Using original survey data from the Cooperative Congressional Election Survey (CCES), we examine variation in racial and ethnic group and partisan attitudes toward legislators and representation. Respondents were asked about their views on descriptive representation, its importance for their own elected official, and whether it was important to have more descriptive representatives in general. Using respondents’ personal characteristics such as education, partisanship, race, ethnicity, income, and race and ethnicity of their House of Representatives member, we analyze the impact of these variables on attitudes toward representation. We find that Latino and Black respondents place a high level of importance on having descriptive representatives in their own districts in addition to articulating a high degree of importance to having more representatives from their respective group. However, Latino Republicans place less importance on descriptive representation overall than Latino non-Republican respondents. Non-Latino Republicans also place importance on more legislators of their same race or ethnicity. The findings have implications for democratic governance as the demographics of the United States rapidly changes.
AnsolabehereS.SchaffnerB. (2014). Does survey mode matter?Political Analysis, 22, 285-303.
5.
BafumiJ.HerronM. (2010). Leapfrog representation and extremism: A study of American voters and their members in Congress. American Political Science Review, 104, 519-542.
6.
BarretoM. (2007). Sí se puede! Latino candidates and the mobilization of Latino voters. American Political Science Review, 101, 425-441.
7.
BarretoM. (2010). Ethnic cues: The role of shared ethnicity in Latino participation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
8.
BarretoM.SeguraG.WoodsN. (2004). The mobilizing effect of majority minority districts on Latino turnout. American Political Science Review, 98, 65-75.
9.
BoboL.GilliamF.Jr. (1990). Race, sociopolitical participation, and Black empowerment. American Political Science Review, 84, 377-393.
10.
BowlerS.SeguraG. (2012). The future is ours: Minority politics, political behavior, and the multiracial era of American politics. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
11.
CampbellA.ConverseP.MillerW.StokesD. (1960). The American voter. New York, NY: Wiley.
12.
CanonD. (1999). Race, redistricting, and representation: The unintended consequences of Black majority districts. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
13.
CasellasJ. (2010). Latino representation in state houses and congress. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
14.
DawsonM. (1994). Behind the mule. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15.
de la GarzaR.CortinaJ. (2007). Are Latinos republicans but just don’t know it? The Latino vote in the 2000 and 2004 presidential elections. American Politics Research, 35, 202-223.
16.
DoviS. (2002). Preferable descriptive representatives: Will just any woman, Black or Latino do?American Political Science Review, 96, 729-743.
17.
FennoR. (1978). Home style. Boston, MA: Free Press.
18.
GambleK. (2007). Black political representation: An examination of legislative activities within the U.S. house of representatives. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 32, 421-447.
19.
GayC. (2002). Spirals of trust? The effect of descriptive representation on the relationship between citizens and their government. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 717-732.
20.
GilesM.HertzK. (1994). Racial threat and partisan identification. American Political Science Review, 88, 317-326.
21.
GroseC. (2011). Congress in Black and White: Race and representation in Washington and at home. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
22.
HaynieK. (2003). African American legislators in the American states. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
23.
HeroR. (2000). Faces of inequality. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
24.
HeroR.TolbertC. (1995). Latinos and substantive representation in the U.S. house of representatives: Direct, indirect, or nonexistent?American Journal of Political Science, 39, 640-652.
KingG.TomzM.WhittenbergJ. (2000). Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 347-361.
27.
LongJ. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
LublinD. (1997). The paradox of representation: Racial gerrymandering and minority interests in congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29.
MansbridgeJ. (1999). Should Blacks represent Blacks and women represent women? A contingent yes. The Journal of Politics, 61, 628-657.
30.
MansbridgeJ. (2003). Rethinking representation. American Political Science Review, 97, 515-528.
31.
ManzanoS.SanchezG. (2010). Take one for the team: Ethnic identity, candidate qualification and co-ethnic voting. Political Research Quarterly, 63, 568-580.
32.
MayhewD. (1974). Congress: The electoral connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
33.
McClainP.CarterN.DeFrancesco SotoV.LyleM.GrynaviskiJ.NunnallyS.. . . Davenport CottonK. (2006). Racial distancing in a southern city: Latino immigrants’ views of Black Americans. The Journal of Politics, 68, 571-584.
34.
McConnaughyC.WhiteI.LealD.CasellasJ. (2010). A Latino on the ballot: Explaining coethnic voting among Latinos and the response of White Americans. The Journal of Politics, 72, 1199-1211.
35.
MichelsonM. (2005). Does ethnicity trump party? Competing vote cues and Latino voting behavior. Journal of Political Marketing, 4(4), 1-25.
36.
MillerW.ShanksM. (1996). The new American voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37.
MintaM. (2011). Oversight: Representing the interests of Blacks and Latinos in congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38.
O’BrienR. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity, 41, 673-690.
39.
PantojaA.SeguraG. (2003). Does ethnicity matter? Descriptive representation in legislatures and political alienation among Latinos. Social Science Quarterly, 84, 441-460.
40.
PitkinH. (1967). The concept of representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
41.
RochaR.TolbertC.BowenD.ClarkC. (2010). Race and turnout: Does descriptive representation in state legislatures increase minority voting. Political Research Quarterly, 63, 890-907.
42.
SanchezG. (2006). The role of group consciousness in political participation among Latinos in the united states. American Politics Research, 34, 427-450.
43.
SanchezG.MorinJ. (2011). The effect of descriptive representation on Latinos’ views of government and of themselves. Social Science Quarterly, 92, 483-508.
44.
SchildkrautD. (2013). Birds of a feather flock together? Assessing attitudes about descriptive representation among Latinos and Asian Americans. American Politics Research, 41, 699-729.
45.
SwainC. (1993). Black faces, Black interests. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
46.
TateK. (2003). Black faces in the mirror. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
WallaceS. (2014). Examining Latino support for descriptive representation: The role of identity and discrimination. Social Science Quarterly, 95, 311-327. doi:10.1111/ssqu.12038
49.
WaltonH.SmithR. (2011). American politics and the African American quest for universal freedom (6th ed.). New York, NY: Longman Press.
