What characteristics do state supreme court justices prioritize when choosing leaders? At the federal level, collegial court leaders are appointed or rotated by seniority. A plurality of states permit peer-vote selection, but the consequences of employing this mechanism are not well known. We develop a theory of chief justice selection emphasizing experience, bias, and politics. Leveraging within-contest variation and more than a half century’s worth of original contest data, we find that chief justice peer votes often default to seniority rotation. Ideological divergence from the court median, governor, and legislature is largely unassociated with selection. Justices who dissent more than their peers are, however, disadvantaged. We find no evidence of discrimination against women or people of color. The results have implications for policy debates about political leader selection.
ArringtonNancy B.2018a. “Gender and Judicial Replacement: The Case of US State Supreme Courts.” Journal of Law and Courts6 (1): 127–54.
4.
ArringtonNancy B.2018b. “Qualification, Selection, and Retirement Characteristics of Women, Minority, and Minority Women State Supreme Court Judges.” In Race, Gender, Sexuality, and the Politics of the American Judiciary, eds. NavarroSharonHernandezSamantha. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 11–35.
5.
ArringtonNancy B.2020. “Group Selection and Opportunities for Gender Diversity in the Judiciary.” Representation: Journal of Representative Democracy56 (2): 149–71.
6.
BaronRobert A.1990. “Conflict in Organizations.” In Psychology in Organizations: Integrating Science and Practice, eds. MurphyKevin R.SaalFrank E.Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum, 197–216.
7.
Brandon L.BartelsBonneauChris W., eds. 2015. Making Law and Courts Research Relevant: The Normative Implications of Empirical Research. New York: Routledge.
8.
BeckNathaniel. 2015. “Estimating Grouped Data Models with a Binary Dependent Variable and Fixed Effects: What Are the Issues?” Working Paper, New York University, New York City.
BerryWilliam D.RingquistEvan J.FordingRichard C.HansonRussell L.1998. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States.” American Journal of Political Science42 (1): 327–48.
11.
BlackRyan C.OwensRyan J.ArmalyMiles T.2016. “A Well-Traveled Lot: A Research Note on Judicial Travel by U.S. Supreme Court Justices.” Justice System Journal37 (4): 367–84.
12.
BlauFrancine D.DevaroJed. 2007. “New Evidence on Gender Differences in Promotion Rates: An Empirical Analysis of a Sample of New Hires.” Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society46 (3): 511–50.
BonicaAdam. 2014. “Mapping the Ideological Marketplace.” American Journal of Political Science58 (2): 367–86.
16.
BonicaAdamWoodruffMichael J.2015. “A Common-Space Measure of State Supreme Court Ideology.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization31 (3): 472–98.
17.
BonneauChris W.HammondThomas H.MaltzmanForrestWahlbeckPaul J.2007. “Agenda Control, the Median Justice, and the Majority Opinion on the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science51 (4): 890–905.
BoyeaBrent D.2010. “Does Seniority Matter? The Conditional Influence of State Methods of Judicial Retention.” Social Science Quarterly91 (1): 209–27.
20.
BoyeaBrent D.2011. “Time Served in State Supreme Courts: Mapping the Determinants of Judicial Seniority.” Justice System Journal32 (1): 44–61.
21.
BoyeaBrent D.Farrar-MyersVictoria A.2011. “Leadership and Election Litigation in State Supreme Courts.” State and Local Government Review43 (1): 17–31.
22.
BracePaulHallMelinda Gann. 1990. “Neo-Institutionalism and Dissent in State Supreme Courts.” Journal of Politics52 (1): 54–70.
23.
BracePaulHallMelinda GannLangerLaura. 2001. “Placing State Supreme Courts in State Politics.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly1 (1): 81–108.
24.
BracePaulLangerLauraHallMelinda Gann. 2000. “Measuring the Preferences of State Supreme Court Judges.” Journal of Politics62 (2): 387–413.
25.
BrattonKathleen A.SpillRorie L.2002. “Existing Diversity and Judicial Selection: The Role of the Appointment Method in Establishing Gender Diversity in State Supreme Courts.” Social Science Quarterly83 (2): 504–18.
CaldeiraGregory A.ZornChristopher J. W.1998. “Of Time and Consensual Norms in the Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science42 (3): 874–902.
30.
Campbell-RockC.C.2012. “Backlash Against Efforts by La. Supreme Court to Turn Back the Clock Intensifies.”The Louisiana Weekly, June25.
31.
CannDamon M.2008. “Modeling Committee Chair Selection in the U.S. House of Representatives.” Political Analysis16 (3): 274–89.
