Public Mood,Previous Electoral Experience,and Responsiveness Among Federal Circuit Court Judges

Abstract

Whether public opinion influences federal judges is a question that has long motivated—but often eluded—scholars. In this article, we examine two related questions: First, whether federal circuit court judges respond to circuit-level public opinion and, second, whether judges with extensive past elected political experience are even more responsive. The data show that circuit judges indeed respond to public opinion. The results also suggest that judges with greater past elected political experience may be more responsive. The results have implications for democratic control of the unelected judiciary, and suggest that appointing judges with electoral experience could, for better or worse, lead to a more majoritarian judiciary.

Keywords

US Courts of Appeals public opinion electoral experience judicial decision making

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aliotta

J. M.

(1988). Social backgrounds, social motives and participation on the U.S. Supreme Court. Political Behavior, 10, 267-284.

Arnold

R. D.

(1990). The logic of congressional action. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Ashenfelter

Eisenberg

Schwab

S. J.

(1995). Politics and the judiciary: The influence of judicial background on case outcomes. The Journal of Legal Studies, 24, 257-281.

Bartels

(2008). Unequal democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Barton

B. H.

(2012). An empirical study of Supreme Court justice pre-appointment experience. Florida Law Review, 64, 1137-1187.

Baum

(2006). Judges and their audiences: A perspective on judicial behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Berry

W. D.

Ringquist

E. J.

Fording

R. C.

Hanson

R. L.

(1998). Measuring citizen and government ideology in the American states, 1960-1993. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 327-348.

Black

R. C.

Owens

R. J.

(2012). The solicitor general and the United States Supreme Court: Executive influence and judicial decisions. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Black

R. C.

Owens

R. J.

Wedeking

Wohlfarth

P. C.

(2016a). The influence of public sentiment on Supreme Court opinion clarity. Law & Society Review, 50, 703-732.

10.

Black

R. C.

Owens

R. J.

Wedeking

Wohlfarth

P. C.

(2016b). U.S. Supreme Court opinions and their audiences. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

11.

Bonneau

C. W.

Cann

D. M.

(2015). Voters’ verdicts: Citizens, campaigns, and institutions in state Supreme Court elections. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.

12.

Bonneau

C. W.

Hall

M. G.

(2009). In defense of judicial elections. New York, NY: Routledge.

13.

Boyd

C. L.

Epstein

Martin

A. D.

(2010). Untangling the causal effects of sex on judging. American Journal of Political Science, 54, 389-411.

14.

Brace

Arceneaux

Johnson

Ulbig

S. G.

(2004). Does state political ideology change over time? Political Research Quarterly, 57, 529-540.

15.

Brace

Arceneaux

Johnson

Ulbig

S. G.

(2007). Reply to “the measurement and stability of state citizen ideology.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 7, 133-140.

16.

Brace

Boyea

B. D.

(2008). State public opinion, the death penalty, and the practice of electing judges. American Journal of Political Science, 62, 360-372.

17.

Brudney

J. J.

Schiavoni

Merritt

D. J.

(1999). Judicial hostility toward labor unions—Applying the social background model to a celebrated concern. Ohio State Law Journal, 60, 1675-1771.

18.

Calvin

Collins

P. M.

Jr. Esbaugh-Soha

(2011). On the relationship between public opinion and decision making in the U.S. courts of appeals. Political Research Quarterly, 64, 736-748.

19.

Carsey

T. M.

Harden

J. J.

(2010). New measures of partisanship, ideology, and policy mood in the American states. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 10, 136-156.

20.

Casillas

C. J.

Enns

P. K.

Wohlfarth

P. C.

(2011). How public opinion constrains the U.S. Supreme Court. American Journal of Political Science, 55, 74-88.

21.

Clark

T. S.

(2009). The separation of powers, court-curbing and judicial legitimacy. American Journal of Political Science, 53, 971-989.

22.

