Political geography has long played a prominent role in conceptions of political realignments. In this article, I apply a spatial analysis to examine the political geography of voting during one of the principal political realignments in American electoral history, the 1928—1936 Democratic realignment. The spatial analysis challenges some of our common conceptions of this realignment. For example, increased support for the Democrats and Al Smith in 1928 was not limited to urban areas, as Smith enjoyed widespread increases in Democratic support in largely rural Western locations. In the 1932 election, unemployment actually impeded shifts toward Franklin Roosevelt and the Democrats in most locales. Changes in voter support during this period were highly localized and subnational. Geographically Weighted Regressions demonstrate that this localized political geography was shaped by extensive geographic variation in how political and demographic factors influenced voting behavior across the United States.
Andersen, K. (1979). The creation of a Democratic majority, 1928-1936 . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
Anselin, L. (1990). Spatial dependence and spatial structural instability in applied regression analysis. Journal of Regional Science , 30, 185-207.
3.
Anselin, L. (1995). Local indicators of spatial association-LISA. Geographical Analysis, 27, 93-115.
4.
Anselin, L., & Bera, A.K. (1998). Spatial dependence in linear regression models with an introduction to spatial econometrics. In A. Ullah & D. E. A. Giles (Eds.), Handbook of applied economic statistics (pp. 237-289). New York: Marcel Dekker.
5.
Baller, R.D., & Richardson, K.K. (2002). Social integration, imitation, and the geographic patterning of suicide. American Sociological Review, 67, 873-888.
6.
Beck, N., Gleditsch, K., & Beardsley, K. (2006). Space is more than geography: Using spatial econometrics in the study of political economy. International Studies Quarterly , 50, 27-44.
7.
Brown, C. (1988). Mass dynamics of U.S. presidential competitions, 1928-1936. American Political Science Review, 82, 1153-1181.
8.
Brown, C. (1991). Ballots of tumult: A portrait of volatility in American voting. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
9.
Burnham, W.D. (1965). The changing shape of the American political universe . American Political Science Review, 59, 7-28.
10.
Burnham, W.D. (1970). Critical elections and the mainsprings of American politics. New York: Norton.
11.
Cho, W.K.T. (2003). Contagion effects and ethnic contribution networks . American Journal of Political Science, 47, 368-387.
12.
Cleveland, W.S. (1979). Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. Journal of the American Statistical Association , 74, 829-836.
13.
Darmofal, D. (2006). The political geography of macro-level turnout in American political development. Political Geography, 25, 123-150.
14.
Degler, C.N. (1964). American political parties and the rise of the city: An interpretation. Journal of American History, 51, 41-59.
15.
Fotheringham, A.S., Brunsdon, C., & Charlton, M. (2002). Geographically weighted regression: The analysis of spatially varying relationships. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley.
16.
Fotheringham, A.S., Charlton, M.E., & Brunsdon, C. (1998). Geographically weighted regression: A natural evolution of the expansion method for spatial data analysis. Environment and Planning A, 30, 1905-1927.
17.
Gimpel, J.G., & Cho, W.K.T. (2004). The persistence of White ethnicity in New England politics. Political Geography, 23, 987-1008.
18.
Gimpel, J.G., & Schuknecht, J.E. (2003). Patchwork nation: Sectionalism and political change in American politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
19.
Gleditsch, K.S., & Ward, M.D. (2000). Peace and war in time and space: The role of democratization . International Studies Quarterly, 43, 1-29.
20.
Key, V.O., Jr. (1955). A theory of critical elections. Journal of Politics, 17, 3-18.
21.
Key, V.O., Jr. (1959). Secular realignment and the party system. Journal of Politics, 21, 198-210.
22.
Lubell, S. (1956). The future of American politics (2nd ed.). Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
23.
Nardulli, P.F. (1995). The concept of a critical realignment, electoral behavior, and political change. American Political Science Review, 89, 10-22.
24.
Nardulli, P.F. (2005). Popular efficacy in the democratic era: A re-examination of electoral accountability in the U.S., 1828-2000. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25.
O'Loughlin, J., & Anselin, L. (1996). Geo-economic competition and trade bloc formation: United States, German, and Japanese exports, 1968-1992. Economic Geography, 72, 131-160.
26.
Renshaw, P. (1999). Was there a Keynesian economy in the USA between 1933 and 1945? Journal of Contemporary History, 34, 337-364.
27.
Siverson, R.M., & Starr, H. (1990). Opportunity, willingness, and the diffusion of war. American Political Science Review, 84, 47-67.
28.
Smiley, G. (1983). Recent unemployment rate estimates for the 1920s and 1930s. Journal of Economic History, 43, 487-493.
29.
Starr, H., & Most, B.A. (1978). A return journey: Richardson, "frontiers," and wars in the 1946-1965 era. Journal of Conflict Resolution , 22, 441-67.
30.
Sundquist, J.L. (1983). Dynamics of the party system: Alignment and realignment of political parties in the United States (Rev. ed.). Washington, DC: Brookings.
