Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The quality of woven bed sheets is often conveyed by the thread count i.e. the number of threads per square inch of the fabric. However, bed linens need to encompass three essential characteristics such as high breathability, moisture absorbency and soft feel to ensure quality sleep. Sleep quality is significantly influenced by thermal regulation characteristics such as thermal conductivity, air permeability and moisture vapor permeability of the sheeting cloth. Hand of sheeting material is also considered as one of the most important attributes of a high quality bed linen as it comes in direct contact with human body for a substantial duration. In this research, an effort has been made to develop an objective method to measure the performance behavior of the bed linen fabric. Performance index is a calculation of how well a material works to meet its defined goals. The subjective assessment of bed linen performance indicators was conducted by expert opinion to decide the properties affecting the bed linen performance index (BLPI) along with their weightage. Discriminant analysis and coefficient of concordance was determined to find the agreement among the judges. The eight shortlisted properties were determined objectively and the results were normalized to shrink the data in the scale 1 to 5. The weightage and normalized data was used to determine the BLPI by using the developed equation. A high correlation of 0.84 was found between the subjective and objective BLPI. This study concludes that the BLPI could be estimated well using the developed equation.

Keywords

home textile bed linen bed linen performance index objective evaluation subjective assessment

Introduction

Bed sheet as one of the bed linens, is a fabric placed immediately above the mattress of a bed to provide softness, comfort, warmth and embellished effect. Sheeting fabric is most often used to make bed linens but its light weight, easy care and versatility make it a popular fabric for quilt backings, linings and other items. The sheeting cloths have different behaviors such as aesthetic, comfort and durability. The major requirements of a bed sheet are to be supple and comfortable, soft touch and durable, machine-washable and dryable, absorbent and breathable, wrinkle free, pre-shrunk and stable, singed, mercerized and pill free. Breathability denotes whether the fabric will remain cool or heat-up against our skin [1]. With advancements in textile science, bed linens are designed for performance rather than aesthetics. Based on the use and purpose, different sectors such as hospitals, railways, hotels, homes, etc. use different type of bed linens.

Cotton is the most common fiber used to make bed sheets [2]. However, it is also blended with other compatible natural and manmade fibers to achieve various structural and functional properties, and also to reduce cost [3]. Cotton blended with bamboo fibers are now a days being used for hospital bed linens due to its good hygiene properties [4,5]. The quality of woven bed sheets is often conveyed by the thread count i.e. the number of threads per square inch of the fabric. In general, the higher the thread count, the softer the sheet, but the weave and type of thread may affect the "hand" of the fabric so that a sheet with a lower thread count may actually be softer than one with a higher count. Yarn quality also plays a part in the look and feel of sheets, as finer yarns tend to create a finer sheet fabric. Higher thread count may influence water absorbency, thermal resistance, water vapor transmission rate, and radiant heat resistance whereas air permeability is reversed with increase in fabric cover which ultimately causes an engineering paradox in manufacturing sheeting cloth [6 –8].

A good night sleep is one of the most important things one can give to his mind and body. There are many factors which directly or indirectly contribute to a quality sleep [9]. Bed room environment which includes good blinds, color psychology, a great mattress, bedroom ambience and bedding quality are few attributes need to be carefully selected [10,11]. Bedding needs to encompass three essential characteristics such as high breathability, moisture absorbency, soft feel and OEKO-TEX certified chemical finish to ensure quality sleep. Fabrics which are finished by mechanical treatment are not suitable for a luxury consumption because the appearance is not excellent and glittery [12]. The aesthetic property like pilling is also important for bed sheets. The fiber modulus affects the pilling property of fabrics [13,14]. Pilling also affects the yarn strength, therefore in one of the research the yarn strength was investigated on pilling of cotton/polyester blended fabrics [15]. The requirement of bed linen is also season specific; summer demands cold felled, highly thermally conductive, breathable, high water absorbency and air permeable cloth; contrary to these properties, winter requires warm felled, highly thermally resistant, soft surface and quickly dryable clothing material.

