In this study, we explore the predictors of gender linked fate with a focus on marital status for different racial/ethnic groups. We argue that marriage alters women’s perceptions of self-interest by institutionalizing their partnerships with men and consequently leading women to feel less connected to other women. We assess our hypothesis using the 2012 American National Election Study. While we find that married white women and Latinas have significantly lower levels of linked fate than unmarried women of the same race/ethnicity, we find no such relationship for black women. We then explore the implications of these findings by examining the role of gender linked fate in explaining political differences among married and unmarried women using mediation analysis. Ultimately, we find that differences in perceptions of linked fate explain a significant amount of the variation in political ideology and partisanship for white and Latina women.
AddoFenaba R.LichterDaniel T.2013. “Marriage, Marital History, and Black–White Wealth Differentials among Older Women.” Journal of Marriage and Family75 (2): 342–62.
2.
Baca ZinnMaxinePokAngela Y. H.2002. “Tradition and Transition in Mexican-Origin Families.” In Minority Families in the United States, edited by TaylorRonald L., 79–100. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
3.
BaxterSandraLansingMarjorie. 1983. Women and Politics: The Visible Majority. Ann Harbor: University of Michigan Press.
4.
BeckPaul Allen. 1991. “Voters’ Intermediation Environments in the 1988 Presidential Contest.” Public Opinion Quarterly55 (3): 371–94.
5.
BedollaLisa GarcíaScolaBecki. 2006. “Finding Intersection: Race, Class, and Gender in the 2003 California Recall Vote.” Politics & Gender2 (1): 5–27.
6.
BianchiSuzanne. 1995. “Changing Economic Roles of Women and Men.” In State of the Union: American in the 1990s, edited by FarleyReynolds, 107–54. New York: Russell Sage.
7.
BolzendahlCatherine I.MyersDaniel J.2004. “Feminist Attitudes and Support for Gender Equality: Opinion Change in Women and Men, 1974–1998.” Social Forces83 (2): 759–89.
8.
BrownNadia E.2014. Sisters in the Statehouse: Black Women and Legislative Decision Making. New York: Oxford University Press.
9.
BudigMichelle J.EnglandPaula. 2001. “The Wage Penalty for Motherhood.” American Sociological Review66 (2): 204–25.
10.
BulcroftRichard A.BulcroftKris A.1993. “Race Differences in Attitudinal and Motivational Factors in the Decision to Marry.” Journal of Marriage and Family55 (2): 338–55.
11.
BurdenBarry C.2004. “An Alternative Account of the 2004 Presidential Election.” The Forum2 (4): 2.
12.
CasperLynne M.BianchiSuzanne M.2001. Continuity and Change in the American Family. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
13.
CechErin A.Blair-LoyMary. 2010. “Perceiving Glass Ceilings? Meritocratic versus Structural Explanations of Gender Inequality among Women in Science and Technology.” Social Problems57 (3): 371–97.
14.
ChaneyCarole KennedyAlvarezR. MichaelNaglerJonathan. 1998. “Explaining the Gender Gap in US Presidential Elections, 1980-1992.” Political Research Quarterly51 (2): 311–39.
15.
CherlinAndrew J.1998. “Marriage and Marital Dissolution among Black Americans.” Journal of Comparative Family Studies29 (1): 147–58.
16.
ChongDennisCitrinJackConleyPatricia. 2001. “When Self-Interest Matters.” Political Psychology22 (3): 541–70.
17.
CollinsToddMoyerLaura. 2007. “Gender, Race, and Intersectionality on the Federal Appellate Bench.” Political Research Quarterly20 (1): 1–9.
ConoverPamela Johnston. 1988. “Feminists and the Gender Gap.” The Journal of Politics50 (4): 985–1010.
20.
DawsonMichael. 1994. Behind the Mule: Race and Class in African-American Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
21.
EdlundLenaPandeRohini. 2002. “Why Have Women Become Left-Wing? The Political Gender Gap and the Decline in Marriage.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics117 (3): 917–61.
22.
