Does an individual’s gender help to explain if he or she is more or less likely to be recruited to run for political office? While the effects of sex differences on the candidate emergence process have been studied extensively, the influence of masculinity and femininity is less understood. To uncover if gender influences whether an individual is recruited to run for political office, this article relies on data from an original survey of a nationally representative sample of city council members, with the primary independent variable, individuals’ self-identified masculinity, measured by the Personal Attributes Questionnaire (PAQ). Results show that those who identify as more masculine, whether male or female, are more likely to be recruited to run for elected office. This effect holds for a variety of types of recruitment, such as political elites and women’s organizations. The findings add an important dimension to the supply-side explanations for women’s underrepresentation.
BanwartC. M.McKinneyM. S. (2005). A gendered influence in campaign debates? Analysis of mixed-gender United States Senate and gubernatorial debates. Communication Studies, 56, 353-373.
2.
Barbara Lee Family Foundation. (2004). Cracking the code: Political intelligence for women running for office. Available from barbaraleefoundation.org
3.
BauerN. M. (2015). Emotional, sensitive, and unfit for office? Gender stereotype activation and support female candidates. Political Psychology, 36, 691-708.
4.
BauerN. M. (2016). The effects of counterstereotypic gender strategies on candidate evaluations. Political Psychology, 38, 279-295.
BemS. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155-162.
7.
BemS. L. (1993). The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
8.
BurrellB. C. (1994). A woman’s place is in the house: Campaigning for Congress in the feminist era. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
9.
ButlerD. M.PreeceJ. R. (2016). Recruitment and perceptions of gender bias in party leader support. Political Research Quarterly, 69, 842-851.
10.
BystromD. G.BanwartM. C.KaidL. L.RobertsonT. A. (2004). Gender and candidate communication. New York, NY: Routledge.
11.
CarrollS. J. (1994). Women as candidates in American politics (2nd ed.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
12.
CarrollS. J.SanbonmatsuK. (2013). More women can run: Gender and pathways to the state legislatures. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
13.
ChoiN. (2004). A psychometric examination of the personal attributes questionnaire. The Journal of Social Psychology, 144, 348-352.
14.
ConroyM. (2015). Masculinity, media, and the American Presidency. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
15.
Crowder-MeyerM. (2013). Gendered recruitment without trying: How local party recruiters affect women’s representation. Politics & Gender, 9, 390-413.
16.
Crowder-MeyerM.LauderdaleB. (2014). A partisan gap in the supply of female potential candidates in the United States. Research & Politics, 1, 1-7.
17.
DarcyR.WelchS.ClarkJ. (1994). Women, elections, and representation. New York, NY: Longman.
18.
DeckmanM. (2016). Tea Party women: Mama grizzlies, grassroots leaders, and the changing face of the American right. New York: New York University Press.
19.
DillmanD. A.SmythJ. D.ChristianM. L. (2009). Internet, mail and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
20.
DittmarK. (2015a). Encouragement is not enough: Addressing social and structural barriers to female recruitment. Politics & Gender, 11, 759-765.
21.
DittmarK. (2015b). Navigating gendered terrain: Stereotypes and strategy in political campaigns. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
22.
Duerst-LahtiG.KellyR. M. (1995). On governance, leadership, and gender. In Duerst-LahtiG.KellyR. M. (Eds.), Gender, power, leadership, and governance (pp. 11-38). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
23.
EaglyA. H.KarauS. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573-598.
24.
EaglyA. H.WoodW. (2012). Social role theory. In Van LangeP. A. M.KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories in social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 458-476). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
25.
ElderL. (2012). The partisan gap among women state legislators. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 33, 65-85.
26.
FoxR. L.LawlessJ. L. (2010). It still takes a candidate: Why women don’t run for office. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
27.
FoxR. L.LawlessJ. L. (2014). Uncovering the origins of the gender gap in political ambition. American Political Science Review, 108, 499-519.
28.
FultonS. A.MaestasC. D.MaiselL. S.StoneW. J. (2006). The sense of a woman: Gender, ambition, and the decision to run for Congress. Political Research Quarterly, 59, 235-248.
29.
HelmreichR. L.SpenceJ. T.WilhelmJ. A. (1981). A psychometric analysis of the Personal Attributes Questionnaire. Sex Roles, 7, 1097-1108.
30.
HuddyL.TerkildsenN. (1993). The consequences of gender stereotypes for women candidates at different levels and types of office. Political Research Quarterly, 46, 503-525.