CarrubbaCliffFriedmanBarryMartinAndrew D.VanbergGeorg. 2012. “Who Controls the Content of Supreme Court Opinions?” American Journal of Political Science56 (2): 400–12.
34.
ChiruMihailGherghinaSergiu. 2017. “Committee Chair Selection under High Informational and Organizational Constraints.” Party Politics25 (4): 547–58.
35.
Chisholm v. Edwards, 839 F. 2d 1056 (1988).
36.
Chisholm v. Jindal, 890 F. Supp. 2d 696 (2012).
37.
ChoiStephen J.GulatiG. MituPosnerEric A.2010. “Professionals or Politicians: The Uncertain Empirical Case for an Elected Rather than Appointed Judiciary.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization26 (2): 290–336.
38.
ChristensenRobert K.SzmerJohnStritchJustin M.2012. “Race and Gender Bias in Three Administrative Contexts: Impact on Work Assignments in State Supreme Courts.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory22 (4): 625–48.
39.
ChutkowDawn M.2014. “The Chief Justice as Executive: Judicial Conference Committee Appointments.” Journal of Law and Courts2 (2): 301–25.
40.
ClarkTom S.LauderdaleBenjamin. 2010. “Locating Supreme Court Opinions in Doctrine Space.” American Journal of Political Science54 (4): 871–90.
41.
CollinsTodd A.DumasTao L.MoyerLaura P.2017. “Intersection Disadvantages: Race, Gender, and Age Discrimination among Attorneys.” Social Science Quarterly98 (5): 1642–58.
42.
CollinsTodd A.MoyerLaura. 2008. “Gender, Race, and Intersectionality on the Federal Appellate Bench.” Political Research Quarterly61 (2): 219–27.
43.
CorleyPamela C.SteigerwaltAmyWardArtemus. 2013. “Revisiting the Roosevelt Court: The Critical Juncture from Consensus to Dissensus.” Journal of Supreme Court History38 (1): 20–50.
44.
CoupeTom. 2005. “Bias in Conditional and Unconditional Fixed Effects Logit Estimation: A Correction.” Political Analysis13 (3): 292–95.
45.
CurryTodd A.FixMichael P.2019. “May It Please the Twitterverse: The Use of Twitter by State High Court Judges.” Journal of Information Technology and Politics16 (4): 379–93.
46.
CurryTodd A.HurwitzMark S.2016. “Strategic Retirements of Elected and Appointed Justices: A Hazard Approach.” Journal of Politics78 (4): 1061–65.
47.
David J.DanelskiWardArtemus, eds. 2016. The Chief Justice: Appointment and Influence. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
48.
DarcyRobert. 1996. “Women in the State Legislative Power Structure: Committee Chairs.” Social Science Quarterly77 (4): 888–98.
49.
DavisSue. 1999. “The Chief Justice and Judicial Decision-Making: The Institutional Basis for Leadership on the Supreme Court.” In Supreme Court Decision-Making: New Institutional Approaches, eds. ClaytonCornell W.GillmanHoward. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 135–54.
50.
DawuniJosephineKangAlice. 2015. “Her Ladyship Chief Justice: The Rise of Female Leaders in the Judiciary in Africa.” Africa Today62 (2): 45–69.
51.
DeeringChristopher J.WahlbeckPaul J.2006. “U.S. House Committee Chair Selection.” American Politics Research34 (2): 223–42.
52.
DesposatoScott W.2006. “Parties for Rent? Ambition, Ideology, and Party Switching in Brazil’s Chamber of Deputies.” American Journal of Political Science50 (1): 62–80.
53.
EaglyAlice H.KarauSteven J.2002. “Role Congruity Theory of Prejudice toward Female Leaders.” Psychological Review109 (3): 573–98.
54.
EpsteinLeeKnightJack. 1998. The Choices Justices Make. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
55.
EpsteinLeeLandesWilliam M.PosnerRichard A.2013. The Behavior of Federal Judges: A Theoretical and Empirical Study of Rational Choice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
56.
EpsteinLeeShvetsovaOlga. 2002. “Heresthetical Maneuvering on the U.S. Supreme Court.” Journal of Theoretical Politics14 (1): 93–122.
57.
FarhangSeanKastellecJonathan P.WawroGregory J.2015. “The Politics of Opinion Assignment and Authorship on the U.S. Court of Appeals: Evidence from Sexual Harassment Cases.” The Journal of Legal Studies44 (Suppl. 1): S59–85.
58.