ElyRobin J.1995. “The Power in Demography: Women’s Social Constructions of Gender Identity at Work.” Academy of Management Journal38 (3): 589–634.
23.
FerreeMyra Marx. 1990. “Beyond Separate Spheres: Feminism and Family Research.” Journal of Marriage and Family52 (4): 866–84.
24.
GayClaudineHochschildJenniferWhiteAriel. 2016. “Americans’ Belief in Linked Fate: Does the Measure Capture the Concept?”Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics1 (1): 117–44.
25.
GayClaudineTateKatherine. 1998. “Doubly Bound: The Impact of Gender and Race on the Politics of Black Women.” Political Psychology19 (1): 169–84.
26.
GersonKathleen. 1987. “Emerging Social Divisions among Women: Implications for Welfare State Politics.” Politics & Society15 (2): 213–21.
27.
GersonKathleen. 2010. The Unfinished Revolution: Coming of Age in a New Era of Gender, Work, and Family. New York: Oxford University Press.
GoldsteinJoshua R.HarknettKristen. 2006. “Parenting across Racial and Class Lines: Assortative Mating Patterns of New Parents Who Are Married, Cohabiting, Dating or No Longer Romantically Involved.” Social Forces85 (1): 121–43.
30.
GuptaSanjiv. 1999. “The Effects of Transitions in Marital Status on Men’s Performance of Housework.” Journal of Marriage and Family61 (3): 700–11.
31.
GurinPatricia. 1985. “Women’s Gender Consciousness.” Public Opinion Quarterly49 (2): 143–63.
32.
GurinPatriciaMillerArthur H.GurinGerald. 1980. “Stratum Identification and Consciousness.” Social Psychology Quarterly43 (1): 30–47.
HarnoisCatherine E.2015. “Race, Ethnicity, Sexuality, and Women’s Political Consciousness of Gender.” Social Psychology Quarterly78 (4): 365–86.
35.
HarrisKathleen Mullan. 1993. “Work and Welfare among Single Mothers in Poverty.” American Journal of Sociology99 (2): 317–52.
36.
hooksbell. 1981. Ain’t I a Woman: Black Women and Feminism. Vol. 3. Boston: South End Press.
37.
HowellSusan E.DayChristine L.2000. “Complexities of the Gender Gap.” Journal of Politics62 (3): 858–74.
38.
ImaiKosukeKeeleLukeTingleyDustinYamamotoTeppei. 2011. “Unpacking the Black Box of Causality: Learning about Causal Mechanisms from Experimental and Observational Studies.” American Political Science Review105 (4): 765–89.
39.
JenningsM. KentStokerLaura. 2001. “Political Similarity and Influence between Husbands and Wives.” Working paper. University of California, Berkeley.
40.
JunnJaneBrownNadia. 2008. “What Revolution?” In Political Women and American Democracy, edited by WolbrechtChristinaBeckwithKarenBaldezLisa, 64–78. New York: Cambridge University Press.
41.
JunnJaneMasuokaNatalie. 2008. “Asian American Identity: Shared Racial Status and Political Context.” Perspectives on Politics6 (4): 729–40.
42.
KalmijnMatthijs. 2003. “Shared Friendship Networks and the Life Course: An Analysis of Survey Data on Married and Cohabiting Couples.” Social Networks25 (3): 231–49.
43.
KaneEmily W.2000. “Racial and Ethnic Variations in Gender-Related Attitudes.” Annual Review of Sociology26:419–39.
44.
KaufmannKaren M.2002. “Culture Wars, Secular Realignment, and the Gender Gap in Party Identification.” Political Behavior24 (3): 283–307.
45.
KingstonPaul WilliamFinkelSteven E.1987. “Is There a Marriage Gap in Politics?”Journal of Marriage and Family49 (1): 57–64.
46.
LesthaegheRon J.2010. “The Unfolding Story of the Second Demographic Transition.” Population and Development Review36 (2): 211–51.
47.