Cross

F. B.

Tiller

E. H.

(1998). Judicial partisanship and obedience to legal doctrine: Whistleblowing on the federal courts of appeals. Yale Law Journal, 107, 2155-2176.

23.

Eisenberg

Johnson

S. L.

(1990). Effects of intent: Do we know how legal standards work. Cornell Law Review, 76, 1151-1197.

24.

Ellis

C. R.

Stimson

J. A.

(2012). Ideology in America. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

25.

Ellis

C. R.

Ura

J. D.

Ashley-Robinson

(2006). The dynamic consequences of nonvoting in American national elections. Political Research Quarterly, 59, 227-233.

26.

Enns

P. K.

(2014). The public’s increasing punitiveness and its influence on mass incarceration in the United States. American Journal of Political Science, 58, 857-872.

27.

Enns

P. K.

(2016). Incarceration nation: How the United States became the most punitive democracy in the world. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

28.

Enns

P. K.

Koch

(2013). Public opinion in the U.S. States: 1956 to 2010. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 13, 349-372.

29.

Enns

P. K.

Koch

(2015). State policy mood: The importance of over-time dynamics. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 15, 436-446.

30.

Enns

P. K.

Wohlfarth

P. C.

(2013). The swing justice. The Journal of Politics, 75, 1089-1107.

31.

Enns

P. K.

Wohlfarth

P. C.

(2017). Making sense of the Supreme Court-public opinion relationship. In Howard

R. M.

Randazzo

(Eds.), Handbook of judicial behavior. New York, NY: Routledge.

32.

Epstein

Gillman

Kritzer

H. M.

Spriggs

J. F.

II Lindquist

S. A.

Segal

J. A.

Speath

H. J.

(2003). Symposium: The Supreme Court and the attitudinal model revisited. Law and Courts, 13(3), 10-38.

33.

Epstein

Martin

A. D.

(2011). Does public opinion influence the Supreme Court? Possibly yes (but we’re not sure why). University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, 13, 263-281.

34.

Epstein

Martin

A. D.

Quinn

K. M.

Segal

J. A.

(2009). Circuit effects: How the norm of federal judicial experience biases the Supreme Court. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 157, 833-880.

35.

Epstein

Martin

A. D.

Segal

J. A.

Westerland

(2007). The judicial common space. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 23, 303-325.

36.

Erikson

R. S.

Mackuen

M. B.

Stimson

J. A.

(2002). The macro polity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

37.

Erikson

R. S.

Wright

G. C.

Mclver

J. P.

(2007). Measuring the public’s ideological preferences in the 50 states: Survey responses versus roll call data. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 7, 141-151.

38.

Fowler

L. L.

(1996). Who runs for congress? Political Science & Politics, 29, 430-434.

39.

Gerber

A. S.

Huber

G. A.

Doherty

Dowling

C. M.

Raso

S. E.

(2011). Personality traits and participation in political processes. The Journal of Politics, 73, 692-706.

40.

Gibson

J. L.

(2012). Electing judges: The surprising effects of campaigning on judicial legitimacy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

41.

Gibson

J. L.

Caldeira

G. A.

Spence

L. K.

(2003). Measuring attitudes toward the United States Supreme Court. American Journal of Political Science, 47, 354-367.

42.

Giles

M. W.

Blackstone

Vining

R. L.

(2008). The Supreme Court in American democracy: Unraveling the linkages between public opinion and judicial decision making. The Journal of Politics, 70, 293-306.

43.

Giles

M. W.

Hettinger

V. A.

Peppers

(2001). Picking federal judges: A note on policy and partisan selection agendas. Political Research Quarterly, 54, 623-641.

44.

Giles

M. W.

Walker

T. G.

(1975). Judicial policy-making and southern school segregation. The Journal of Politics, 37, 917-936.

45.

Ginsburg

R. B.

(2006). Advocating the elimination of gender-based discrimination: The 1970’s new look at the equality principle, address at the University of Cape Town, South Africa. Retrieved from http://www.supremecourt.gov/publicinfo/speeches/viewspeeches.aspx?Filename=sp\_02-10-06.html

46.