FerralKatelyn. 2016. “Relentless: A Hard-Driving Pioneer, Justice Shirley Abrahamson Inspires Both Admiration and Resentment.” The Capital Times, October26, p. 24.
59.
FifeMadelynGoelzhauserGregHodgsonKayleeVouvalisNicole. 2017. “Concurring and Dissenting without Opinion.” Journal of Supreme Court History42 (2): 171–92.
60.
FischerRonald. 2008. “Rewarding Seniority: Exploring Cultural and Organizational Predictors of Seniority Allocations.” The Journal of Social Psychology148 (2): 167–86.
61.
FouirnaiesAlexanderHallAndrew B.PaysonJulia. 2018. “How Gender Shapes Committee Service: Evidence from U.S. State Legislatures.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.
62.
GillRebecca D.2014. “Implicit Bias in Judicial Performance Evaluations: We Must Do Better than This.” Justice System Journal35 (3): 271–94.
63.
GillRebecca D.EugenisKate. 2019. “Do Voters Prefer Women Judges? Deconstructing the Competitive Advantage in State Supreme Court Elections.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly19 (4): 399–427.
64.
GillRebecca D.LazosSylvia R.WatersMallory M.2011. “Are Judicial Performance Evaluations Fair to Women and Minorities? A Cautionary Tale from Clark County, Nevada.” Law & Society Review45 (3): 731–59.
65.
GoelzhauserGreg. 2011. “Diversifying State Supreme Courts.” Law & Society Review45 (3): 761–81.
66.
GoelzhauserGreg. 2015a. “Graveyard Dissents on the Burger Court.” Journal of Supreme Court History40 (2): 188–202.
67.
GoelzhauserGreg. 2015b. “Silent Acquiescence on the Supreme Court.” Justice System Journal36 (1): 3–19.
68.
GoelzhauserGreg. 2016a. Choosing State Supreme Court Justices: Merit Selection and the Consequences of Institutional Reform. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
GoelzhauserGreg. 2018b. “Does Merit Selection Work? Evidence from Commission and Gubernatorial Choices.” Journal of Law & Courts6 (1): 155–87.
72.
GoelzhauserGreg. 2019. Judicial Merit Selection: Institutional Design and Performance for State Courts. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
73.
GoelzhauserGreg. 2020. “Intersectional Representation on State Supreme Courts.” In Open Judicial Politics, eds. SolbergRorie SpillDisascroJennifer SegalWaltenburgEric. Corvallis: Oregon State University Press, 65–86.
74.
GrahamBarbara Luck. 1990. “Do Judicial Selection Systems Matter? A Study of Black Representation on State Courts.” American Politics Quarterly18 (3): 316–36.
75.
HaireSusan B.MoyerLaura P.2015. Diversity Matters: Judicial Policy Making in the U.S. Courts of Appeals. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
76.
HallMatthew E. K.WindettJason Harold. 2016. “Discouraging Dissent: The Chief Judges? Influence in State Supreme Courts.” American Politics Research44 (4): 682–709.
77.
HallMelinda Gann. 1990. “Opinion Assignment Procedures and Conference Practices in State Supreme Courts.” Judicature73 (4): 209–14.
78.
HallMelinda Gann. 2001. “Voluntary Retirements from State Supreme Courts: Assessing Democratic Pressures to Relinquish the Bench.” Journal of Politics63 (4): 1112–40.
79.
HallMelinda GannBracePaul. 1989. “Order in the Courts: A Neo-Institutional Approach to Judicial Consensus.” Western Political Quarterly42 (3): 391–407.
80.
HallMelinda GannBracePaul. 1992. “Toward an Integrated Model of Judicial Voting Behavior.” American Politics Quarterly20 (2): 147–68.
81.
HammondThomas H.BonneauChris W.SheehanReginald S.2005. Strategic Behavior and Policy Choice on the U.S. Supreme Court. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
82.
HandbergRoger. 1978. “Leadership in State Courts of Last Resort: The Interaction of Environment and Procedure.” Jurimetrics19 (2): 178–85.
83.
HansenEric R.ClarkChristopher J.2020. “Diversity in Party Leadership in State Legislatures.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly20:81–107.
84.
HauseggerLoriHaynieSacia. 2003. “Judicial Decisionmaking and the Use of Panels in the Canadian Supreme Court and the South African Appellate Division.” Law & Society Review37 (3): 635–57.
85.
HaynieStacia L.1992. “Leadership and Consensus on the U.S. Supreme Court.” Journal of Politics54 (4): 1158–69.