In fact, sleep quality is largely dependent on thermal regulation [16,17]. Therefore, thermal conductivity, air permeability and moisture vapor permeability of a fabric determine the ability of the fabric to ensure thermal comfort [18]. A theoretical study on thermal comfort model in the sleeping environment confirmed that insulation provided by sleepwear and bedding maintains thermal comfort during sleep [19]. Textile fabrics, through their inherent thermal insulation and hygral properties, have critical influence on thermal comfort with respect to heat and moisture transfer between skin and the surrounding environment [20,21]. Temperature plays a big role in quality sleep. Mattress materials, as well as the bed sheets and our body deal with heat differently. Some materials can trap heat and make it more difficult to sleep in warmer months [22]. Household goods and apparels are mostly discarded as the fabric loses its aesthetic appeal. Therefore, the aesthetic characteristics of fabrics play an important role in determining the durability and serviceability of the fabrics [23,24].

Bed linen comes in direct contact with human body for about one-third of life span. Therefore, tactual property and some low stress deformation behavior of the fabric are prime concerns of a high quality bed sheet. It would not be irrational to say that the fabric hand is one of the essential properties of the sheeting cloths considering real user dynamics. The term ‘hand’ is given to the way of assessment by ‘touch’ or ‘feel’ which depends on subjective assessment of fabric by a person [25]. Terms such as smoothness, roughness, stiffness or limpness depend on the type of fabric being assessed [26,27]. Objective evaluation of hand of bed sheet has received significant importance in recent years among users in developed society. Manufacturers pay a great deal of attention to this aspect and make efforts to improve fabric hand as customers always touch and squeeze the fabric and the perceived fabric hand partially influence their buying decision [28]. Foregoing discussion clearly reveals that fabric engineering and objective evaluation of sheeting cloth is still at its infancy. The criteria to accept the quality of a bed sheet is yet to be developed. Engineering design of sheeting should be carried out according to functionality and end use but not based on style, pattern, or pure aesthetic appeal. The multifarious requirements of a high quality bed sheet need to be integrated to develop a reliable and acceptable quality index. Therefore, in this research, an effort has been made to develop a standard equation to evaluate the bed linen performance index (BLPI) objectively.

Experimental procedure

Materials

The fabric samples were developed by using natural and man-made fibers. The CCI tech sample sizing machine was used for sizing of warp yarns and CCI tech sample weaving machine was used to produce fabrics under industrial manufacturing condition. The particulars of the fabrics are given in Table 1. Warp and weft single ply yarns were used. All the spun yarns have a twist multiplier of 4.3–4.4 to facilitate weaving of high cover fabric.

Table 1.

Particulars of fabric samples.

Fiber mix	Areal density (g/m²)	Weave	EPI*PPI	Warp count (Ne)	Weft count (Ne)
100% cotton	120	1/1 plain	80*65	28s	28s
100% PET	96	1/1 plain	84*42	64s	15s
100% excel	142	5 end Satin	192703	60s	80s
100% modal	125	Satin	188*60/2	60s	60s
70:30 modal/cotton	125	Satin	192*62/2	60s	60s
55:45 cotton/viscose	107	2/1 Twill	82*70	40s viscose	30s cotton

Chemical processing of fabrics

The chemical processing of all the fabrics was carried out under standard industrial conditions. The sequence of chemical processing of fabrics is shown in Figure 1. The recipe and the process parameters used are given in Table 2.

Figure 1.

Process sequence of chemical processing of fabrics.

Table 2.

Recipe and process parameters used in chemical processing.