MansbridgeJaneTateKatherine. 1992. “Race Trumps Gender: The Thomas Nomination in the Black Community.” PS: Political Science & Politics25 (3): 488–92.
48.
MillerArthur H.GurinPatriciaGurinGeraldMalanchukOksana. 1981. “Group Consciousness and Political Participation.” American Journal of Political Science25 (3): 494–511.
49.
MontoyaLisa J.1996. “Latino Gender Differences in Public Opinion: Results from the Latino National Political Survey.” Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences18 (2): 255–76.
50.
PlutzerEric. 1988. “Work Life, Family Life, and Women’s Support of Feminism.” American Sociological Review53 (4): 640–49.
51.
PlutzerEric. 1991. “Preferences in Family Politics: Women’s Consciousness or Family Context?”Political Geography Quarterly10 (2): 162–73.
52.
RaginsBelle RoseScanduraTerri A.1995. “Antecedents and Work-Related Correlates of Reported Sexual Harassment: An Empirical Investigation of Competing Hypotheses.” Sex Roles32 (7–8): 429–55.
RoehlingPatricia V.JarvisLorna HernandezSwopeHeather E.2005. “Variations in Negative Work-Family Spillover among White, Black, and Hispanic American Men and Women: Does Ethnicity Matter?”Journal of Family Issues26 (6): 840–65.
55.
RotoloThomas. 2000. “A Time to Join, a Time to Quit: The Influence of Life Cycle Transitions on Voluntary Association Membership.” Social Forces78 (3): 1133–61.
56.
SanchezGabriel R.MasuokaNatalie. 2010. “Brown-Utility Heuristic? The Presence and Contributing Factors of Latino Linked Fate.” Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences32 (4): 519–31.
57.
SanchezGabriel R.VargasEdward D.2016. “Taking a Closer Look at Group Identity: The Link between Theory and Measurement of Group Consciousness and Linked Fate.” Political Research Quarterly69 (1): 160–74.
58.
SayerLiana C.FineLeigh. 2011. “Racial-Ethnic Differences in U.S. Married Women’s and Men’s Housework.” Social Indicators Research101 (2): 259–65.
59.
SchildkrautDeborah J.2007. “Defining American Identity in the Twenty-First Century: How Much ‘There’ Is There?” Journal of Politics69 (3): 597–615.
60.
SchoenRobert. 2016. “The Continuing Retreat of Marriage United States Females, 2000–2005 and 2005–2010.” In Dynamic Demographic Analysis, edited by SchoenRobert, 203–15. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
61.
Silber MohamedHeather. 2015. “Americana or Latina? Gender and Identity Acquisition among Hispanics in the United States.” Politics, Groups, and Identities3 (1): 40–58.
62.
SimienEvelyn M.2006. Black Feminist Voices in Politics. Albany: State University of New York Press.
63.
StokerLauraJenningsM. Kent. 1995. “Life-Cycle Transitions and Political Participation: The Case of Marriage.” American Political Science Review89 (2): 421–33.
64.
StokesAtiya Kai. 2003. “Latino Group Consciousness and Political Participation.” American Politics Research31 (4): 361–78.
65.
TateKatherine. 1993. From Protest to Politics: The New Black Voters in American Elections. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
66.
The American National Election Studies. 2012. The ANES 2012 Time Series Study. Stanford University and the University of Michigan. www.electionstudies.org (accessed March 25, 2017).
WightVanessa R.BianchiSuzanne M.HuntBijou R.2013. “Explaining Racial/Ethnic Variation in Partnered Women’s and Men’s Housework: Does One Size Fit All?”Journal of Family Issues34 (3): 394–427.
71.
WrightAustinSharonD.MiddletonRichard T.YonRachel. 2011. “The Effect of Racial Group Consciousness on the Political Participation of African Americans and Black Ethnics in Miami-Dade County, Florida.” Political Research Quarterly65 (3): 629–41.
72.
ZuoJipingTangShengming. 2000. “Breadwinner Status and Gender Ideologies of Men and Women regarding Family Roles.” Sociological Perspectives43 (1): 29–43.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