Goldman

(1966). Voting behavior on the United States Courts of appeals, 1961-1964. American Political Science Review, 60, 374-383.

47.

Goldman

(1975). Voting behavior on the United States Courts of appeals revisited. American Political Science Review, 69, 491-506.

48.

Gryski

G. S.

Main

E. C.

Dixon

W. J.

(1986). Models of state high court decision making in sex discrimination cases. The Journal of Politics, 48, 143-155.

49.

Hall

M. E. K.

Kirkland

Windett

J. H.

(2015). Holding steady on shifting sands: Countermajoritarian decision making in the U.S. Courts of appeals. Public Opinion Quarterly, 79, 504-523.

50.

Hall

M. G.

(1992). Electoral politics and strategic voting in state supreme courts. The Journal of Politics, 54, 427-446.

51.

Hooper

A. K.

(2005). Jurisdiction-stripping: The pledge protection act of 2004. Harvard Journal on Legislation, 42, 511-524.

52.

Key

V. O.

Jr. (1961). Public opinion and American democracy. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.

53.

Kim

P. T.

(2009). Deliberation and strategy on the United States Courts of appeals: An empirical exploration of panel effects. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 157, 1319-1381.

54.

McGuire

K. T.

Stimson

J. A.

(2004). The least dangerous branch revisited: New evidence on supreme court responsiveness to public preferences. The Journal of Politics, 66, 1018-1035.

55.

Merritt

D. J.

Brudney

J. J.

(2001). Stalking secret law: What predicts publication in the United States Courts of appeals. Vanderbilt Law Review, 54, 71-122.

56.

Murphy

W. F.

(1964). Elements of judicial strategy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

57.

Nicholson-Crotty

Peterson

D. A.

Ramirez

M. D.

(2009). Dynamic representation(s): Federal criminal justice policy and an alternative dimension of public mood. Political Behavior, 31, 629-655.

58.

Norrander

(2001). Measuring state public opinion with the senate national election study. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 1, 111-125.

59.

Peretti

T. L.

(2007). Where have all the politicians gone? Recruiting for the modern Supreme Court. Judicature, 91, 112-122.

60.

Posner

R. A.

(2008). How judges think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

61.

Rosen

(2001, June 3). A majority of one. The New York Times, Section 6: Column 1. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2001/06/03/magazine/a-majority-of-one.html)

62.

Schlesinger

(1966). Ambition and politics: Political careers in the United States. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

63.

Sisk

G. C.

Heise

Morris

A. P.

(1998). Charting the influences on the judicial mind: An empirical study of judicial reasoning. New York University Law Review, 73, 1377-1500.

64.

Stimson

J. A.

(1991). Public opinion in America: Moods, cycles, and swings. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

65.

Stimson

J. A.

(1999). Public opinion in America: Moods, cycles, and swings (2nd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

66.

Stimson

J. A.

Mackuen

M. B.

Erikson

R. S.

(1995). Dynamic representation. American Political Science Review, 89, 543-565.

67.

Tate

C. N.

(1981). Personal attribute models of the voting behavior of U.S. Supreme Court justices: Liberalism in civil liberties and economics decisions, 1946-1978. American Journal of Political Science, 75, 355-367.

68.

Ura

J. D.

Ellis

C. R.

(2008). Income, preferences, and the dynamics of policy responsiveness. PS: Political Science & Politics, 41, 785-794.

69.

Vines

(1964). Federal district judges and race relations cases in the south. The Journal of Politics, 26, 337-357.

70.

Wohlfarth

P. C.

(2009). The tenth justice? Consequences of politicization in the solicitor general’s office. The Journal of Politics, 70, 224-237.

71.

Zuk

Barrow

Gryski

(1996). Attributes of U.S. Federal Judges Database. Ann Arbor, MI: ICPSR 6796. Retrieved from http://artsandsciences.sc.edu/poli/juri/attributes.htm.