Does the Supreme Court care what the public thinks? For decades, published articles have consistently reported a significant, positive relationship between public opinion and Supreme Court output. However, these studies posit mutually contradictory theories and report irreconcilable results. We advance this literature in two ways. First, we show that the empirical “fact” driving the search for a workable theory is actually illusory. Second, we defend a theory of judicial independence. To be clear, we do not attempt to prove the Court does not respond to the public’s opinions on policy. We argue that there is little reason the Court should respond and demonstrate that, contrary to twenty-five years of scholarship, there is no good empirical evidence suggesting it does.
AchenChristopher H.2002. “Toward a New Political Methodology: Microfoundations and ART.” Annual Review of Political Science5 (1): 423–50.
2.
AchenChristopher H.2005. “Let’s Put Garbage-Can Regressions and Garbage-Can Probits Where They Belong.” Conflict Management and Peace Science22 (4): 327–39.
3.
BryanAmanda C.KromphardtChristopher D.2016. “Public Opinion, Public Support, and Counter-Attitudinal Voting on the U.S. Supreme Court.” Justice System Journal37 (4): 298–317.
4.
CasillasChristopherEnnsPeter K.WohlfarthPatrick C.2011. “How Public Opinion Constrains the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science55 (1): 74–88.
5.
ClarkTom S.LaxJeffrey R.RiceDouglas. 2015. “Measuring the Political Salience of Supreme Court Cases.” Journal of Law and Courts3 (1): 37–65.
6.
CollinsTodd A.CooperChristopher A.2016. “The Case Salience Index, Public Opinion, and Decision Making on the U.S. Supreme Court.” Justice System Journal37 (3): 232–45.
7.
DahlRobert A.1957. “Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker.” Journal of Public Law6:279–95.
8.
ElwertFelixWinshipChristopher. 2014. “Endogenous Selection Bias: The Problem of Conditioning on a Collider Variable.” Annual Review of Sociology40:31–53.
9.
EnnsPeter KWohlfarthPatrick C.2013. “The Swing Justice.” Journal of Politics75 (4): 1089–1107.
10.
EpsteinLeeKnightJack. 1997. The Choices Justices Make. SAGE.
11.
EpsteinLeeMartinAndrew D.2010. “Does Public Opinion Influence the Supreme Court? Possibly Yes (But We’re Not Sure Why).” University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law13 (2): 263–81.
12.
EpsteinLeeSegalJeffrey A.2000. “Measuring Issue Salience.” American Journal of Political Science44 (1): 66–83.
13.
FlemmingRoy B.WoodB. Dan. 1997. “The Public and the Supreme Court: Individual Justice Responsiveness to American Policy Moods.” American Journal of Political Science41 (2): 468–98.
14.
FranklinCharles H.KosakiLiane C.1989. “Republican Schoolmaster: The U.S. Supreme Court, Public Opinion, and Abortion.” American Political Science Review83 (3): 751–71.
15.
FriedmanBarry. 2009. The Will of the People: How Public Opinion Has Influenced the Supreme Court and Shaped the Meaning of the Constitution. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
16.
GilesMicheal W.BlackstoneBethanyViningRichard L.Jr.2008. “The Supreme Court in American Democracy: Unraveling the Linkages between Public Opinion and Judicial Decision Making.” Journal of Politics70 (2): 293–306.
17.
GlennonColinStrotherLogan. 2019. “The Maintenance of Institutional Legitimacy in Supreme Court Justices’ Public Rhetoric.” Journal of Law and Courts7 (2): 241–61.
18.
HainmuellerJensMummoloJonathanXuYiqing. 2019. “How Much Should We Trust Estimates from Multiplicative Interaction Models? Simple Tools to Improve Empirical Practice.” Political Analysis27 (2): 163–92.
19.
HallMatthew E. K.2014. “The Semiconstrained Court: Public Opinion, the Separation of Powers, and the U.S. Supreme Court’s Fear of Nonimplementation.” American Journal of Political Science58 (2): 352–66.
20.
HarveyAnnaFriedmanBarry. 2006. “Pulling Punches: Congressional Constraints on the Supreme Court’s Constitutional Rulings, 1987-2000.” Legislative Studies Quarterly31 (4): 533–62.
21.
LeeFrances E.2015. “How Party Polarization Affects Governance.” Annual Review of Political Science18:261–82.
22.
LenzGabrielSahnAlexander. 2019. “Achieving Statistical Significance with Covariates and without Transparency.” Working paper. https://osf.io/c2qvb/.
23.
LinkMichael W.1995. “Tracking Public Mood in the Supreme Court: Cross-Time Analyses of Criminal Procedure and Civil Rights Cases.” Political Research Quarterly48 (1): 61–78.
24.
McGuireKevin T.StimsonJames A.2004. “The Least Dangerous Branch Revisited: New Evidence on Supreme Court Responsiveness to Public Preferences.” Journal of Politics66 (4): 1018–35.
25.
MiddletonJoel A.ScottMarc A.DiakowRonliHillJennifer L.2016. “Bias Amplification and Bias Unmasking.” Political Analysis24 (3): 307–23.
26.
MishlerWilliamSheehanReginald S.1993. “The Supreme Court as a Countermajoritarian Institution? The Impact of Public Opinion on Supreme Court Decisions.” American Political Science Review87 (1): 87–101.
27.
MishlerWilliamSheehanReginald S.1996. “Public Opinion, the Attitudinal Model, and Supreme Court Decision Making: A Micro-analytic Perspective.” Journal of Politics59 (4): 1114–42.
28.
MontgomeryJacob M.NyhanBrendanTorresMichelle. 2018. “How Conditioning on Posttreatment Variables Can Ruin Your Experiment and What to Do about It.” American Journal of Political Science62 (3): 760–75.
29.
NorpothHelmutSegalJeffrey A.1994. “Comment: Popular Influence on Supreme Court Decisions.” American Political Science Review88 (3): 711–16.
30.
PildesRichard H.2010. “Is the Supreme Court a Majoritarian Institution?”The Supreme Court Review2010:103–58.
31.
SegalJeffrey A.SpaethHarold J.2002. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
StimsonJames A.1999. Public Opinion in America: Moods, Cycles, and Swings. Boulder: Westview Press.
33.
StimsonJames AMackuenMichael B.EriksonRobert S.1995. “Dynamic Representation.” American Political Science Review98 (3): 543–565.
34.
StrotherLogan. 2017. “How Expected Political and Legal Impact Drive Media Coverage of Supreme Court Cases.” Political Communication34 (3): 571–89.
35.
StrotherLogan. 2019. “Case Salience and the Influence of External Constraints on the Supreme Court.” Journal of Law and Courts7 (1): 129–47.
36.
UnahIsaacRosanoKristenMilamK. Dawn. 2015. “U.S. Supreme Court Justices and Public Mood.” Journal of Law & Politics30:293–340.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