Chemical Process	Recipe	Process parameters
Desizing	Hydrochloric acid – 5gpl, wetting agent – 2gpl, sequestering agent – 2gpl	Temperature – 70°CTime – 30min
Scouring	Caustic soda – 10gpl, wetting agent – 2gpl, non-ionic detergent – 2gpl, soda – 2gpl	Temperature – 95°CTime – 60 min
Bleaching	Hydrogen peroxide – 5gpl, Soda – 2gpl	Temperature – 90°CTime – 30min
Neutralization	Oxalic acid – 2gpl, Hydrochloric acid – 2gpl, non-ionic detergent – 2gpl	Temperature – 70°CTime – 20min
Stentering	–	Drying at 160°CSpeed – 40m/min
Calendering	–	Pressure – 8KgTemperature – 60°CSpeed – 30m/min

Characterization techniques

Descriptive quantitative survey to determine the bed linen performance indicators and their weighted contribution

A questionnaire was prepared and a survey was conducted to identify the bed linen performance attributes by a group of 25 judges. The judges were selected on their knowledge in the field of bed linen such as experts from bed linen industry, academic institutions, etc. so that their opinion should match with the general opinion of the users [29]. This survey was carried out into two steps. In the first steps, the experts were asked to identify the performance indicators that would impact the bed linen performance quality and provide ranking according to their priority in ascending order. In the second step, the weightage (%) was given to the performance indicators for a good bed linen fabric in such wise that the total of all the indicators was 100%. The survey was open-ended and the judges were free to include any indicator which they think would be essential for bed linen fabrics. A discriminant analysis was carried out to determine the variation in the weightage contribution of each performance attributes by the individuals.

Subjective assessment of performance index of bed linen fabrics

The second survey was conducted to evaluate the overall performance of the fabrics subjectively in the scale of 0-5. This step was carried out to understand the consumer’s desire and preference for a good quality bed linen. The coefficient of concordance was calculated to find out the agreement among the judges using the equation (1) [30].

\frac{12 \sum {(R_{i} - R)}^{2}}{r^{2} * n * (n^{2} - 1)}

(1)

where R_i = Average Rank Sum, R = Mean of the Data, r = Total Number of Judges, and n = Total Number of Grades

Evaluating the fabrics properties

The bed linen fabrics were evaluated for the shortlisted properties. The eight important properties determined were total hand value, air permeability, one-way transport capacity, thermal resistance, abrasion resistance, drapability, pilling resistance, and crease recovery angle.

Crease recovery angle

The Shirley crease recovery tester and the standard IS 4681-1968 was used to determine the crease recovery angle of the fabrics. It is the property of fabrics to recover from creases by measurement of the recovery angle [31]. The test sample was first crumpled under a half kg weight for duration of one minute. The size of the sample was 40 × 15 mm. Scale range was 0° – 180°. The fabric recovery is zero when the angle of recovery is 0° means and the fabric recovery is full when the angle is 180°.

Pilling resistance

Martindale abrasion and pilling tester was used for determining pilling rating in a scale of 1–5. The scale of intensity of pilling is given in Table 3. The number of revolutions used was 1000 revolutions. It consists of testing plates mounted on base plates of the instrument, on which abrading fabric was attached and there is a revolving plate, which revolves with the help of three cranks, pegs & motor. Thus, the abrading cycles starts and after the completion of cycles the pilling rating was determined. The standard used was ASTM D4970.

Table 3.

Intensity of pilling scale.

Pilling scale	Intensity of pilling
5	No pilling
4	Slight pilling
3	Moderate pilling
2	Severe pilling
1	Very severe pilling

Abrasion resistance

The abrasion resistance of the fabric was tested on Martindale abrasion tester. In this test the fabric sample gets abraded in all directions. A 38 mm diameter circular specimen was abraded under 9KPa pressure against a standard fabric. During testing 10,000 cycles were used for all the samples. After completing the abrasion, the weight loss of the fabric was calculated. The ASTM standard used was ASTM D4966-98.

Drapability

Cusick drape tester was used to evaluate the drape coefficient of the fabric samples and the ISO 9073-9:2008 standard was used. The circular fabric specimen was used with diameter 30 cm. The fabric was kept in between the two small horizontal disc of 18 cm diameter and was allowed to drape into folds under its own weight [32]. The drape coefficient was calculated using the equation (2).

Drape - coefficient = (Mass of shaded area / Total mass of paper ring) * 100

(2)

The fabric is stiffer if the drape coefficient is higher.