86.
HeckEdward V.HallMelinda Gann. 1981. “Bloc Voting and The Freshman Justice Revisited.” Journal of Politics43 (3): 852–60.
87.
HeilmanMadeline E.2001. “Description and Prescription: How Gender Stereotypes Prevent Women’s Ascent up the Organizational Ladder.” Journal of Social Issues57 (4): 657–74.
88.
HendershotMarcus E.HurwitzMark S.LanierDrew NoblePacelleRichard L.Jr.2013. “Dissensual Decision Making: Revisiting the Demise of Consensual Norms within the U.S. Supreme Court.” Political Research Quarterly66 (2): 467–81.
89.
HettingerVirginia A.LindquistStefanie A.MartinekWendy L.2003. “Acclimation Effects and Separate Opinion Writing in the U.S. Court of Appeals.” Social Science Quarterly84 (4): 792–810.
90.
HughesDavid A.WilhelmTeenaViningRichard L.Jr.2015. “Deliberation Rules and Opinion Assignment Procedures in State Supreme Courts: A Replication.” Justice System Journal36 (4): 395–410.
91.
HurwitzMark S.LanierDrew Noble. 2003. “Explaining Judicial Diversity: The Differential Ability of Women and Minorities to Attain Seats on State Supreme and Appellate Courts.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly3 (4): 329–52.
92.
HurwitzMark S.LanierDrew Noble. 2008. “Diversity in State and Federal Appellate Courts: Change and Continuity across 20 Years.” Justice System Journal29 (1): 47–70.
93.
HurwitzMark S.StefkoJoseph V.2004. “Acclimation and Attitudes: ‘Newcomer’ Justices and Precedent Conformance on the Supreme Court.” Political Research Quarterly57 (1): 121–29.
94.
JensenJennifer M.MartinekWendy L.2009. “The Effects of Race and Gender on the Judicial Ambitions of State Trial Court Judges.” Political Research Quarterly62 (2): 379–92.
95.
KahenyErin B.SzmerJohnChristensenRobert K.2019. “Status Characteristics and their Intersectionality: Majority Opinion Assignment in State Supreme Courts.” Politics, Groups, and Identities. Published online before print February 6. doi:10.1080/21565503.2019.1569538.
96.
Karaca-MandicPinarNortonEdward C.DowdBryan. 2012. “Interaction Terms in Nonlinear Models.” Health Services Research47 (1): 225–74.
97.
KatzEthan. 2001. “Bias in Conditional and Unconditional Fixed Effects Logit Estimation.” Political Analysis9 (4): 379–84.
98.
KrauseThomas W.2006. “Florida Chief Justice Urges Civics Education.” The Tampa Tribune, December25, p. 1.
99.
LangerLaura. 2002. Judicial Review in State Supreme Courts: A Comparative Study. Albany: State University of New York Press.
100.
LangerLauraMcMullenJodyRayNicholas P.StrattonDaniel D.2003. “Recruitment of Chief Justices on State Supreme Courts: A Choice between Institutional and Personal Goals.” The Journal of Politics65 (3): 656–75.
101.
LangerLauraWilhelmTeena. 2005. “The Ideology of State Supreme Court Chief Justices.” Judicature89 (1): 78–86.
102.
LeonardMeghan E.RossJoseph V.2014. “Consensus and Cooperation on State Supreme Courts.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly14 (1): 3–28.
103.
MartinLanny W.StevensonRandolph T.2001. “Government Formation in Parliamentary Democracies.” American Journal of Political Science45 (1): 33–50.
104.
McConkieStanford. 1976. “Decision-Making in State Supreme Courts.” Judicature59 (7): 337–43.
105.
McCormickPeter. 2013. “Choosing the Chief: Duality, Seniority, and Beyond.” Journal of Canadian Studies47 (1): 5–35.
106.
McFaddenDaniel. 1973. “Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior.” In Frontiers in Econometrics, ed. ZarembkaP.New York: Academic Press, 105–42.
107.
NorrisMikelTankersleyHolley. 2018. “Women Rule: Gendered Leadership and State Supreme Court Chief Justice Selection.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy39 (1): 104–25.
108.
O’BrienDiana Z.2012. “Gender and Select Committee Elections in the British House of Commons.” Politics & Gender8 (2): 178–204.
PalmerMaxwell. 2016. “Does the Chief Justice Make Partisan Appointments to Special Courts and Panels?” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies13 (1): 153–77.
111.