31.
KahnK. L.KenneyP. J. (2009). The role of gender stereotypes in U.S. Senate campaigns. Politics & Gender, 5, 301-324.
32.
KeenerE.StroughJ.DiDonatoL. (2012). Gender differences and similarities in strategies for managing conflict with friends and romantic partners. Sex Roles, 67, 83-97.
33.
KirkpatrickJ. J. (1974). Political woman. New York, NY: Basic Books.
34.
KoenigA. M.EaglyA. H.MitchellA. A.RistikariT. (2011). Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 616-642.
35.
KunovichS.PaxtonP. (2005). Pathways to power: The role of political parties in women’s national political representation. American Journal of Sociology, 111, 505-552.
36.
LawlessJ. L. (2004). Women, war, and winning elections: Gender stereotyping in the post-September 11th era. Political Research Quarterly, 57, 479-490.
37.
MoncriefG. F.SquireP.JewellM. E. (2001). Who runs for the legislature?Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
38.
NorrisP.LovenduskiJ. (1995). Political recruitment: Gender, race and class in the British Parliament. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
39.
PalmerB.SimonD. (2008). Breaking the political glass ceiling: Women and congressional elections. New York, NY: Routledge.
40.
PrinzT. S. (1993). The career paths of elected politicians: A review and prospectus. In WilliamsS.LasherE. L. (Eds.), Ambition and beyond: Career paths of American politicians (pp. 11-63). Berkeley, CA: Institute of Governmental Studies.
41.
RosenwasserS. M.DeanN. G. (1989). Gender role and political office: Effects of perceived masculinity/femininity of candidate and political office. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 77-85.
42.
SanbonmatsuK. (2002). Political parties and the recruitment of women to state legislatures. Journal of Politics, 64, 791-809.
43.
SanbonmatsuK. (2006). Where women run: Gender and party in the American states. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
44.
SanbonmatsuK.CarrollS. J.WalshD. (2009). Poised to run: Women’s pathways to the state legislatures. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for American Women and Politics.
45.
SanbonmatsuK.DolanK. A. (2009). Do gender stereotypes transcend party?Political Research Quarterly, 62, 485-494.
46.
SchlesingerJ. A. (1966). Ambition and politics. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
47.
SchneiderM. C.BosA. L. (2014). Measuring stereotypes of female politicians. Political Psychology, 35, 245-266.
48.
SchneiderM. C.HolmanM. R.DiekmanA. B.McAndrewT. (2016). Power, conflict, and community: How gendered views of political power influence women’s political ambition. Political Psychology, 37, 515-531.
49.
SpenceJ. T.HelmreichR.StappJ. (1975). Ratings of self and peers on sex role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 29-39.
50.
SpenceJ. T.HelmreichR. L. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates and antecedents. Austin: University of Texas Press.
51.
SpenceJ. T. (1993). Gender-related traits and gender ideology: Evidence or a multifactorial theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 624-635.
52.
SpenceJ. T.BucknerC. E. (2000). Instrumental and expressive traits, trait stereotypes, and sexist attitudes: What do they signify?Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 44-53.
53.
SvaraJ. H. (2003). Two decades of continuity and change in American city councils. Washington, DC: National League of Cities.
54.
TwengeJ. M. (1997). Changes in masculine and feminine traits over time: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 36, 305-325.
55.
VergeT. (2015). The gender regime of political parties: Feedback effects between supply and demand. Politics & Gender, 11, 754-759.
56.
VinnicombeS.SinghV. (2002). Sex role stereotyping and requisites of successful top managers. Management Review, 17, 120-130.
57.
WelchS. (1978). Recruitment of women to public office: A discriminant analysis. The Western Political Quarterly, 31, 372-380.
58.
WindettJ. (2014). Differing paths to the top: Gender, ambition, and running for Governor. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 35, 287-314.
59.
WoodW.EaglyA. H. (2009). Gender identity. In LearyM. R.HoyleR. H. (Eds.) Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 109-125). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
60.
WoodW.EaglyA. H. (2012). Biosocial construction of sex differences and similarities in behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 55-123.
61.
YoderJ. D.RiceR. W.AdamsJ.PriestR. F.PrinceH. T. (1982). Reliability of the Attitudes Toward Women Scale and the Personal Attributes Questionnaire. Sex Roles, 8, 651-657.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