Air permeability

The air permeability of the samples was measured on Textest FX 3300 air permeability tester according to the standard ASTM D737-96. The air pressure maintained was 100 Pa. The instrument measures volume of air passing through the fabric per unit area per unit time [33].

Thermal resistance

The thermal conductivity of samples was measured by using KES-F7 Thermolabo tester. A constant heat was passed through the fabric sample and the amount of heat lost through the sample was measured to calculate the thermal conductivity of the fabric. By using the thermal conductivity and thickness of the sample, the thermal resistance was calculated using the following formula.

Thermal resistance (m² °C/W) = thickness of specimen (m)/thermal conductivity (W/m. °C)

Moisture management

The moisture management properties of fabric were determined by using M290 MMT (Moisture Management Tester) with the standard AATCC 195-2009. It measures the dynamic liquid transport properties of a fabric. As the liquid passes through and across the sample, the difference in the electrical resistance was measured and recorded. The One Way Transport Capacity (OWTC) of the fabric was measured and considered as a performance attribute.

Fabric hand

The Kawabata evaluation system KES was used to measure the low-stress mechanical properties of the fabrics. The four modules KES FB1, KES FB2, KES FB3 and KES FB4 were used to evaluate the tensile and shear, bending, compression and surface properties of the fabrics respectively. These properties were used in the calculation of primary and total hand value of fabrics by using standard Kawabata equations [34,35].

Approach to develop bed linen performance index

The eight properties that have an influence on the performance of the bed linen fabrics were identified by the subjective assessment. These properties were total hand value, One Way Transport Capacity (OWTC), abrasion resistance, air permeability, crease recovery angle, thermal resistance, pilling resistance, and drapability. Each of these properties was evaluated on the different testing instruments objectively. All these properties were integrated to determine the bed linen performance index. It is a standard developed to evaluate the performance of bed linen fabrics using an objective measurement of fabric properties.

After the evaluation of the identified properties the data was normalized to develop the index. Normalization technique transforms heterogeneous criteria data (qualitative, quantitative, different units, etc.) into numerical and comparable data to enable aggregation (fusion) of criteria to determine the rating of decision alternatives. The properties measured have different units therefore the normalization of the data was required. This step was very imperative while dealing with parameters of different units and scales [36]. Normalization also known as Min-Max scaling shrinks the range of the data such that the range was fixed between 0 and 5. Equation (3) was used for normalization.

Scaled characteristics = \frac{X_{i} - {min}_{i}}{{max}_{i} - {min}_{i}} * (max range - min range) + min range

(3)

where i = characteristics, X_i = characteristics value, Min_i = minimum value of characteristics, Max_i = maximum value of characteristics, Max range = maximum value, Min range = minimum value

The maximum range value taken was 5 and the minimum range value taken was 1. Thus, the eight properties were normalized by shrinking the data in the range 1 to 5. The maximum value 5 indicates that the fabric has excellent bed linen performance index and the minimum value 1 indicates that the fabric has poor bed linen performance index. The individual properties measured by different instruments and methods were integrated and a standard procedure was developed to evaluate the bed linen fabrics performance by combining the selected properties into a weighted average approach. This integrated index was termed as Bed Linen Performance Index and the equation (4) was developed to calculate BLPI.

BLPI = \sum_{j = 1}^{k} A j * W j

(4)

where k is the total number of properties, A_j is the grade of the jth property and W_j is the weightage of the jth property.

Results and discussion

Subjective evaluation of ranking and weightage of bed linen attributes

The ranking and weightage was given to the eight short-listed properties by the experts according to their contribution in the bed linen performance as given Table 4. A discriminant analysis to examine the variation among individual experts’ rating is shown in Figure 2. According to the survey, the total hand value of the fabric has higher weightage than other fabric properties with respect to bed linen performance.

Table 4

Ranking and weightage of bed linen properties.

Property	Ranking	Weightage (%)
Total hand value	1	26
OWTC	2	15
Abrasion resistance	3	14
Air permeability	4	12
Crease recovery angle	5	08
Thermal resistance	6	10
Drape	7	08
Pilling resistance	8	07

Figure 2.

