces to be predictive of election outcomes. Political Psychology, 33, 331-341. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00897.x
63.
StockemerD.PrainoR. (2015). Blinded by beauty? Physical attractiveness and candidate selection in the U.S. House of Representatives. Social Science Quarterly, 96, 430-443. doi:10.1111/ssqu.12155
64.
TodorovA.MandisodzaA. N.GorenA.HallC. C. (2005). Inferences of competence from faces predict election outcomes. Science, 308, 1623-1626. doi:10.1126/science.1110589
65.
TodorovA.SaidC. P.EngellA. D.OosterhofN. N. (2008). Understanding evaluation of faces on social dimensions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 455-460. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.10.001
66.
WattenbergM. P. (1990). The rise of candidate-centered politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
67.
ZebrowitzL. A.MontepareJ. M. (2008). Social psychological face perception: Why appearance matters. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1497-1517. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00109.x
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
