While plans to develop “smart cities” are gathering pace across the world, we know little about the ways in which the discourses of datafication, smartness, and big data play out in material contexts of urban development, including utility and resource management. In this paper, we explore this intersection in the case of Bangalore’s water supply, where IBM in alliance with the Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board (BWSSB) is implementing a water-flow sensor network and geographic database system under the label of “big data for water supply.” We illustrate how the BWSSB-IBM approach narrows down the complex field of water provision to a question of water in- and out-flow measurements and the monitoring of BWSSB ground personnel. In theoretical terms, we discuss the ways in which these processes constitute both particular claims to knowledge, and the redefinition of citizenship as consumption.
CherletJ.2014. “Epistemic and Technological Determinism in Development Aid.” Science, Technology, & Human Values39 (6): 773–94.
3.
CohenJ.2013. “What Privacy Is For.” Harvard Law Review126:1904–933.
4.
DattaA.2015. “New Urban Utopias of Postcolonial India ‘Entrepreneurial Urbanization’ in Dholera Smart City, Gujarat.” Dialogues in Human Geography5 (1): 3–22.
5.
GreenfieldA.2013. Against the Smart City. Do Projects. (e-book, ISBN 978-0-9824383-1-2)
MadonS.SahayS.1996. “Geographic Information Systems For Development Planning in India: Challenges and Opportunities.” Information Studies2 (1): 3–23.
9.
Mayer-SchönbergerV.CukierK.2013. Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
10.
MerchantA.Mohan KumarM. S.RavindraP. N.VyasP.ManoharU.2014. “Analytics Driven Water Management System for Bangalore City.” Procedia Engineering70:1137–46.
11.
MorozovE.2013. To save Everything, Click Here: Technology, Solutionism, and the Urge to Fix Problems That Don’t Exist. London: Penguin Books.
12.
NairJ.2005. The Promise of the Metropolis: Bangalore’s Twentieth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
PangareG.PangareV.DasB.2006. Springs of Life: India’s Water Resources. New Delhi: Academic Foundation.
RabariC.StorperM.2015. “The Digital Skin of Cities: Urban Theory and Research in the Age of the Sensored and Metered City, Ubiquitous Computing and Big Data.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society8:27–42.
16.
RanganathanM.2009. “Piped Water Supply to Greater Bangalore: Putting the Cart before the Horse?” Economic & Political WeeklyXLIV (33): 53–62.
17.
RanganathanM.2011. “The Embeddedness of Cost Recovery: Water Reforms and Associationism at Bangalore’s Fringes.” In Urban Navigations: Politics, Space and the City in South Asia, edited by AnjariaJ. S.McFarlaneC., 165–90. New Delhi: Routledge.
18.
RanganathanM.2014a. “Paying for Pipes, Claiming Citizenship: Political Agency and Water Reforms at the Urban Periphery.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research38 (2): 590–608.
19.
RanganathanM.2014b. “‘Mafias’ in the Waterscape: Urban Informality and Everyday Public Authority in Bangalore.” Water Alternatives7 (1): 89–105.
20.
ScottJ. C.1998. Seeing like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
21.
TaylorL.BroedersD. (2015). In the name of Development: Power, profit and the datafication of the global South. Geoforum, 64(4): 229–37. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.07.002
22.
TaylorL.RichterC. (2015) Big Data and Urban Governance. In, Geographies of Urban Governance, edited by GuptaJ.PfefferK.VerrestH.Ros-TonenM.Springer.