Discriminant analysis of the weightage of bed linen properties.

Subjective evaluation of fabrics for BLPI

In the second survey, the fabrics were rated for subjective BLPI in the scale of 0–5 by a panel of experts as given in Table 5. The coefficient of concordance was calculated and was found to be 0.66 that stated reasonably a good agreement among the experts in the evaluation process.

Table 5.

Subjective bed linen performance index.

Fabrics samples	Subjective BLPI
100% cotton	3.50
100% PET	2.00
100% excel	2.50
100% modal	2.60
70:30 modal/cotton	3.80
55:45 cotton/viscose	2.80

Evaluation of various properties of bed linen fabrics

The eight properties were measured using respective standard methods objectively. The results for all these properties are given in Table 6. These properties have different units and to compare the data units must be similar. Therefore, the data was normalized and shrunk into a scale of 0–5 as given in Table 7.

Table 6.

Bed linen performance properties.

Fiber mix	Total hand value	OWTC (%)	Abrasion resistance (weight loss%)	Air permeability (cm³/s/cm²)	Crease recovery angle (°)	Thermal resistance (m²°C/W)	Drape coefficient	Pilling resistance
100% cotton	3.93	703.10	4.05	11.00	92.50	0.131	0.56	4.00
100% PET	1.23	214.57	7.73	30.05	90.25	0.133	0.47	2.00
100% excel	2.32	662.30	5.22	50.12	89.50	0.134	0.35	4.00
100% modal	2.12	985.69	4.54	41.40	83.70	0.132	0.64	3.00
70:30 modal/cotton	1.01	1060.46	11.60	30.08	127.00	0.143	0.27	3.00
55:45 cotton/viscose	1.98	960.00	8.80	96.80	72.50	0.136	0.48	2.00

Table 7.

Normalized bed linen performance properties.

Fiber mix	Total hand value (Aj)	OWTC (Aj)	Abrasion resistance (Aj)	Air permeability (Aj)	Crease recovery (Aj)	Thermal resistance (Aj)	Drape coefficient (Aj)	Pilling resistance (Aj)
100% cotton	5.00	3.31	1.00	1.00	2.47	1.00	4.14	5.00
100% PET	1.30	1.00	2.95	1.89	2.30	1.67	3.16	1.00
100% excel	2.79	3.12	1.62	2.82	2.25	2.00	1.86	5.00
100% modal	2.52	4.65	1.23	2.42	1.82	1.00	5.00	3.00
70:30 modal/cotton	1.00	5.00	5.00	1.89	5.00	5.00	1.00	3.00
55:45 cotton/viscose	2.33	4.52	3.52	5.00	1.00	2.67	3.27	1.00
Weightage (Wj)	0.26	0.15	0.14	0.12	0.08	0.10	0.08	0.07

Evaluation of bed linen performance index

The normalization technique was very important in developing bed linen performance index. The normalized values were used along with the subjective weightage for calculating the BLPI by using the equation (4). In equation (4), A_j was the grade of the fabrics with respect to all the properties as given in Table 7 and W_j was the weightage of the properties as given in Table 4. The value of “k” was eight as the identified properties were eight in number. The objective evaluation of performance index of bed linen fabrics was carried out by the developed equation and the BLPI values are given in Table 8. The coefficient of correlation was determined between the subjective and objective bed linen performance index. The correlation coefficient was 0.84 which was reasonably good as shown in Figure 3.

Table 8.

Objective bed linen performance index.

Fiber mix	Objective BLPI
100% cotton	3.04
100% PET	1.80
100% excel	2.64
100% modal	2.67
70:30 modal/cotton	3.13
55:45 cotton/viscose	3.06

Figure 3.

Correlation between subjective and objective BLPI.

