We consider how state political environments can alter the party identification and political behavior of individuals. Using panel data well-suited to assess the influence of migration on individual-level phenomena, we find that migrants alter their party identifications toward the majority party of their new states. Applying the estimates from this analysis to the 2000 presidential election suggests that individual-level change can alter presidential election outcomes in states if migration patterns meet certain conditions.
Arbuckle, J.L. (1996). Full information estimation in the presence of missing data. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques (pp. 243-277). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
Bartels, L.M. (2000). Partisanship and voting behavior, 1952-1996. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 35-50.
3.
Brown, T.A. (1988). Migration and politics: The impact of population mobility on American voting behavior. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
4.
Burden, B.C., & Greene, S. (2000). Party attachments and state election laws. Political Research Quarterly, 53, 63-76.
5.
Campbell, A., Converse, P.E., Miller, W.E., & Stokes, D.E. (1960). The American voter. New York : Wiley.
6.
Carsey, T.M., & Layman, G.C. (2006). Changing sides or changing minds? Party identification and policy preferences in theAmerican electorate. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 464-477.
7.
Davies, P.S., Greenwood, M.J., & Li, H. (2001). A conditional logit approach to U.S. state-to-state migration. Journal of Regional Science, 41, 337-360.
8.
Elazar, D.J. (1984). American federalism: A view from the states (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
9.
Enders, C.K., & Bandalos, D.L. (2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 430-457.
10.
Erikson, R.S., Wright, G.C., & McIver, J.P. (1993). Statehouse democracy: Public opinion and policy in the American states. New York: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Fiorina, M.P. (1981). Retrospective voting in American national elections . New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
12.
Francia, P.L., & Herrnson, P.S. (2004). The synergistic effect of campaign effort and election reform on voter turnout in state legislative elections. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 4, 74-93.
13.
Franklin, C.H. (1984). Issue preferences, socialization, and the evolution of partisan identification. American Journal of Political Science, 28, 459-478.
14.
Franklin, C.H. (1992). Measurement and the dynamics of party identification . Political Behavior, 14, 297-309.
15.
Gimpel, J.G., & Schuknecht, J.E. (2003). Patchwork nation: Sectionalism and political change in American politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
16.
Goren, P. (2005). Party identification and core political values . American Journal of Political Science, 49, 881-896.
17.
Green, D.P., & Palmquist, B. (1990). Of artifacts and partisan stability. American Journal of Political Science, 34, 872-902.
18.
Green, D.P., & Palmquist, B. (1994). How stable is party identification? Political Behavior, 16, 437-466.
19.
Green, D.P., Palmquist, B., & Schickler, E. (2002). Partisan hearts and minds. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
20.
Huckfeldt, R., Beck, P.A., Dalton, R.J., Levine, J., & Morgan, W. (1998). Ambiguity, distorted messages, and nested environmental effects on political communication. Journal of Politics, 60, 996-1030.
21.
Huckfeldt, R., Johnson, P.E., & Sprague, J. (2002). Political environments, political dynamics, and the survival of disagreement. Journal of Politics, 64, 1-21.
22.
Huckfeldt, R., Johnson, P.E., & Sprague, J. (2004). Political disagreement: The survival of diverse opinions within communication networks. New York: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. (1995). Citizens, politics and social communication: Information and influence in an election campaign. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Jackson, R.A., & Carsey, T.M. (1999a). Group components of U.S. presidential voting across the states. Political Behavior, 21, 123-151.
25.
Jackson, R.A., & Carsey, T.M. (1999b). Presidential voting across theAmerican states. American Politics Quarterly, 27, 379-402.
26.
Jennings, M.K., Markus, G.B., Niemi, R.G., & Stoker, L. (2005). Youth-parent socialization panel study, 1965-1997: Four waves combined [Computer file]. ICPSR04037-v1. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies/Survey Research Center [producer], 2004. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]. Retrieved November 4, 2005, from http://icpsr.umich.edu
27.
Krosnick, J.A., & Alwin, D.F. (1989). Aging and susceptibility to attitude change. Journal of personality and social psychology, 57, 416-425.
28.
Layman, G.C., & Carsey, T.M. (2002). Party polarization and "conflict extension" in theAmerican electorate. American Journal of Political Science , 46, 786-802.
29.
Markus, G.B., & Converse, P.E. (1979). A dynamic simultaneous equation model of electoral choice. American Political Science Review, 73, 1055-1070.
30.
Mayhew, D.R. (1986). Placing parties in American politics: Organization, electoral settings, and government activities in the twentieth century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31.
Nadeau, R., & Lewis-Beck, M.S. (2001). National economic voting in U.S. presidential elections. Journal of Politics, 63, 159-181.
32.
Schumacker, R.E., & Lomax, R.G. (2004). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2003). Migration for the population 5 years and over for the United States, regions, states, counties, New England minor civil divisions, metropolitan areas, and Puerto Rico: 2000. Retrieved November 23, 2007, from http://www.census.gov/population/www./cen2000/phc-t22.html
34.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2005). State of residence in 2000 by state of birth: 2000. Retrieved July 9, 2007, from http://www.census.gov/population/www./socdemo/migrate.html
35.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2006). General mobility: 2004 to 2005 detailed tables. Retrieved July 9, 2007, from http://www.census.gov/population/www./socdemo/migrate/cps2005.html
36.
Wiley, D.E., & Wiley, J.A. (1970). The estimation and measurement of error in panel data. American Sociological Review, 35, 961-984.
37.
Wolfinger, R.E., Highton, B., & Mullin, M. (2005). How postregistration laws affect the turnout of citizens registered to vote. State Politics & Policy Quarterly , 5, 1-23.