ParkGregoryYadenDavid BryceSchwartzH. AndrewKernMargaret L.EichstaedtJohannes C.KosinskiMichaelStillwellDavidUngarLyle H.SeligmanMartin E. P. 2016. “Women Are Warmer but No Less Assertive than Men: Gender and Language on Facebook.” PLoS ONE11 (5): e0155885. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0155885.
112.
PeppersTodd C.OldfatherChad M.2012. “Till Death Do Us Part: Chief Justices and the United States Supreme Court.” Marquette Law Review95 (2): 709–34.
113.
Perschall v. Louisiana, 697 So. 2d 240 (1997).
114.
PittDavid. 2020. “Acting Iowa Chief Justice: Independence Is Judiciary’s Strength.” Telegraph Herald, January16, p. D4.
115.
PolsbyNelson W.GallaherMiriamRundquistBarry Spencer. 1969. “The Growth of the Seniority System in the U.S. House of Representatives.” American Political Science Review63 (3): 787–807.
116.
PosnerRichard. [2008] 2010. How Judges Think. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
117.
RawlsJohn. 1987. “The Idea of an Overlapping Consensus.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies7 (1): 1–25.
118.
RiveraLauren A.TilcsikAndras. 2016. “Class Advantage, Commitment Penalty: The Gendered Effect of Social Class Signals in an Elite Labor Market.” American Sociological Review81 (6): 1097–131.
119.
RusbultCaryl E.InskoChester A.LinYuan-Huei W.1995. “Seniority-Based Reward Allocation in the United States and Taiwan.” Social Psychology Quarterly58 (1): 13–30.
ScolaBecki. 2013. “Predicting Presence at the Intersections: Assessing the Variation in Women’s Office Holding across the States.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly13 (3): 333–48.
122.
SenMaya. 2014. “How Judicial Qualification Ratings May Disadvantage Minority and Female Candidates.” Journal of Law & Courts2 (1): 33–65.
123.
SenMaya. 2015. “Is Justice Really Blind? Race and Reversal in US Courts.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies44 (1): 187–229.
SmithNinaSmithValdemarVernerMette. 2013. “Why are So Few Females Promoted into CEO and Vice President Positions? Danish Empirical Evidence, 1997-2007.” ILR Review66 (2): 380–408.
126.
SmythRussellNarayanParesh Kumar. 2004. “Hail to the Chief! Leadership and Structural Change in the Level of Consensus of the High Court of Australia.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies1 (2): 399–427.
UrofskyMelvin I.1985. “The Brandeis-Frankfurter Conversations.” Supreme Court Review1985:299–340.
135.
ViningRichard L.Jr.WilhelmTeena. 2010. “Explaining High-Profile Coverage of State Supreme Court Decisions.” Social Science Quarterly91 (3): 704–23.
136.
ViningRichard L.Jr.WilhelmTeena. 2012. “The Chief Justice as Advocate-in-Chief.” Judicature95 (6): 267–74.
137.
ViningRichard L.Jr.WilhelmTeenaWanlessEmily. 2019. “Succession, Opportunism, and Rebellion on State Supreme Courts: Decisions to Run for Chief Justice.” Justice System Journal40:286–301.
138.
WalkerThomas G.EpsteinLeeDixonWilliam J.1988. “On the Mysterious Demise of Consensual Norms in the United States Supreme Court.” Journal of Politics50 (2): 361–89.
139.
WetsteinMatthew E.OstbergC. L.2005. “Strategic Leadership and Political Change on the Canadian Supreme Court: Analyzing the Transition to Chief Justice.” Canadian Journal of Political Science38 (3): 653–73.
140.
WilhelmTeenaViningRichard L.Jr.BoldtEthan D.BlackBryan M.2020. “Judicial Reform in the American States: The Chief Justice as Political Advocate.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly20:135–56.
141.
WilhelmTeenaViningRichard L.BoldtEthanTrochessetAllison. 2019. “Examining State of the Judiciary Addresses: A Research Note.” Justice System Journal40 (2): 158–69.
142.
WindettJason H.HardenJeffrey J.HallMatthew E. K.2015. “Estimating Dynamic Ideal Points for State Supreme Courts.” Political Analysis23 (3): 461–69.
143.
YapMargaretKonradAlison M.2009. “Gender and Racial Differentials in Promotions: Is There a Sticky Floor, a Mid-Level Bottleneck, or a Glass Ceiling?” Relations Industrielles64 (4): 593–619.
144.
YoungJoAnne. 2008. “State Supreme Court Chief Justice Speaks to Legislature.” Lincoln Journal Star, January26, p. B1.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