Conclusion

Performance index is an estimation of how well a product works to meet its defined goals. Performance of bed linens depends on many factors such as fabric dimensional parameters, comfort related transmission behavior, hand value and aesthetic properties. In this research work, an effort has been made to develop a standard equation to evaluate the bed linen performance index (BLPI) by integrating eight different fabric properties such as total hand value, one-way transport capacity, abrasion resistance, air permeability, pilling resistance, crease recovery angle, thermal resistance, and drapability. A panel of experts provided ranking and weightage to the properties and also provided subjective BLPI rating to the selected fabrics. Subjective methods have large variation in perceptions due to different skills of the judges thus lacks reproducibility. Therefore, discriminant analysis was carried out to examine the variation among the ratings provided by the individual experts for weightage of the properties and the coefficient of concordance was calculated and it found to be 0.66 that signifies good agreement among the judges. The fabrics were also evaluated for short-listed properties objectively and the normalization technique was used to transform different units into homogeneous data and shrink the data in the scale of 1–5. The weightage and normalized data were used to determine the bed linen performance index (BLPI) by using the developed equation. The correlation between subjective and objective bed linen performance index was quite high at r = 0.84. The study concludes that the bed linen performance index can be estimated with acceptable accuracy level.

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iDs

Vikas Khatkar

BK Behera

References

Gupte

AV.

Thread count, breathability & more: here’s how to choose the right bed linen. The Economic Times, 30 April 2018, pp. 1–5.

Sundaresan

Ramesh

Sabitha

, et al. A detailed analysis on physical and comfort properties of bed linen woven fabrics. Int J Adv Res Innov Ideas Educ 2016; 2: 1649–1658.

Harper

Bruno

Blanchard

, et al. Moisture-related properties of cotton-polyester blend fabrics. Text Res J 1976; 46: 82–90.

Kopitar

Rogina-Car

Skenderi

Thermo-physiological comfort and microbial properties of different textile raw materials and structures. In: Abhijit M, Deepti G and Sanjay G (eds) Functional textiles and clothing. Singapore: Springer, 2019, pp. 285–294.

Арабулі

СІ

Супрун

НП

Очеретна

, et al. Comparative analysis of physical properties of materials for hospital bed linen. Bull Kyiv Natl Univ Technol Des Tech Sci Ser 2019; 130: 36–45.

Okamoto

Mizuno

Okudaira

The effects of a newly designed air mattress upon sleep and bed climate. Appl Human Sci 1997; 16: 161–166.

Webb

Agnew

HW.

Stage 4 sleep: influence of time course variables. Science 1971; 174: 1354–1356.

Suckling

Koenig

Hoffman

, et al. The physiological effects of sleeping on hard or soft beds. Hum Biol 1957; 29: 274–288.

Lan

Tsuzuki

Liu

, et al. Thermal environment and sleep quality: a review. Energy Build 2017; 149: 101–113.

10.

Vidrago

Abreu

Soares

GMB.

Influence of different finishing treatments over mechanical and thermal properties of bed linen. In: Fiber society 2012 spring conference: fiber research tomorrow’s application, St. Gallen, Switzerland, 23-25 May 2012, pp. 2–4. New York: Curran Associates, Inc.

11.

Abreu

Vidrago

Soares

GM.

Optimization of the thermal comfort properties of bed linen using different softening formulations. Tekst ve Konfeksiyon 2014; 24: 219–223.

12.

Esfandiari

Firouzi-Pouyaei

Aghaei-Meibodi

Effect of enzymatic and mechanical treatment on combined desizing and bio-polishing of cotton fabrics. J Text Inst 2014; 105: 1193–1202.

13.

Hajilari

Esfandiari

Dabiryan

, et al. Investigation of effect of fibres modulus on pilling of acrylic fabrics. J Text Inst 2009; 100: 135–140.

14.

Esfandiari

AH.

Effect of fibers modulus on pilling of acrylic fabrics. In: 85th textile institute world conference, Sri Lanka, March 2007, CD Proceeding (Oral)m, pp. 1–3. New York: Curran Associates, Inc.

15.

Canoglu

Tanir

SK.

Investigation of yarn strength on pilling of different blended polyester/cotton fabrics. In: 6th International conference textile science TEXSCI. Technical University in Liberec, Czech Republic, 5-7 June 2007, pp. 5–7. Liberec: Technical University.

16.

Zhang

Wing

YK.

Sex differences in insomnia: a meta-analysis. Sleep 2006; 29: 85–93.

17.

Okamoto-Mizuno

Mizuno

Effects of thermal environment on human sleep and thermoregulation. Jpn J Biometeorol 2014; 50: 125–134.

18.

Lian

Chen

Effect of quilt materials on sleep quality and thermal comfort for young people in East China. Proc Eng 2017; 205: 43–49.

19.

Kothari

VK.

Thermo-physiological comfort characteristics and blended yarn woven fabrics. Indian J Fibre Text Res 2006; 31: 177–186.

20.

Buysse

Reynolds

Monk

, et al. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res 1989; 28: 193–213.

21.

Telzer

Fuligni

Lieberman

, et al. The effects of poor quality sleep on brain function and risk taking in adolescence. Neuroimage 2013; 71: 275–283.

22.

Park

Lee

HJ.

The relationship between sleep quality and mattress types. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet 2002; 46: 745–749.

23.

Krystal

Edinger

JD.

Measuring sleep quality. Sleep Med 2008; 9: 10–17.

24.

Behera

Mishra

Objective measurement of fabric appearance using digital image processing. J Text Inst 2006; 97: 147–153.

25.

Zhang

Kan

Chan

Relationship between physical and low-stress mechanical properties to fabric hand of woollen fabric with fusible interlinings. Fibers Polym 2018; 19: 230–237.

26.

Tadesse

Nagy

Nierstrasz

, et al. Low-stress mechanical property study of various functional fabrics for tactile property evaluation. Materials (Basel) 2018; 11: 2466.

27.

Singh

Behera

Matsudaira

Objective evaluation of terry fabric hand. J Text Inst 2014; 105: 467–476.

28.

Vasile

Malengier

De Raeve

, et al. Influence of selected production parameters on the hand of mattress knitted fabrics assessed by the Fabric Touch Tester. Text Res J 2019; 89: 98–112.

29.

Kandzhikova

Germanova-Krasteva

DS.

Subjective evaluation of terry fabrics handle. J Text Inst 2016; 107: 355–363.

30.

Kendall

Babington Smith

The problem of m rankings. Ann Math Statist 1939; 10: 275–287.

31.

Subramanian

Phalgumani

Manjunatha

, et al. Assessment of crease recovery values of textile fabrics by different instruments. Ind J Fibre Text Res 1983; 8: 16–22.

32.

Viswanaath

Hayavadana

Lakshminarayana

, et al. New methods of assessment of fabric drape. J Text Apparel Technol Manag 2018; 10: 1–9.

33.

Ogulata

RT.

Air permeability of woven fabrics. J Text Apparel Technol Manag 2006; 5: 1–10.

34.

Code for America: www.codeforamerica.org/; Codefest Marathon: www.codefest.eu; Random Hacks of Kindness: http://rhok.cc. Behera BK. Comfort and handle behaviour of linen-blended fabrics. Autex Res J 2007; 7: 33–47.

35.

Majumdar

Pol

SB.

Low stress mechanical properties of fabrics woven from bamboo viscose blended yarns. Fibers Polym 2014; 15: 1985–1991.

36.

Saranya

Manikandan

A study on normalization techniques for privacy preserving data mining. Int J Eng Tech 2013; 5: 2701–2704.

An integrated approach to develop performance index of bed linen fabric

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Experimental procedure

Materials

Chemical processing of fabrics

Characterization techniques

Descriptive quantitative survey to determine the bed linen performance indicators and their weighted contribution

Subjective assessment of performance index of bed linen fabrics

Evaluating the fabrics properties

Crease recovery angle

Pilling resistance

Abrasion resistance

Drapability

Air permeability

Thermal resistance

Moisture management

Fabric hand

Approach to develop bed linen performance index

Results and discussion

Subjective evaluation of ranking and weightage of bed linen attributes

Subjective evaluation of fabrics for BLPI

Evaluation of various properties of bed linen fabrics

Evaluation of bed linen performance index

Conclusion

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

ORCID iDs

References